Autopsy AFL 2024 Round 9 - Blues v Demons Thurs May 9th 7:30pm AEST (MCG)

[T2B_]

Seems about right.

Interesting that that is your only take out of my post.

Well it was pretty absurd in an already cooked take.

 

[Dramoth]

Carlton boys, time to universally declare this for what it is.

Arr0w come on I know you enjoy calling out a pathetic whinge.

It’s a tanty worthy of a 2 year old. All the toy came out of the pram, then he climbed out and threw them back in so he could go again.

 

[T2B_]

It’s a tanty worthy of a 2 year old. All the toy came out of the pram, then he climbed out and threw them back in so he could go again.

Danny strikes me as the type that after a loss and some tanty posting on BF, loads up AFL Evo or something and plays career mode as Oliver where he's won 5 Brownlows and regularly gets 40+ possessions to make himself feel better.

 

[FreoRicci]

Thoughts on this mark NOT PAID to McGovern.

Charity goal to Petracca!

That’s actually not a mark. Still didn’t have it under control even at the very end

 

[Dramoth]

Danny strikes me as the type that after a loss and some tanty posting on BF, loads up AFL Evo or something and plays career mode as Oliver where he's won 5 Brownlows and regularly gets 40+ possessions to make himself feel better.

FIFA 24 where he’s renamed Erland to Oliver and installed a cheat mod where he can score 10 goals a game.

 

[Dramoth]

That’s actually not a mark. Still didn’t have it under control even at the very end

He has both hands solidly on the ball and is controlling it. Any other game, that’d get paid.

 

[Vindicater]

Really? If he did is this the Lance Franklin rule? He ran off the line every single time.

The Franklin rule was about his arc. He would start off the line and end his arc on the line. Gawn started on the line and then went off.

Franklin's rule was also bullshit.

 

[GWT6]

He has both hands solidly on the ball and is controlling it. Any other game, that’d get paid.

Smart work by whoever posted that to use the slow-mo vision to make it look like he held it longer than he did, very clever attempt to appease the nuffies.

Even the player didn't think it was a mark - if he did he wouldn't have played for the free.

We know they won't get pulled up, but Carlton needs heavy fines for the diving that the team does, it's a real blight on the game.

 

[Substance]

If Melbourne had curnow or any other actual foward, the comp would weep

 

[zyzzbruh]

He has both hands solidly on the ball and is controlling it. Any other game, that’d get paid.

how long you have both hands on the ball solidly matters... That one wasn't even a second

 

[danster168]

And once more for those playing at home. It gives a real snapshot into the minds of the umps.

 

[Aphrodite]

And once more for those playing at home. It gives a real snapshot into the minds of the umps.

Do you have vision of Steven May dropping the ball in our 50 (all good play on)

We can all play this game!

 

[Aphrodite]

he picked the ball up in the hunched position, and ploughed through with his head. he didn't duck his head in my eyes. He tucked his chin and attempted to barged through. No prior or anything, it was say 2 steps into the tackler? I would've paid it if he had 10 steps, i.e ample prior like Hollands. Yes, ducking the head is prior but because he was never upright and simply stayed low and barged through I don't think it was going to get paid.

I agree that there was probably a few that Carlton fans can complain about but the fact that the ones Carlton fans are complaining about are the 50/50 ones like McGovern's mark/arm chop whereas the dees ones are clear cut wrong decisions that will be first played in the umpire review room on Monday morning.

What mark/arm chop

 

[danster168]

What mark/arm chop

not a mark. he fumbled it, and controlled it for 0.0001 of a second.

 

[Aphrodite]

not a mark. he fumbled it, and controlled it for 0.0001 of a second.

In your opinion.

 

[danster168]

In your opinion.

Thoughts on this one? 10 times worse than McGovern's. Happy to play this game all day and night. Incorrect decisions for Carlton, all bloody night! Pathetic umpiring.

 

[Aphrodite]

Thoughts on this one? 10 times worse than McGovern's. Happy to play this game all day and night. Incorrect decisions for Carlton, all bloody night! Pathetic umpiring.

Nah I am going to enjoy our win

Have a great weekend.

 

[bourbons]

I don't think the free should have been paid but struggling to see where Kemp "throws himself into the ground"

Gets ridden into the ground (legally), sure.

 

[Worm4]

Thoughts on this one? 10 times worse than McGovern's. Happy to play this game all day and night. Incorrect decisions for Carlton, all bloody night! Pathetic umpiring.

15 hours since the game finished. Lol. Never change danster168.

 

[bourbons]

This clip is a strong case for showing how biased Carlton fans are.

How can you possibly think that counts as a mark?

Juggling the ball 3 times without ever controlling it isn’t a mark

"without ever controlling it", good one

 

[Jeremias]

15 hours since the game finished. Lol. Never change danster168.

That’s Mr Thunderdan999 to you!

 

[bourbons]

I can't say too much but FYI you're pretty close to the money with your theories. No one would believe me if I elaborated anyways, but I can't risk it all the same. The picture becomes very clear if you play around with match result data from the last ten seasons, including free kick counts, match day umpires, ladder positions at the time, and average crowd attendances YoY. It's all in there if you're not afraid to lock yourself in a room with an 8 ball and an Excel workbook and put in a solid 72 hour day of number crunching.

I can't tell if this is satire or not, well played

 

[Dramoth]

how long you have both hands on the ball solidly matters... That one wasn't even a second

We've all seen marks get paid with less control of the ball than that. It happens every week.

 

[Forty3]

Smart work by whoever posted that to use the slow-mo vision to make it look like he held it longer than he did, very clever attempt to appease the nuffies.

Even the player didn't think it was a mark - if he did he wouldn't have played for the free.

We know they won't get pulled up, but Carlton needs heavy fines for the diving that the team does, it's a real blight on the game.

Carlton backline has studied Lever's head throwing tactic to win free kicks.
So I guess we have to thank you guys for the tactical education.

 

[zyzzbruh]

We've all seen marks get paid with less control of the ball than that. It happens every week.

Well they shouldn't be marks either then.. Rather than taking the notion that non marks should be paid because others have.

No different during lockdowns when people were complaining that certain people had more freedoms, and wanting them locked down too instead of using it as an example to fight for their own freedom.