Competitions 2016 Essendon Board Goal Kicking Comp - Orazio2Joe wins!

[Matt loves Essendon]

Seriously considered picking all 5...

 

[Pweter]

Might have to sit this comp out as i reckon i will forget more often than remember.

It's a shame as there is no doubt i would've won.

 

[Lore]

Not necessarily. See 'buying back in'in the OP.

Yeah I remember. Probably won't happen though

 

[Beerfish]

Another audible sigh of relief with that Stokes goal.

 

[Matt loves Essendon]

Another audible sigh of relief with that Stokes goal.

Should have had 3 goals by now...

 

[Beerfish]

Round 1 results.



Disappointing to lose so many due to 'forgot to tip syndrome' in the first round but remember you can buy back in. All you have to do is nominate 2 goal kickers for next week. Same applies to anyone who was knocked out due to 'I picked the wrong guy' syndrome.

 

[daffo]

I'll go with Goddard this week.

 

[Shermy]

So for me to get back in I have to tip 2 goal kickers?
Somehow I see this going down the drain quickly for I

At this stage I'll go with Stokes and Zerrett

 

[Maddogm]

did those who didn't tip automatically get parish? (who didn't goal)

 

[Beerfish]

did those who didn't tip automatically get parish? (who didn't goal)

No. Those who didn't tip got nobody.. who also didn't goal.

 

[Maddogm]

No. Those who didn't tip got nobody.. who also didn't goal.

so the autopick rule didn't apply for round 1?

 

[Beerfish]

so the autopick rule didn't apply for round 1?

Might help if I read the rules I guess.

You are correct.

 

[Lore]

Might help if I read the rules I guess.

So basically, I have to pick two players to kick a goal next weekend in order to buy back in, and neither of them can be Darcy Parish?

 

[Beerfish]

So basically, I have to pick two players to kick a goal next weekend in order to buy back in, and neither of them can be Darcy Parish?

Correct.

 

[Mercurial89]

Yeah poor by me forgetting. Ill pick 2 later this week

 

[Whispering_Jack]

David Zaharakis

 

[Beerfish]

Well has to be Stokes for me.

 

[monty1104]

Stokes.

 

[Loonerty]

Buying back in with Stokes and Daniher.

 

[Amazing Bombers]

Zaharakis.

 

[DapperDon]

Daniher

 

[LB#16]

Round 2, Zaharakis.

 

[Lore]

To be safe, I'll pick now, so Stokes/McKernan.

But if the teams come out and one or both of them are not selected, then Daniher (to replace one pick), or Daniher/Zaharakis (if I need to replace both) instead?

Can I do that? Rather than ending up with.... some bizarre combination of whoever plays with a number higher than 44 (i.e. McKenna, Kelly, Dea, Polkinghorne, Crowley, Simpkin, Jamar, Grimley, Grima, Michael ... Daniher and Zerrett)?

 

[Beerfish]

To be safe, I'll pick now, so Stokes/McKernan.

But if the teams come out and one or both of them are not selected, then Daniher (to replace one pick), or Daniher/Zaharakis (if I need to replace both) instead?

Can I do that? Rather than ending up with.... some bizarre combination of whoever plays with a number higher than 44 (i.e. McKenna, Kelly, Dea, Polkinghorne, Crowley, Simpkin, Jamar, Grimley, Grima, Michael ... Daniher and Zerrett)?

No I don't really think that's fair. You make two selections. You can change them at any time up until the bounce via another post.

 

[Lore]

No I don't really think that's fair. You make two selections. You can change them at any time up until the bounce via another post.

No worries.