Remove this Banner Ad

Another planet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveW
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

There have been theories for years that there is another planet further out than Pluto, based on the orbits of things already charted. If it is another planet that kind of stuff up the plaque they put on Voyager...
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by Fire
Maybe it should be called Utopia.
Then I wouldnt have Mormans knock on my door anymore.
What has that to do with Mormons knocking on your door?.
 
It's 3 times further from the sun than what Pluto is. But how such a planet could have been formed is a bit of a mystery, considering there's a vacuum twice the size of the previously known solar system between it and the next nearest planet.
Or is there another asteroid belt between Pluto and Sedna?
 
Some astronomer said last night that if we consider Pluto and Senda planets then there could well be hundreds of planets in the solar system, most of them in the Kuiper Belt.
 
Thats it isnt it, there is no clear definition of a planet.

Just a question, but is there any evidaince to suggert it isnt just a large stray comet that got sucked into the suns orbit?

BTW, i dont think Pluto is a planet either.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The article doesn't note whether or not Sedna orbits in the same plane as the other planets; pluto orbits 17 degs of the mean plane, while all the other planets orbit in the mean plane. Kuiper belt objects dont necessarily orbit in the mean plane - which is why some dont think Pluto is true planet; rather, a planetoid.

Sound like a desparate reach to get some research dollars by branding a big Kuiper-belt object the 10th planet....
 
Originally posted by MonkeyButterer
The article doesn't note whether or not Sedna orbits in the same plane as the other planets; pluto orbits 17 degs of the mean plane, while all the other planets orbit in the mean plane. Kuiper belt objects dont necessarily orbit in the mean plane - which is why some dont think Pluto is true planet; rather, a planetoid.

Sound like a desparate reach to get some research dollars by branding a big Kuiper-belt object the 10th planet....

science geek! science geek!!

<laughs and points>
 
Originally posted by Mog
There have been theories for years that there is another planet further out than Pluto, based on the orbits of things already charted. If it is another planet that kind of stuff up the plaque they put on Voyager...

I like that idea- a alien race finds Voyager and homes in on its point of origin, travels for light years to the edge of our solar system...

'Well, here we are, the benevolent and enlightened People of Ee have travelled for millenia to bring a new age of peace and prosperity to the dwellers of this solar system... oh.. hang on, ten planets?! Oops, must have got the wrong address. Bugger it, we'll try again next millenia.'
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If anyone is interested, here is another article...

A working group of the International Astronomy Union (IAU) will consider whether objects such as Sedna should be classed as planets.

The IAU says the group will consider the definition of a minimum size for a planet.

But in the meantime Sedna will not be considered one.

The outcome could lead to a demotion for Pluto, which some astronomers argue is too small to be called a planet.

"If we were starting anew, undoubtedly Pluto wouldn't be labelled a planet," Professor Iwan Williams, of the IAU, told BBC News Online.

"But we have almost a 100 years of culture that says Pluto's a planet. So the IAU will set up a working group to try to ponder the imponderable."

Icy worlds

Sedna, named unofficially after the Inuit goddess of the sea, is the latest in a string of icy objects approaching the size of Pluto discovered in the outer reaches of the Solar System.

Sedna is believed to be about three-quarters of the size of Pluto, based on measurements of light reflected from its surface detected by telescopes on Earth.


Distant and faint, Sedna is causing a stir
Many astronomers, including Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology, who led the team that discovered Sedna, admit it is not a true planet, preferring to describe it as a planetoid - somewhere between a planet and an asteroid.

But like other objects found in recent months that inhabit the band of cosmic debris beyond the Inner Solar System, the Kuiper Belt, it is much bigger than a typical asteroid.

Some believe it is only a matter of time before another such body is found which dwarfs Pluto.

Reclassifying Pluto is one way to solve the dilemma. When it was discovered in 1930 it was thought to be much bigger - and thus more planet-like - than it really is.

However, the astronomical community will not take kindly to the idea of downgrading Pluto's status. The last time it was suggested, in 1999, it caused an uproar.


Hmm... gotta wonder why people would be in uproar about that.
 
Originally posted by MonkeyButterer
3 biscuits? i don't think so. I demand quality baked goods, not the man-jam sao's you scarf down like a bulemic bukake star.

Impressive!!

i would bow to you, but i am afraid you would take that as an invitation and try your monkeybuttstuffing tactics on me
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom