Lord Nicholson
El Supremo
- May 30, 2011
- 13,891
- 19,885
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Our Lady of the Worthless Miracle
Semantics...It's the same intake.
yah but i said nd
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Semantics...It's the same intake.
End up turning Melksham, Carlisle and Crameri into Morgan, Francis and MerrettSemantics...It's the same intake.
We haven't been able to retain all of them but it's actually a fair old draft. Melksham, Carlisle, Colyer, Howlett, Hardingham, Crameri.
IMO Dea will get 17 and Kelly 19.I hope Kelly and Dea get new numbers for 2017, seeing the large numbers would give too many people undesired flashbacks to anomaly year of 2016.
Very stoked we gained these 2 soldiers out of the circumstances and they in turn gained the chance at reviving and extending their careers. Well done EFC!
They had 47 and 49 respectively, which aren't that high. Happy for Kelly to keep the 47 because it's not that unusual, it's still sequential with everyone else's numbers (assuming 31 isn't reassigned and 46 is in play) and assuming he retires again at the end of 2017 then his time at EFC would all be in one number. Dea has a two year contract and is still young, so giving him a normal number would make sense. Having said that, if we go with a full list including a full set of rookies with three category Bs then we'd be up to 48 anyway (or 49 without 31).I hope Kelly and Dea get new numbers for 2017, seeing the large numbers would give too many people undesired flashbacks to anomaly year of 2016.
Very stoked we gained these 2 soldiers out of the circumstances and they in turn gained the chance at reviving and extending their careers. Well done EFC!
I like that.IMO Dea will get 17 and Kelly 19.
Give Kelly 17, hes good enough to undo the average curse set upon itIMO Dea will get 17 and Kelly 19.
Only 3 Cat B rookies. So 47 total.They had 47 and 49 respectively, which aren't that high. Happy for Kelly to keep the 47 because it's not that unusual, it's still sequential with everyone else's numbers (assuming 31 isn't reassigned and 46 is in play) and assuming he retires again at the end of 2017 then his time at EFC would all be in one number. Dea has a two year contract and is still young, so giving him a normal number would make sense. Having said that, if we go with a full list including a full set of rookies with three category Bs then we'd be up to 48 anyway (or 49 without 31).
I like that.
3 Cat Bs, 5 Cat As, 40 on the senior list... that makes 48 unless my maths is wrong. Whether we actually do that though is a different story.Only 3 Cat B rookies. So 47 total.
It's either:3 Cat Bs, 5 Cat As, 40 on the senior list... that makes 48 unless my maths is wrong. Whether we actually do that though is a different story.
Damned maths so we can use up to 48 on the jumpers if we skip 31, but not 49.It's either:
38 + 6 + 3
39 + 5 + 3
40 + 4 + 3
That's where your maths is wrong
Damned maths so we can use up to 48 on the jumpers if we skip 31, but not 49.
Sequential numbers are way better tbf.There's no rule saying numbers have to be sequential.
Ben Brown wears 50 because he wants to, no one else at north currently has anything higher than 43. It's just cool and unusual
I know, but the post eth was quoting me on was related to having "normal" numbers, presumably ones that are sequential aside from 31. There's a few people on here that tend to prefer things to fit into patterns and systems like that, although personally I don't care. I like things to be a bit eclectic if that's meaningful to the person who wears it (not that that probably shows much here with all the bloody spreadsheets). I wonder how many people were pissed off by the top-ups having their numbers allocated in order of being signed up, except for Crowley?There's no rule saying numbers have to be sequential.
Ben Brown wears 50 because he wants to, no one else at north currently has anything higher than 43. It's just cool and unusual
I don't think it mattered when Polks was announced, he would have had 50 (his VFL number)I know, but the post eth was quoting me on was related to having "normal" numbers, presumably ones that are sequential aside from 31. There's a few people on here that tend to prefer things to fit into patterns and systems like that, although personally I don't care. I like things to be a bit eclectic if that's meaningful to the person who wears it (not that that probably shows much here with all the bloody spreadsheets). I wonder how many people were pissed off by the top-ups having their numbers allocated in order of being signed up, except for Crowley?
So who gets 1 and 15?IMO Dea will get 17 and Kelly 19.
Laverde for 1. McGrath 15So who gets 1 and 15?