Search results for query: *

Don’t think many people here would realise that at the top professional level, an elite sportsperson signs a contract adhering to being tested and everything that goes with it, including giving up up your phone. It also wouldn’t involve just drug testing and goes for any high level played...

Yeah. Derek Percy was never found guilty by the justice system either, he must have been a stand up citizen.

I think he was 3.3 grams short actually.

Or maybe the administration screwed up and had to do it just to balance the books? More likely than the crap the club is spewing at the moment. What not just even it out at 10 years for the hell of it....

But they were part of the reason for the spike. Due to them, people decided the COVID crisis was over, there was no need to follow any more social distancing and here we are two weeks later with spikes in numbers and back to an enforcing of restrictions.

You also had 15,000 muppets who thought it was a good idea to stage a protest in the middle of the city two weeks ago in direct contradiction to social distancing protocols. All it did was fuel the mindset of the average person to not bother with their own vigilant practices. Why should the...

This is a solid tell when it comes to articles. Agree with you, self harm seems out of the question. Which then leads to the question of how? You rarely get random strangers stabbing you for no reason, and coupled with Stevens not wanting to co-operate with police, logic says something shady...

My immediate thoughts were Tom Browne is at it again.

This! Too much of a Diedre Chambers coincidence. Smith should be asking Hunter some hard questions. He’s most likely crashed into all those cars while trying to find a spot to park himself. He had to give details to the victims because people came running out to see what was going on...

Yes a normal driver who isn't drunk and driving within the speed limit will take out 4 parked cars in a surburban neighborhood. To top it off, after being sober and leaving the scene, instead of feeling guilty about what you have done like any normal person, or having your mates stop you from...

Sounds like an excuse.

Not on the charge of tampering which is the issue at hand. If the sample came back positive for anything, then thats an additional charge he will have to face.

As already mentioned by others the same sample is poured into 2 different containers, Sample A and Sample B. The reason being if Sample A comes back positive, they will have Sample B as a backup to test if need be. Which is inconsequential to what he is being held account to. Whether that...

Pretty simple. He poured a sports drink into his sample while the testers were watching him.

Yep. As I mentioned earlier, the results of the samples now are really immaterial (even a negative result). If due course was followed properly by the doping testers, he’s toast and will be sanctioned accordingly. If he can find some sort of technicality (as others before him have tried), then...

Pretty sure it wasn’t his first rodeo in providing a sample, so I’m in no doubt that he would know you can’t just pour other stuff in it. Whatever the reason he did it, he would have been full aware it was wrong. Even his tweet admits he made a mistake.

Doesn't work like that. They don't let you off, you can't get out of it. They wait with you until you provide a sample.

Post of the thread. I don't understand how people cannot fathom this process and what happened. There was no slight of hand, there was no "how did the testing officer miss seeing him do it". It was fully observed by the tester, and contrary to what people like Paul Chapman on twitter think, you...

Not like this is the first issue where they are shown to be. No. 728 and counting. However will blow over due to the short term attention span of supporters who will move to the next headline.

So did Beams lose $1.5 million dollars of his own money, or was it only $750K and his initial deposit was matched?

Now we know why his form has been off the last year and a bit. Clubs aren't exactly fans of players who have off field issues affecting their performances so I would say it will devalue his worth a little bit. In the end though someone will take the risk and pick him up in the hope he turns it...

So wont be going to GWS either then.

Interesting that last year, every opposition supporter and his dog on here were going on about how Malthouse and Buckley wouldn't get along because of their egos, yet you want those same people to believe that Malthouse and Sheedy will co-exist harmoniously at GWS with a struggling team! :eek:

They're handballing it off to someone else. Why did they need a press conference to announce that weak decision?