Remove this Banner Ad

'Accidental' Rape

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So this guy was the one who booked the stripper - the agency telling him the service was known as 'Anal'.

Then on the night he stripped off, got on all fours and let her put lubricant on his arse while she was wearing a pink strap on dildo. What was he expecting next - tea and scones?

p.s. did anyone get her number? ;)
 
Apparently there was some drama at the wedding ceremony too; when the best man was asked for the ring, he burst into tears and curled up in a ball.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

WA ROO said:
If the roles were reversed?
Click to expand...
He'd be straight in gaol. So should she. And who cares if he booked it all, etc. If you pick up a girl, take her home, go to the bedroom, and she says no-if you keep going, its still rape.
 
Tex_21 said:
He'd be straight in gaol. So should she. And who cares if he booked it all, etc. If you pick up a girl, take her home, go to the bedroom, and she says no-if you keep going, its still rape.
Click to expand...

Yep, and its sets a nasty precedent now.. Some guy takes a drunken girl home didn't hear her "no" and now can argue it's an "accidental" rape.
 
Anthony_ said:
Yep, and its sets a nasty precedent now.. Some guy takes a drunken girl home didn't hear her "no" and now can argue it's an "accidental" rape.
Click to expand...
Pfft.

I don't know what dream world you live in, but that will never happen.

Do you actually think that would work as a defense?
 
cancat said:
So this guy was the one who booked the stripper - the agency telling him the service was known as 'Anal'.

Then on the night he stripped off, got on all fours and let her put lubricant on his arse while she was wearing a pink strap on dildo. What was he expecting next - tea and scones?

p.s. did anyone get her number? ;)
Click to expand...
Doen he not have the right to say no?

Even if he had organised the stripper, said yes, and then right before penetration changed his mind, he still has the right to say no.

Look at the case of the 30 second rapist . Where consent was withdrawn during sex. The man was charged and convicted of sexual assault.

Surely this man should be afforded the same right to say no, whether before the act, or during.
 
WCEforeverman said:
Pfft.

I don't know what dream world you live in, but that will never happen.

Do you actually think that would work as a defense?
Click to expand...

Of course I don't believe it would work. :rolleyes: I wonder if anyone tries it though?
 
It is only briefly mentioned in the article, but I'm assuming the defense was based on her accidentally doing it? Did they call it the fusilli jerry defense?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

WA ROO said:
How is that case anything like this one
In the case you are referring to the guy has confessed.
Has he walked free from court?
Trust you to bring up something like this to excuse a woman raping a man.
Click to expand...

Yes he has, even though he pleaded guilty, go figure. :rolleyes:

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25826413-662,00.html

By the way, I'm not excusinng the stripper, but both the victims put themselves in the same vulnerable position. All you guys are saying a man would be instantly jailed if the roles were reversed, I'm just showing that they wouldn't.

But keep up the "us poor men get victimised" line.
 
mantis said:
Yes he has, even though he pleaded guilty, go figure. :rolleyes:

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25826413-662,00.html

By the way, I'm not excusinng the stripper, but both the victims put themselves in the same vulnerable position. All you guys are saying a man would be instantly jailed if the roles were reversed, I'm just showing that they wouldn't.

But keep up the "us poor men get victimised" line.
Click to expand...

Good point. But the circumstances are still quite different. One was dealing with the ability to continue giving consent and the other was dealing with consent explicitly not being given.

Although its quite harsh, I think that both the stripper and the shrub-shagger have committed rape. I'm still undecided if either should have been convicted though. I could never be a judge.
 
mantis said:
Yes he has, even though he pleaded guilty, go figure. :rolleyes:

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25826413-662,00.html

By the way, I'm not excusinng the stripper, but both the victims put themselves in the same vulnerable position. All you guys are saying a man would be instantly jailed if the roles were reversed, I'm just showing that they wouldn't.

But keep up the "us poor men get victimised" line.
Click to expand...
No. These cases are quite different.

In one case consent was explicitly not given.

In the other case it was given. However the point of conjecture in this case is whether consent was still provided when she fell asleep.

But keep banging on about how women are hardly done by.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom