Natman
Norm Smith Medallist
Ranga, you have misinterpreted my post. Partly my fault for the way I worded it. I wanted to keep the categories to 4 not 10 for 24 players, so I gave them rather blunt titles. The fact that 20 of our players have played 6 or 7 out of 7 games suggests we are stable and it's tough to get in. But some of the kids have been on the list since the 2005 season. And yes I understand some are project players and will take time to develop.
I could have had headings like, "Should have played more AFL at this stage, but the selection panel have strange ideas."
I am a huge fan of Thomson, Thomas and Krak. They can play at AFL level, but they haven't been given regular gigs, are in and out of the side, but go back to the SANFL and dominate. You haven't been here long, but if you had you would have known my opinions on these 3 in particular. For example last year by about this time in the season, I said an 18 year old Krakouer was as good as an 18 year old Bradley and 18 year old Wanganeen. I saw the other 2 live in the flesh at 18, saw Krak once or twice live and the rest of the time on the box, but I rate him that high.
What I was getting at, was ranking the kids and fringe players. Trying to see what stages they were at and what they have to do to go to the next level in their development. As I live outside SA I don't get to watch the SANFL, mainly thanks due to ABC2 cutting the Tuesday night replays, although my mate has a satellite dish and set top box and can pick up ABC SA and watch the SANFL at the same time as you guys in SA. But I can't get around there to often.
Whether we like it or not, 4 to 8 guys will be cut this year and probably all 4 rookies, given our history with rookies. It was more a list to mark were guys are at now, based on what I have read and what they might have to do for the remaining 15 weeks or so to stick around in 2009.
I wanted the opinion of those who have seen them play SANFL and if I have bracketed individual players with other players who have relatively the same performances, correctly. It wasn't about potential it was about what results they have achieved. If you don't like my headings then rank the players outside those 20 who have played 6 or 7 AFL games this year, into 4 or 5 categories. Call them what ever you like.
It wasn't a bagging exercise it was more a relativity one, more general theory than special one.
And this page will tell you how many AFL games each player has played.
http://stats.rleague.com/afl/stats/alltime/padelaide.html
REH - this is a bit off topic, but do you know where to obtain the info to calculate the average winning margin in AFL games over various periods of time and between teams - I would think that the info needs to be in a downloadable format to make it easy to calculate.




