Search results for query: *

Still waiting for you to back up this stupid claim.

Thats all well and good, but he said "many of your posts" and you have taken it from 1 small part of a single post.

Many of my posts show I overreact and hate the guy? Show me them.

I mentioned 3 ugly things he did, and you have purely focused on whether his victim reached for his eyes or not. If you are basing it purely on reaction, why don't you think worse of his leg stomping? Or is that an over reaction? if so, how much is the perfect amount to react to a dog act? No...

Have you ever disagreed with a decision made by the MRO?

Oh good. Another unbiased and balanced view here to talk down the issue.

No angel? What do you mean? Hitting a bloke in the head thats being held down, scragging at his eyes, and stomping on the leg of an opponent have always been important and admired parts of our game. They show real toughness and should probably be rewarded. Glad you are here to provide this...

Wants to model his game on Chris Judd.

I look forward to the tigers community trying to put this on Hurley while the pest gets a warning that he better not do anything else, or he might get another warning.

Lynch is a serial pest.

Umpires have ****ed us badly this year. Nobody in a position of power will admit it though.

Being endorsed by king would surely make the umpiring fraternity think "oh *!"

Do they review their efforts?

Seems autocorrect changed life to a week.

It was $1000 for the comment........$10,000 for the goal post. Make no mistake, it was just delivered the other way around so the decision not to penalise the goal post shaking wouldn’t look quite so bad.

“No umpire, I did not intentionally shake the post. I was just giving it a hard bump to intentionally intimidate my opponent. I did this repeatedly until you told me to stop. My intention was to intimidate him, not to shake the post. Any movement was an unintended consequence.”

Ok Trump.

If there is one thing I know about the high flyers in this world, it's that they love telling people on an anonymous internet forum that they are high flyers.

Wow. There has been some pretty stupid s**t posted about this incident, but you have managed to rise about all other efforts and take the cake.

As soon as the mention of the Cox incident is brought up as a comparison it is clear that there is no chance of reasoned discussion.

What a terrible thing for the game that would be. All so you can benefit from a terrible mistake made in he past.

The AFL ****ed up the Mitchell one. Does one massive mistake tell the players that all dog acts are fine now?

As soon as we start throwing elbows to the back of someone's head, then I would think 2 weeks is more than a fair enough. Conca, Rance and now Martin.

I'm sure you will argue that the same standard should apply when your players are attacked with an elbow from behind next week.

Open for debate, sure. Wanting the same penalty as Mitchell however means you are happy for players to get away with this every week. If 22 Port players come out and throw elbows at the back of every Tigers players head, nowhere near the ball next week, I expect you to suggest they should all...

So when is the right time to fix the mistakes of the past? These are s**t acts and need to be stamped out. Letting them get off lightly in the past is wrong. If they turn around and say that light penalties in the past mean players can continue to get away with it in the future, players have a...

Tiger fans wanting less because of the Mitchell precedent are suggesting players should be allowed to elbow to the back of the head, way off the ball any time they like. You either think it should be punished, or you think players should get away with it.

Was that this year? If you are going by precedent you cant compare years. Some years gut punches are punished, yet this year it seems they are laughed at despite talk of wanting to come down hard on them.

You can't separate what someone said with the club written under their username? You know I don't represent the EFC don't you? You also know that you not wanting a bad word said about the dickhead with a few tats won't actually change the fact he is a stain right? Rolling stones.........

Been talking about stamping these sorts of incidents out of the game. It's just a shame one of the protected species is behind it. Puts the AFL between a rock and a Richmond fans head. He will get the severest of talking to's, and sternly told that it would be good if he didn't do stuff...