There's a difference between coaching philosophies and gameplan though.
At St Kilda he inherited a list which was filled with mediocre players along with the stars. Guys like MacQualter, Clarke x2, Eddy etc. are really pretty shit, so he built a game plan where his stars could star and the rest he could make do with role players. He didn't have a strong defence, so he set up a style where he could put bit part players in key positions and have weight of numbers help them out. In other words he played to the very limited strengths of his squad after about player #10.
On the other hand at Freo, he has a completely different list. He has a top 3 full back in McPharlin, the best ruckman in the league when fit in Sandilands, and the list fillers, the guys who aren't the stars, are more flashy players than St Kilda's were.
He'll build his team around Pavlich, Sandilands, McPharlin, Mundy, Barlow and Fyfe just like he built around Riewoldt, Dal Santo, Hayes and Montagna. But the likes of Hill, Suban, Ballantyne, Silvagni and co have a lot more attacking prowess than any of St Kilda's mid to bottom tier players did - he's not going to try and turn players like that into bit part players like MacQualter.
Well said....it's going to be one of the more interesting aspects of 2012 to see exactly how he approaches his gamestyle with a very different list.
Obviously there's a number of ways he may go, but one thing i'm confident of is that their stucture and as a result the game style, will be vastly different to that of St.Kilda during his time.......if it's not, then i suspect he is not as good a coach as i thought.




