Lore
Moderator ❀
- Dec 14, 2015
- 48,920
- 73,343
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Moderator
- #2
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Yeh spot onScores to support would be hard to find and validate my view.
I see a lot more outside run based off the back of all the previous rule changes - much like you do.
The future changes next year will make for even less stoppages/congestion.
The AFL dont want head knocks etc.
I think the best bet is to use top picks on outside predominant players that are efficient on the inside, instead of the other way around.
Or win it in turnover/interceptHe actually went 50/50 split this year as far as contested / uncontested.
You still have to win the footy inside to be able to run it on the outside.
Perhaps I should’ve written - I like Cal, he could be withholding information etc.got anything to back up the 'I like Cal but' statement? Or is it one of those 'I'm not a racist but' type comments?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Bruv. Dees are not doing that.If tigers are hell bent on Grlj then youd think theyre trading back with dees pick 7
7+F1(Suns)
For
4 + F2/F3
Just no mention of it so far, so youd think unlikely, maybe tigers arent taking Grlj
Youd think they may offer F1 or F2+38 for him at blues pick 9 or 11
Why not?Bruv. Dees are not doing that.
An F1 in a stronger draft. Even if it is the suns, pick 16-18 next year might be worth pick 4 here. The talent they'll get at pick 7 here is comparable to the talent at 4.Why not?
Don't know why but I just see Cumming as very Richmond player. This would be almost best case scenario for us. Would be curious to see if we would double down on Mids and take Sharp or go another direction.A Collingwood supporter just posted in the draft rumours thread that the GM of Football at Richmond is in Mildura meeting Cumming today.
Cumming and Taylor to the Tigers, means we get Sharp and Robey. I can't see why Richmond take Robey and Cumming.
Yeah that’s social media for you, never let the keyboard take you out of contextPerhaps I should’ve written - I like Cal, he could be withholding information etc.
I’ve met Cal and Riley a few times. Really nice people.
. All good4 would get them Robey here in this example. How far ahead of a Cumming or Farrow they have him, im not sureAn F1 in a stronger draft. Even if it is the suns, pick 16-18 next year might be worth pick 4 here. The talent they'll get at pick 7 here is comparable to the talent at 4.
Maybe but I don't think Robey is that much more exciting a prospect than Cumming or even Grlj himself. I don't think it's Caddy situation where the alternative is much worse off for the build, that requires them to give up extra.4 would get them Robey here in this example. How far ahead of a Cumming or Farrow they have him, im not sure
Theyre probably getting pick 20 in return with tigers F2
Id say Robey is going before pick 16 in next years draft
Grlj isnt really being linked with themMaybe but I don't think Robey is that much more exciting a prospect than Cumming or even Grlj himself. I don't think it's Caddy situation where the alternative is much worse off for the build, that requires them to give up extra.
I think that would be the best case scenario for our list, although I do like a Robey/Sharp combo.Robey/Taylor without having to trade would be a fever dream. Sign me up
Grlj isnt really being linked with them
I guess im coming from the proviso they do, otherwise why would they trade for him
I personally think hes well ahead of cumming
Why is he ahead of Cumming? Because his contested/clearance work is way worse. Had some nice goals in the finals too but almost exclusively simple lead up stuff with a lot of space to work with or joe the goose stuff. It's nice stuff but not exactly salivating. He has a lot of potential based on his frame and atheletism, but he is a far rawer prospect than people are acting. There's a reason West Coast haven't pivoted from a 200cm ruckman to him.
Robey far greater ceiling. Better kick, size, suited specific role*, scoreboard impact. I also have him better in clearance/contest work aswell but we obviously disagree there
* My worry is Cummings kicking and being stuck in between a big inside mid and a Naicos, Zerrett type whos smaller but has that running power/kicking
There arent may gun mids at 183 or smaller now
Rowell, Naicos, WAshcroft, Serong, Zerrett, Butters, Neale is about it for the best 40 inside mids in the comp now
Rowells a brute
Naicos ridiculous kicking/running
Zac Merrett kick elite
Butters is just different and a very good kick aswell
Can he be Caleb Serong? Is the question when regarding type
Sullivan lacks a bit of sideways movement in games for mine.What are those flaws?