Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 3 * Coroner's Hearings Concluded

[Kurve]

Continued from PART 2

Criminal charges:

• Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
• 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
• 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
• Stalking &/or Intimidation on FF *Guilty Overturned on Appeal
• Stalking &/or Intimidation on FM *Guilty
• Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty

TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

Please type names out in full for those who are not covered by suppression orders.

For those covered by suppression orders, please use the following to indicate:

WT - William Tyrrell
FM - Foster Mother
FF - Foster Father
FGM - Foster Grandmother
FD - Foster Daughter
FPs - Foster Parents

Up to you if you wish to refer to them as former fosters but please write it in full, strictly using the above. No deviations.

Other initials posters will use informally but should not are:

BCR - Batar Creek Road
FA - Frank Abbott
MW - Michelle White
SFR - Strike Force Rosann
AMS - Anne Maree Sharpley
CCR - Cobb and Co Road
GO - Geoff Owens
One even reduced bike riding to - BR
COG - Consciousness of guilt. Like WHO KNEW?

 

[GraceE]

And right on cue, Inspector Small deletes the bootleg copy of the statement he posted. Too bad it was up plenty of time for interested parties to copy.

Interesting thing why he deleted right after "instructions "from Grace. Are they working together? Are they one and the same?
I think SFR will be interested in getting to the bottom of this as my research indicates that that particular statement has never been released.

Where did Inspector Small get it from?
Why did he suddenly delete it?
I know that Insp Laidlaw is going to be much more interested in this than fantasy images of reflections in shrubbery.

Who gives a F. Distraction again with BS. I have one identity. Inspector has 4 I think. Why I haven’t yet determined. If an argument is to be raised that they were asked to be excluded. Proof. Statements are provided to The witness. Could be their own? See the problem? If you don’t have the signed copy and not in right format and the custody chain can’t be established…………end up whistling but not heard. In other words tough s**t

 

[Curious Clues]

I haven't heard about the foster care documents
Sounds interesting.

With the furniture

I brought it up not long ago but I'll bring it up again.
There was talk about furniture being stacked up on the balcony with a sheet or something covering it. Maybe ready for deck repairs, idk.
Do you know if this was true?
I take it that you might be talking about the furniture in the shot of the family with Wendy Hudson though.

FPs seem to be too close to people in the case.

Too close to MW.
Too close to Jubelin
Too close to Wendy Hudson (going off FF and her sons search)
Too close to whoever asked Insight for PR.

Shame about purple wiggle, thought he was on to FFs storytime

Purple Wiggle lol

 

[Lady O]

I haven't heard about the foster care documents
Sounds interesting.

With the furniture

I brought it up not long ago but I'll bring it up again.
There was talk about furniture being stacked up on the balcony with a sheet or something covering it. Maybe ready for deck repairs, idk.
Do you know if this was true?
I take it that you might be talking about the furniture in the shot of the family with Wendy Hudson though.

FPs seem to be too close to people in the case.

Too close to MW.
Too close to Jubelin
Too close to Wendy Hudson (going off FF and her sons search)
Too close to whoever asked Insight for PR.

Shame about purple wiggle, thought he was on to FFs storytime

There is quite a bit of furniture on the high verandah.

 

[winyhill]

I think that would be funny if you asked them. Formatting errors for mine kind of a giveaway. didn’t see curious clues comment on subject

Knock yourself out though please. that could be entertaining if you went to them about documents that end up being fake

Never like this sort of thing. Never know what’s reliable or not. Impairs analysis

I don't think they are fake. But I don't need to go to them about documents.
They will investigate all by themselves!
I am sure they are better placed than you to forensically examine what Inspector small posted in order to determine authenticity, source of leak and who Inspector Small is mouthpiece for.
Each digital copy distributed had a unique signature so it will be easy to see where the leak came from.

But we all knew already, didn't we?

 

[GraceE]

I don't think they are fake. But I don't need to go to them about documents.
They will investigate all by themselves!
I am sure they are better placed than you to forensically examine what Inspector small posted in order to determine authenticity, source of leak and who Inspector Small is mouthpiece for.
Each digital copy distributed had a unique signature so it will be easy to see where the leak came from.

But we all knew already, didn't we?

You live in a fantasy land honestly.

You honestly think they are going to chase forensically to prove a minor offence. Contempt of court

 

[Curious Clues]

I don't think they are fake. But I don't need to go to them about documents.
They will investigate all by themselves!
I am sure they are better placed than you to forensically examine what Inspector small posted in order to determine authenticity, source of leak and who Inspector Small is mouthpiece for.
Each digital copy distributed had a unique signature so it will be easy to see where the leak came from.

But we all knew already, didn't we?

You having another Wine on the hill with your mean ol lady self again?

 

[passball]

There is quite a bit of furniture on the high verandah.

View attachment 2555133

View attachment 2555134

Looks dangerous if a chair was moved closer to the rail, a young child would get to the top rail from those chair heights.

 

[passball]

What documents are people talking about?
I didn't see anything

 

[GraceE]

Hey Grassy Knoll,

I have some images you might be interested in. PM me.

 

[GraceE]

What documents are people talking about?
I didn't see anything

Allegedly leaked witness statements of FM

 

[NRL Fan]

Isn’t it interesting that you are doing everything to divert attention away from said documents content.

FM is adamant she put down her hot cup of tea right before she took the alleged roar photo at 9:37.

FM told all her friends and family William disappeared when she was inside making tea. This was confirmed via the SFR investigation and spoken about at the Crime Commission hearing.

FM had 4 years to amend any of her statements, and she did, we know this.

FM never amended her statements to add in making more cups of tea ️ so according to her, tea was made once that morning, and it was supposedly right before the alleged 9:37 photo.

It's possible she was making tea for her mum. She didn't specifically say she was making tea for herself.

 

[Jim Cricket]

You’re either inside making a cup of tea when your child disappears forever and never to be seen again, or, you’re sitting down only metres away when your child disappears never to be seen again. Which one is it?
Nobody would forget such a moment in their life.

When did she say she was sitting down only metres away when she realised he'd disappeared never to be seen again? Link?

 

[passball]

Allegedly leaked witness statements of FM

Missed that.
And they were fake?

 

[Curious Clues]

It's possible she was making tea for her mum. She didn't specifically say she was making tea for herself.

Yeah maybe. The point is that FM never told police that William disappeared when she was inside making tea. But that’s what she told her friends and family. Why different stories for different people?

 

[Curious Clues]

When did she say she was sitting down only metres away when she realised he'd disappeared never to be seen again? Link?

 

[Jim Cricket]

Who gives a F. Distraction again with BS. I have one identity. Inspector has 4 I think. Why I haven’t yet determined. If an argument is to be raised that they were asked to be excluded. Proof. Statements are provided to The witness. Could be their own? See the problem? If you don’t have the signed copy and not in right format and the custody chain can’t be established…………end up whistling but not heard. In other words tough s**t

Interesting what signed witness statements do Grace, they provide evidence of truth, fact. The reason for that is because dishonest people tend to make things up.

 

[Jim Cricket]

View attachment 2555282

So she didn't say she realised he'd disappeared forever.

 

[GraceE]

Interesting what signed witness statements do Grace, they provide evidence of truth, fact. The reason for that is because dishonest people tend to make things up.

Wrong. Witness statements in this case are fabrications of the minds of two sick people who in my honest opinion harmed a child then told a fantasy story to prevent going to jail. BUT the net is tightening as we speak

Conjecture and opinion on case analysis

 

[GraceE]

So she didn't say she realised he'd disappeared forever.

Getting desperate now.PR videos. Why can’t I see him. Why can’t I hear him

Because he was taken away at 8am
Having died after an incident and was temporarily placed in bush and buried next day. That’s why

Conjecture and opinion on case analysis

 

[Curious Clues]

So she didn't say she realised he'd disappeared forever.

Nobody said FM said that.

 

[passball]

It's possible she was making tea for her mum. She didn't specifically say she was making tea for herself.

FM said she took the photos.
I took 3 photos.
Why did she say 3?
Wasn't to hide FD as she is in all the photos.

For me to believe that William was playing like a tiger from 9.37 until 10.30 is hard.
Seems like William's attention span was short.
The FGM said he was bored with drawing/games so I doubt he kept up tigers for an hour.

That morning there had been issues over a toy.
Lots of description about William and his tshirt wearing. Was that even needed. Why not just say what he had on than describe why he had it on? Not needed.
FM supposedly upset with FF.
William deliberately crashing his bike into bushes ending the riding. Did this even happen?
William not wanting to draw.
William throwing the dice the wrong way.
FGM upset with William.
All negative before he disappeared.
After he disappeared, everyone was happy, lots of joy, William bouncing out of his skull, peace and quiet.
Strange.

Why might William not hear?
That should have been questioned then, should be questioned now if not

 

[Jim Cricket]

Wrong. Witness statements in this case are fabrications of the minds of two sick people who in my honest opinion harmed a child then told a fantasy story to prevent going to jail. BUT the net is tightening as we speak

Conjecture and opinion on case analysis

No I'm right arb Grace. Once again you're seeing what you want to see rather than what's there. I'm not talking about the allegedly fake document Tiny put up, I'm talking about your comment to the effect that for it to be established as real, as the truth and as proof, evidence needs to be supplied, In Tiny's case by a signed document. If there's no supporting evidence or proof it means nothing. Not only in documents but in - drum roll - forums - get it now? Probably not but everyone else will and they'd have got it the first time. For someone who constantly refers to himself as an investigator you sure do miss a lot of things. And no, you calling yourself that isn't bait. The rest of this comment of yours has nothing to do with any of it and like most things is also fantasy.

Something else I find really interesting is that you're frothing at the mouth about FM going to jail and not about William getting the justice he deserves. It's all about FM, not William. Why is that? Same goes for others in here with one in particular being obsessed with Jubes and how bad a cop he was rather than justice for William. I find it extremely distasteful.

 

[Jim Cricket]

Nobody said FM said that.

But I'd expect that to be the point she remembers most rather than when she first couldn't hear him. When you're involved in a car accident is when you first sat in the car the important bit or is that later when the accident happened?

 

[GraceE]

No I'm right arb Grace. Once again you're seeing what you want to see rather than what's there. I'm not talking about the allegedly fake document Tiny put up, I'm talking about your comment to the effect that for it to be established as real, as the truth and as proof, evidence needs to be supplied, In Tiny's case by a signed document. If there's no supporting evidence or proof it means nothing. Not only in documents but in - drum roll - forums - get it now? Probably not but everyone else will and they'd have got it the first time. For someone who constantly refers to himself as an investigator you sure do miss a lot of things. And no, you calling yourself that isn't bait. The rest of this comment of yours has nothing to do with any of it and like most things is also fantasy.

Something else I find really interesting is that you're frothing at the mouth about FM going to jail and not about William getting the justice he deserves. It's all about FM, not William. Why is that? Same goes for others in here with one in particular being obsessed with Jubes and how bad a cop he was rather than justice for William. I find it extremely distasteful.

You have serious issues dude. This is ALL about justice for William. The discussion was about whether statements are real or fake, and accordingly whether any contempt of court proceeding would occur. Or wither on lack of evidence that they were leaked to start. Not worth discussing. The LE machinery always makes sure that protection is afforded where it’s needed.

Have you been drinking? Off with winy getting a little deep into it are we? it’s been a very long arduous journey since 2014. You hope all the obfuscation will get you relief from the pain. It won’t. There is a great deal of pain and anguish yet to endure before the FPs finally get what’s deserved in my opinion. A stint 14 years each having forced change of sexual orientation as an inmates bitch. Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. That’s only the start though.

Consequences. That’s what awaits the FPs in my opinion. These people know what was done because they were SOLE authors. That irrevocably ties them to the rubbish produced. The substitution AND its inherent WEAKNESSES. Whereas it was once used as a shield to hide, now it stands conspicuous and vulnerable for what it is a fake substitution and a gold stamped ticket to incarceration. No place to hide. No lie will help. Their own fakery will sink them. Not if or maybe but certain. Once their total alibi is crushed as fakery they go to jail plain and simple.

Conjecture and opinion on case analysis

 

[31550]

Something else I find really interesting is that you're frothing at the mouth about FM going to jail and not about William getting the justice he deserves. It's all about FM, not William. Why is that?

You have demonstrated no interest in pursuing justice for William. But all you have done is attempt to defend the FM at every opportunity. The FM was responsible for William when he went missing, and the last person to see him alive. She is yet to completely and consistently account for all her actions around the time of William's disappearance, and has woven an ever-changing, inconsistent, and in some cases physically impossible narrative about this time. There have been countless posts about the inconsistencies in this narrative and after 12 years of investigation, neither the FM nor SFR, let alone anyone in this forum is able to come up with a plausible timeline of events which satisfactorily includes ALL the elements of FMs narrative without implicating her (and/or the foster family) in some sinister activity related to Williams disappearance. This is no witch hunt. It's a serious investigation with serious issues to be resolved.
None of these inconsistencies have been resolved, and until they are then there cannot be justice for William.
The FM remains protected by the law, NPOs and secrecy provisions. There was no protection for William.
The FM has money and lawyers and friends in high places. William had none of those.
The FM is walking around free. William is dead.
I think if anyone really wants justice for William they will also want satisfactory ANSWERS to questions about William's disappearance, and those answers can only come from the FM at this stage. All other avenues of enquiry have been exhausted until these answers are provided and a true timeline established. Then we might determine who is guilty and who isn't.