Link ya team and ill add it if you wantMaybe not quite 1900 but should go close. Depends how Roberts and Graham go I suppose.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Western Bulldogs v Sydney - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Dogs at 55% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 11
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Link ya team and ill add it if you wantMaybe not quite 1900 but should go close. Depends how Roberts and Graham go I suppose.
This was the week having Jackson was meant to give an advantage for the ruck, not even counting in best 18 xDbasically anyone who doesn't have Gawn is scoring big though so it's a bit misleading
Link ya team and ill add it if you want
Yeah i mean the chart is going by averages, so 129.4 Sheezel ect.I'm pretty capable of basic maths mate.
Sheezel (c), Flanders, Grundy, Powell, Fisher should average 100 between them, with obviously that making Sheezel roughly 200 (think that's pretty conservative on him), then Clohesy looped, and Graham and Roberts. If the latter three can get 70-80 each or on average, then that should just about get me to 1900 provided the first group does manage to average 100 or just above.
Yeah i the chart is going by Averages, so 129.4 Sheezel ect.
Seems to be a big week for you.Yeah so I'm being conservative, maybe I can hit 2,000.
If I literally go off averages then Sheezel (258), Clohesy (95), Roberts (81), Graham (84), Grundy (91), Flanders (105), Powell (99), Fisher (79) = 893 + 1018 = 1911.
That's ignoring Flanders is scoring better than that now, as is Grundy, plus Fisher's favourable match up, but also counting on Roberts, Graham and Clohesy putting up another set of good rookie scores.
Seems to be a big week for you.
I said in pre season he would average 90 but caved and started him and felt like a hero against North and WCE. But now I feel like I may have been right all alongSlowly coming around to the fact Tom Greenfarkn sucksPLAYERCARDSTART12Tom Green
- Age
- 23
- Ht
- 192cm
- Wt
- 92kg
- Pos.
- Mid
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 11.5
- 3star
- K
- 4.3
- 2star
- HB
- 7.3
- 5star
- M
- 1.8
- 2star
- T
- 2.3
- 4star
- CL
- 2.8
- 4star
- D
- 11.5
- 3star
- K
- 4.3
- 2star
- HB
- 7.3
- 4star
- M
- 1.8
- 2star
- T
- 2.3
- 3star
- CL
- 2.8
- 4star
- D
- 11.5
- 3star
- K
- 4.3
- 2star
- HB
- 7.3
- 5star
- M
- 1.8
- 2star
- T
- 2.3
- 4star
- CL
- 2.8
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND
This makes no sensebasically anyone who doesn't have Gawn is scoring big though so it's a bit misleading
This is applying averages from the rest of your players then removing bottom 4.
1841 for me.
Is that Z Will?Playing the average game here gets me to 1865.
Is that Z Will?
Unless they have Marshall ....whose score is likely to drop out of most teamsbasically anyone who doesn't have Gawn is scoring big though so it's a bit misleading
Unless they have Marshall ....whose score is likely to drop out of most teams
Then we have Meek versus Xerri today ....still plenty of room for carnage
Is Young confirmed out with a hammy?I've seen many teams go thin down back, I'm guessing counting on DPP players next week .....it could mean holding players draining cash, if you have Stewart, Zilliams, and Young, with already dead rooks on benches
This could be a defining round ....a fork in the road, based on trade decisions this week
If it was tight enough to sit the game out .....you have to assume at best Young misses a weekIs Young confirmed out with a hammy?