- Mar 31, 2019
- 1,159
- 1,272
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Where are my track watchers at, did Williams the premo get through training
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Port Adelaide this week but Round 14-17 he has Richmond, Bye, Eagles, Geelong. Very good run.Good call, am keeping an eye on him. Nearly there!
It's highly likely. He was rested for this two week stint in the NT but he could well come straight back in next week. The other point is that he is at least not losing cash. There are guys in my side dropping cash this week Roberts - Thomas - potentially Reid who I all want to get rid of ahead of Graham.5 bucks after giving graham the arse dimma brings him back nxt week.
It's honestly pretty easy this year. If you go by the 8-6-8-8 Structure you'll have this amount playing each week before trades.I don't know if its just my side ( i don't think so ) but with the Byes moving to four weeks, it just doesn't seem difficult to navigate any more. In the past I would plan my trades 4-5 weeks in advance. This is the first time i've looked at them and I should have 20+ playing each round with no pre-planning. A big element is obviously the quality and consistency in the rookies we have ( which i could be cursing by saying this now ) which feels unique to past years. But i'm ( touch wood ) feeling comfortable.
It's honestly pretty easy this year. If you go by the 8-6-8-8 Structure you'll have this amount playing each week before trades.
R12:22
R13:24
R14:22
R15:22
Ofcourse, plan based on red dots/premos aswell.Assuming no red dots.
Roberts BE 99 and Dempsey 77Kerch and Graham must trades over Roberts and Dempsey?
The exact opposite I would have thought. Unless you need Roberts and Dempsey on fieldKerch and Graham must trades over Roberts and Dempsey?
Getting Oliver this week.Better to get him now rather than getting him FOR Round 12 - that's what I'd presumed you were saying - hence the NUTS comment. At least you have him for 10 & 11.
Question, do we think buying into a player on their bye is stupid?
Currently my midfield consists of no R12 players and playing my cards right I could get Green in round 12 and have him sitting on the bench (won’t be clogging as I have no R12 midfielders)
It saves the fact that potentially the week after could be carnage and I may never get the chance to buy into Green. Thoughts?
Im aware this is 2 weeks away just food for thought
I didn't appreciate what we had enough.Some more context to that quote and from reading it it’s fair enough, for North’s future from a footballing perspective its better for him to be mid/fwd playing that Miers role kicking into FWD 50.
Probably means it’s definitely time to trade Fantasy wise
View attachment 1990318
I mean it was always gonna happen eventually haha. But at least we had 8 rounds of monster scores out of him + last yearI didn't appreciate what we had enough.
Taken too soon
I think Round 12? (don’t quote me on it)Here's some food for thought...
What round are DPPs and what are Sheez's chances of forward?
13/29 & 8/28 CBAs to date.I think Round 12? (don’t quote me on it)
But you’d hope he gets forward over mid