A Selwood v Kyle Reimers

[bunsen burner]

Who is the better player?

 

[rich_hawk]

Adam Selwood is a good player, but rather boring.
I voted Reimers even though he's a ****

 

[Sin City]

Strange comparison. Why did you choose these two?

 

[wcesam]

A Selwood

 

[fishguts]

Strange comparison. Why did you choose these two?

He reckons that a Selwood for Riemers trade would be fair.

 

[Schulzenfest]

Selwood by a long way.

 

[blitzer]

Selwood right now but Reimers in the future quite comfortably.

 

[bunsen burner]

He reckons that a Selwood for Riemers trade would be fair.

 

[WN123]

21 year old who has played 31 games vs a 26 year old who has played 128. Not even remotely similar players.

 

[Slattery_20]

He reckons that a Selwood for Riemers trade would be fair.

Why the **** would we want him?
And I'm not saying that in terms of X >Y, he's obviously better than Reimers, but what would he give us?

 

[donbooger]

Adam is heaps better one of the best players at West Coast, Reimers is young but cant get games in a young team so not looking like making up the large gap any time soon.

 

[Turly]

selwood easily.

 

[Smyth94]

Adam is heaps better one of the best players at West Coast, Reimers is young but cant get games in a young team so not looking like making up the large gap any time soon.

Reimers is a walk up start in our 22 when fit - he has battled injury/fitness issues in 2010 yet despite this, had a very promising start to the year.