Remove this Banner Ad

Trades 2026 Round 4 Fantasy Trades

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I feel like Vis is useless so I like the Steene option. Carroll could go as well but could still squeeze a tiny bit more cash out of him.

Not a bad week to cash up on given we have Whit Ash Sinc Wang Callaghan as targets.
Yeah 100%, if i dont this week then probably wont for a few more.
 
Was thinking the ship has sailed on Watkins but like you said has a 95 in his cycle now and I think Josh Carr and Port are not going to delude themselves into playing the oldies. Mature age MSD pick = decent scorer.

I don't have Visentini as R3, unfortunately lumbered with Jackson/Grundy/ZZ
You could cash out someone like Blakiston > Steene and move ZZ to defence/utility
 
Screenshot 2026-03-31 111213.webp Screenshot 2026-03-31 111406.webp
Option 1: Leaves Blakiston on field. Hold Windy for Whit next week. have (2x Daicos, Ash and Sinclair)
Option 2: Swallowing my ego/pride and trading back in colby.


Its a matter of cash gen vs points. Idk really torn between these trades. Even considering maybe downgrading bont to Holmes but I feel Bont could go big against the witches hats during his training excerise.

Thoughts?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I think hes fine, has scored well enough other years with him, they also have a great run, but yeah his CBA's might drop a little, although i think he could start holding the 70% CBA's soon enough. Can def wait on him though.
Can you have both?
 
View attachment 2567779
This is so frustrating
Does anyone know if he will still be eligible for DPP in round 6?
Grrr

Might have to bring in a Moore/Bolton (eek) for Trac since Marshall is out
Marshall, Dawson, Xerri....my non early bye round picks are playing less games than bye players ffs. Absolutely cooks your team.
 
Ashcroft and McCluggage

It does shit me a little bit - just say the name, no one thinks you're clever for calling Noah Anderson 'Nando' or Ed Richards 'Red'. If it's too long, just use easily understood abbreviations like Bont. If there is a player with the same last name, use a variation of Naicos or NDaicos.

/rant
 
It does shit me a little bit - just say the name, no one thinks you're clever for calling Noah Anderson 'Nando' or Ed Richards 'Red'. If it's too long, just use easily understood abbreviations like Bont. If there is a player with the same last name, use a variation of Naicos or NDaicos.

/rant
So you don't own Worm?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

How are we ranking the uber premium targets in the midfield (outside of Daicos)? I shelled out for Zorko thinking he would be an absolute pig last round, so I'm a bit gun shy now and thinking chasing value is better?

Who's the better trade target this round?

1. Smith - $1.181M - BE 90 - Ave 121.3 - Ownership 10.1% (top 5%) - Hawks, Eagles, Dogs, Port, North upcoming (Dons, North, Tigers in Rds 22/23/24 btw :openmouth:)

2. Bontempelli - $1.145M - BE 107 - Ave 111.7 - Ownership 24.8% (top 5%) - Dons, Hawks, Cats, Swans upcoming

3. Holmes - $1.095M - BE 89 - Ave 117.0 - Ownership 15.1% (top 5%) - Hawks, Eagles, Dogs, Port, North upcoming

Will want all 3 eventually, so maybe its a moot point?
 
Last edited:
How are we ranking the uber premium targets in the midfield (outside of Daicos)? I shelled out for Zorko thinking he would be an absolute pig last round, so I'm a bit gun shy now and thinking chasing value is better?

Who's the better trade target this round?

1. Bazlenka - $1.181M - BE 90 - Ave 121.3 - Ownership 10.1% (top 5%) - Hawks, Eagles, Dogs, Port, North upcoming (Dons, North, Tigers in Rds 22/23/24 btw :openmouth:)

2. Bont - $1.145M - BE 107 - Ave 111.7 - Ownership 24.8% (top 5%) - Dons, Hawks, Cats, Swans upcoming

3. Holmes - $1.095M - BE 89 - Ave 117.0 - Ownership 15.1% (top 5%) - Hawks, Eagles, Dogs, Port, North upcoming

Will want all 3 eventually, so maybe it’s a moot point?
I mean you can’t go wrong with any but for reliability and the Dons sugar hit this week Bont has to be the go imo

But Sniff is tempting though…..
 
Last edited:

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Am I silly for considering Josh Dunkley?

Scoring history 104-108 the last 4 years. Has dropped nearly 100k thanks to a 73 in opening round. Good run coming up, Berry doing the tagging now, I think? At 1.030m he's cheaper than the likes of Holmes and Steele.
 
Thinking about trading Nando for Red this week with raccoon out
If you can’t get to Bont, Richards is fine as a pick for sure

But man just looking at Baz’s run in particular having Port, North and Eagles amongst the next five, suddenly makes him v Bont a really hard call (I have Richards already so I have one Dog) but Bont’s Bont and doesn’t need a matchup to score well

All dependent on if Worpel’s recalled and he’s punted out of the centre rotations again
 
Don’t you dare you bald campaigner


As a McAndrew as R3 truther, all I can say to Nicks is
demanding do it GIF
 
Im not sold Tim English can score more than 110 AFL Fantasy points this weekend. I am seeing a break even of 123 quoted on AFL Fantasy webpage. My current team:

View attachment 2567227

View attachment 2567236

Want to downgrade Tim English to Steene, and upgrade Harley Reid to Bont.

Agree with a poster on here, think the way the Eagles play- they are more focussed on winning games of football than stat padding for points.

I had Steele at the beginning of the season, but one surprise tracking the points live , was how many tackles Steele picked up anonymously. Feel like playing at the MCG suits his scoring style over Marvel. (or any outdoor ground for that matter)

Z Uwland is useless for AFL Fantasy points scoring and I will consider removing him next week.
Not to be blunt but trading English down to a rookie and having Briggs at R1 is really silly IMO
 
Do I go for Steel and Bont in the midfield and save around 300k for upgrades next week, or do I just go all out and pay up for Bont and Baz?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom