Underarrest_
Club Legend
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2024
- Posts
- 2,617
- Reaction score
- 3,964
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
You’re right.IMO it comes down to a risk vs reward strategy. Or best case vs worst case.
The best case scenario is that Gus is found alive and well. How would that happen? Experts have already said he couldn't have possibly survived this long alone. So, it could only happen if somebody took him from the property and hasn't hurt him (yet). That's the best possible outcome. So the questions police should be asking are:
- Who might have possibly taken him?
- Where would someone have taken him?
Of course, he may never be found. That's a worse scenario. Or he may be eventually found somewhere on the property - that's the scenario police seem to be focussing on.
But the absolute worst case scenario I can imagine is that Gus is eventually found to have been taken by somebody who may have hurt him and eventually killed him, but not immediately - meaning if police had found Gus earlier he might have survived.
Right now police should be trying to avoid, or at least eliminate the possibility of a worst-case scenario.
Maybe police know for some reason that he was on the property and wasn’t taken off the property.
I probably sound like a drag but especially with what happened to their family on the adjacent property, they could have some sort of security somewhere even on the gates. I did think of a motorbike through broken fences but maybe there wasn’t any to get in or out.
Or maybe police are waiting for phone data, not that it will help if whoever took him if this is the case, didn’t have a phone on them.
Police did ask for public information when Gus’s photo came out but they don’t seem to be pushing it.
Last edited:






