Gysberts2Bate
Brownlow Medallist
Daniel Bell?Collingwood are eternally protected. Thats thrice they did that to our players.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Daniel Bell?Collingwood are eternally protected. Thats thrice they did that to our players.
There is an ocean of difference between duty of care and deliberate.He didn't deliberately try and hit his head. It's a shit accident and horrible for Mihocek but this piss weak nature of everyone gagging for suspensions everytime there's an accident can piss off
Not if you want it to maintain any of the original parts of it being a contact sportThere is an ocean of difference between duty of care and deliberate.
The AFL's own prosecution used 'Frampton should have let him go' as a defenceYeh don’t think malice mate - jus think instinct to bury a player
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It's not about gagging for suspensions, it's about wanting to see the rules applied consistently.He didn't deliberately try and hit his head. It's a shit accident and horrible for Mihocek but this piss weak nature of everyone gagging for suspensions everytime there's an accident can piss off
What rule? He got a free kick for holding the ball and then got suspended only because Mihocek was hurt after the fact. There was like multiple tackles like that in the game but the blokes head didn't get stuck awkwardlyIt's not about gagging for suspensions, it's about wanting to see the rules applied consistently.
This was basically a freak incident so I’m not sure what consistency you’re talking about.It's not about gagging for suspensions, it's about wanting to see the rules applied consistently.
The AFL's only line of prosecution in the case was be should have foreseen damage and released the tackle. So basically stop playing the gameThis was basically a freak incident so I’m not sure what consistency you’re talking about.
Presumably this means his left hand says DILL?Has "DILLON" tattooed on his knuckles now because this goes to the top and Dan's coming for him
If it was a Cwood player who was injured then the offending MFC player would be looking at a lengthy ban.This was basically a freak incident so I’m not sure what consistency you’re talking about.
What rule? He got a free kick for holding the ball and then got suspended only because Mihocek was hurt after the fact. There was like multiple tackles like that in the game but the blokes head didn't get stuck awkwardly
We'll have to agree to disagree here. I don't care enough to keep it goingThis was basically a freak incident so I’m not sure what consistency you’re talking about.

Nuffy take.If it was a Cwood player who was injured then the offending MFC player would be looking at a lengthy ban.
Seemed like a prosecution that didn't really believe in their case.The AFL's only line of prosecution in the case was be should have foreseen damage and released the tackle. So basically stop playing the game
If that doesn't prove it was a flawed logic nothing does
I thought we were addressing consistency? Never mind.Nuffy take.
You’d be spewing if we got a player rubbed out for what Frampton did.
Consistent to what? What are you comparing it toI thought we were addressing consistency? Never mind.
I would only be "spewing" if the same rules and judgement were applied differently. As they were in the Frampton case.
Succumbing to the zeitgeist and failing to recognise the preferential treatment handed out to Cwoods only perpetuates it.
What inconsistency are you actually talking about? What similar incident has resulted in a Melbourne player being suspended?I thought we were addressing consistency? Never mind.
I would only be "spewing" if the same rules and judgement were applied differently. As they were in the Frampton case.
Succumbing to the zeitgeist and failing to recognise the preferential treatment handed out to Cwoods only perpetuates it.
Consistent to what? What are you comparing it to
What inconsistency are you actually talking about? What similar incident has resulted in a Melbourne player being suspended?
I don’t necessarily think he needed to miss gamesThe AFL's own prosecution used 'Frampton should have let him go' as a defence
That shows how stupid the suspension was to begin
You do realise his feet left the ground when Mihocek moved into him? How in the hell is he supposed to roll. People are acting like Mihocek was bent over weight about 15 kegs just asking to get manipulated aroundI don’t necessarily think he needed to miss games
But, I do feel like it could have been avoided if he rolled in the tackle - don’t think that’s a stretch as that actually helps protect yourself too
Agree letting go isn’t an option
Nah not that hard mate.You do realise his feet left the ground when Mihocek moved into him? How in the hell is he supposed to roll. People are acting like Mihocek was bent over weight about 15 kegs just asking to get manipulated around
