Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Because with time, lies change, little bits are added, bits are omitted.
When a case is going nowhere after a few months a standard move is to interview everyone involved again. By then the guilty person has forgotten the lie they rehearsed and repeated months earlier and they end up wih a substantially different statement.
Well i guess thats why everyone is sus on the family they didnt want people to help look for gus and were flat out rude at anyone near the farm, what are they scared of? Somebody might find something
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
This is the important bit. No matter what, in the case of a missing child especially, it's important to get immediate, comprehensive, and independent statements from all witnesses and people present at the scene. Do it within hours. Seperate the key witnesses. Get everything on record. Don't wait for days to pass. Don't give them the opportunity to forget, or collaborate, or allow them to be influenced by others. So what if you waste a few hours and the child turns up? You might actually be able to save immense resources, and move swiftly to solving the case. Too many times we see that a case might have been solved quickly, and maybe the child even found alive, if only the right questions had been asked of the right people at the right time.
What I’d like to have confirmed is police have established a time line of when Gus was last seen alive by A member of the public ?
If that was the case then the parents who have been cleared are involved.
What Police know and what Police release to the public are two very different things, for varying reasons.
Someone has to roll over though. What if they remain silent. Unless they planted bugs and have listened to conversations.
First wouldn't talk at all, now speaking through lawyers. I also find this privacy about all else very odd. I would have been talking with the media from day one and accepting all assistance.
Gus Lamont's grandparents 'absolutely devastated' by major crime declaration
The grandparents of missing four-year-old boy Gus Lamont say the family has "cooperated fully with the investigation and want nothing more than to find Gus and reunite him with his mum and dad".www.abc.net.au
so weird. thats it? thats the whole statement?
If most mother's were deceived by her parents in a situation similar to this suggested scenario ...... hell would hold no fury compared to Momma.
In other cases (e.g.Kristy Abrahams) perpetrators have been found to go check on graves. So I think it was designed to definitely, (a) showcase the power and accuracy of the technology which has been used in this case and it's ability to provide real time evidence and (b) to intimate that they have other records of movements across the property since Sept 27.
If he had been on the farm with his mother etc, its quite likely no one outside the family had seen him for weeks. So even though this question needs to be asked, it may not be helpful. You have to remember how isolated this property was and how these properties work. Food shopping is usually only done monthly or even six monthly (powdered milk, homemade bread and cakes, meat from their livestock and chickens for eggs and meat, frozen veggies or grow their own etc) fuel is usually delivered by a tanker etc and even if someone went into the nearest town they probably would not have taken a child with them on the long drive. Its quite likely no one had even seen the adult family members for weeks or months.
The only thing I can think of to fit a scenario of something happening to Gus before this day is if Jess lives in another house on the property or had been away for a few days or so and not seen Gus and hadn’t specified the last time she’d sighted Gus.
I’ve read that there’s drone companies that monitor vegetation in rural areas with drones.
