Remove this Banner Ad

Bench usage

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

master_of_puppets

Debutant
Suspended
Joined
May 30, 2005
Posts
84
Reaction score
0
Other Teams
Baggers
I was just wondering if anyone out there could tell me where we are ranked in the bench usage per game. I would think that we would probably be around the average when it comes to using the bench.

Also, do you think that we should be using the bench more?

I’ve made a list of midfielders we can rotate through the middle. Do you think that it makes sense to keep our midfielders fresh throughout the game?

Kouta
Campo
Stevens
Houla
Walker
Davis
Johnson

This will allow Kouta and campo to have stints in the fwd 50.
 
master_of_puppets said:
I was just wondering if anyone out there could tell me where we are ranked in the bench usage per game. I would think that we would probably be around the average when it comes to using the bench.

Also, do you think that we should be using the bench more?

I’ve made a list of midfielders we can rotate through the middle. Do you think that it makes sense to keep our midfielders fresh throughout the game?

Kouta
Campo
Stevens
Houla
Walker
Davis
Johnson

This will allow Kouta and campo to have stints in the fwd 50.

we rank in the bottom 4 for bench usage
 
bibi01 said:
we rank in the bottom 4 for bench usage

Cheers,

I suppose the excuse here is that we don't have the talent to rotate through the middle?

I just dont get it.

Which teams rank in the top 4??
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Allen's Blues said:
the fact is that it wont make any difference as we will lose anyway

That's a bit of a pessimistic view.

I think using the bench more would help us at least be competitive.
 
how is that? taking of our only good players, and putting on second rate replacements how is that going to make us competive
 
Allen's Blues said:
how is that? taking of our only good players, and putting on second rate replacements how is that going to make us competive


Taking off our good players, who are a spent force, is not helping while as you call them second raters are sitting on the pine fresh as a new panty liner. I would think that a second rate player is better then a non-existent one.
 
master_of_puppets said:
Taking off our good players, who are a spent force, is not helping while as you call them second raters are sitting on the pine fresh as a new panty liner. I would think that a second rate player is better then a non-existent one.

This is why i believe we should be playing the kids, instead of second raters such as Johnson, Clarke, Bowyer, anyway i would prefer a Stevens on the ground than a Johnson who hasnt played a minute
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom