Remove this Banner Ad

Biggest threat to World peace

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Originally posted by brassmonkey
Hitler wasnt a christian morons. Instead of listening to the far lefts propaganda, why dont you think for your selves? Hitler practiced the occult. He got into it when in the Army. Thats how he and Rudolf Hoess met (they were in prison together).

HAHAHAHAHA

The brass monkey is telling us to think for ourselves. Oh...the irony. He/she is brainwashed by FOX news and then tells us to think for ourselves.

No....only one moron here...perhaps you ought to learn to think for yourself.

Yes...it is rumoured that Hitler practised the occult....however, you cannot deny that Germany under Hitler WAS A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY.

Maybe writing it in capitals will get it through your thick head. Yes I agree that Hitler was not the ideal Christian...IN THE SAME WAY THAT EVERY LEADER OF MUSLIM COUNTRIES TODAY ARE NOT IDEAL ISLAMIC LEADERS.

Do you understand now knobjockey!

oh...and I'm still waiting for your explanation on how you love someone while disliking them.
 
Originally posted by Lestat
HAHAHAHAHA

The brass monkey is telling us to think for ourselves. Oh...the irony. He/she is brainwashed by FOX news and then tells us to think for ourselves.

No....only one moron here...perhaps you ought to learn to think for yourself.

Yes...it is rumoured that Hitler practised the occult....however, you cannot deny that Germany under Hitler WAS A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY.

Maybe writing it in capitals will get it through your thick head. Yes I agree that Hitler was not the ideal Christian...IN THE SAME WAY THAT EVERY LEADER OF MUSLIM COUNTRIES TODAY ARE NOT IDEAL ISLAMIC LEADERS.

Do you understand now knobjockey!


Again (sigh) Hitler did not act in the name of Christianity EVEN AGAINST THE JEWS!!!

Whereas OBL's islamofascism is done solely in the name of his perversion of Islam

That's why the unwillingness or inability of "true" muslims to challenge OBL and the fascists is so dangerous to their own faith.
 
Originally posted by GuruJane
Again (sigh) Hitler did not act in the name of Christianity EVEN AGAINST THE JEWS!!!

Whereas OBL's islamofascism is done solely in the name of his perversion of Islam

That's why the unwillingness or inability of "true" muslims to challenge OBL and the fascists is so dangerous to their own faith.

Yes, but more importantly it is the Q'ran that prohibits the challenging of the Q'ran that is is so dangerous to their Muslim faith. It's catch 22.
 
You can love somebody and dislike them. I love my brother, but i cant stand to be around him. Same goes with all of my family. I wouldnt want to live with one of my cousins, but if they needed me, id be right there. Except Christianity says you should do that for all people, not just family. I would never harm another human unless in self defense. Thats Christian compassion. One of my favorite stories is when the townsfolk were about to stone a woman for commiting adultery. Jesus said "let ye whithout sin cast the first stone". In Islam, if a woman is r*ped, both the man and woman are stoned. If a girl has sex out of wedlock, she is stoned. These so called "honor killings" are muslim teaching. That is muslim compassion.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by brassmonkey
You can love somebody and dislike them. I love my brother, but i cant stand to be around him. Same goes with all of my family. I wouldnt want to live with one of my cousins, but if they needed me, id be right there. Except Christianity says you should do that for all people, not just family. I would never harm another human unless in self defense. Thats Christian compassion. One of my favorite stories is when the townsfolk were about to stone a woman for commiting adultery. Jesus said "let ye whithout sin cast the first stone". In Islam, if a woman is r*ped, both the man and woman are stoned. If a girl has sex out of wedlock, she is stoned. These so called "honor killings" are muslim teaching. That is muslim compassion.

But does the old testament not say "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" whilst the new testament says "forgive them that tresspass against us" ?

Which one is correct?, because their is not much compassion with the former.

ps Soddom and Gomorragh.........should sydney be turned into salt?
 
The old testament was rough because it had to be. Gods people were very lazy and ignorant. According to the Bible, Jesus came to tell the world that this was no longer needed. That loving God is more important than following the letter of the law.

There were no Christians in Sodom and Gommorah. But God destroyed it more as a symbol than as actual punishment
 
Originally posted by brassmonkey
The old testament was rough because it had to be. Gods people were very lazy and ignorant. According to the Bible, Jesus came to tell the world that this was no longer needed. That loving God is more important than following the letter of the law.

There were no Christians in Sodom and Gommorah. But God destroyed it more as a symbol than as actual punishment

1) Tell that to the Jews :D

2) You're not trying to claim that there are Christians in Sydney are you? ;)
 
Hey, even the Jews cant deny it. If you read the old testament, its hard not to just break down and laugh at how crazy some of the things they did were. God had to be rough. They had the attention span of two year olds. I have a couple of Jewish friends who are still like this. :D
 
Originally posted by brassmonkey
Hey, even the Jews cant deny it. If you read the old testament, its hard not to just break down and laugh at how crazy some of the things they did were. God had to be rough. They had the attention span of two year olds. I have a couple of Jewish friends who are still like this. :D
Brass Monkey.
Are u Southern Baptist by any chance ?.
 
In a sense, yes. My mother is, and the rest of her family is, including my brothers. I however decided that I wanted to follow my fathers religion, Orthodoxy. He converted to Orthodoxy as a young man, and wanted someone to carry on the tradition. Now that hes dead, I want to obey his wishes. I attend a Baptist church at the moment though, so I would say I am both. Why do you ask?
 
Originally posted by brassmonkey
In a sense, yes. My mother is, and the rest of her family is, including my brothers. I however decided that I wanted to follow my fathers religion, Orthodoxy. He converted to Orthodoxy as a young man, and wanted someone to carry on the tradition. Now that hes dead, I want to obey his wishes. I attend a Baptist church at the moment though, so I would say I am both. Why do you ask?
Because in your posts you sound like a person brought up among the Southern Baptists,especially when u say "all religions,except Christianity,come from the Devil".Not that i'm against the Baptists at all,it's just the way they are think.
 
Originally posted by Bombers 2003
Because in your posts you sound like a person brought up among the Southern Baptists,especially when u say "all religions,except Christianity,come from the Devil".Not that i'm against the Baptists at all,it's just the way they are think.

Indeed he does. When we get around to the thread which asks which Christian sect is the least Christian, most dangerous and most prone to completely misusing the bible ... I vote Southern Baptist.

Too often religions are just a handy veneer which allows small-minded ignoramuses to spout clap-trap and claim that their views should not be challenged. The opinions come frst and then the religion is 'massaged' to fit. For a religion which is supposed to love everyone the Southern Baptists have sure condemned a lot of people to hell.
 
have any one you saying hitler wasn't invoking God in his rants read anything he wrote or said?

he used God and christianity to justify a lot of his perfidious actions.

hitler was not different from OBL

in fact Hitler is not that different from Rumsfeld or bush, only in body count, though rummy must be close to 1M given his napalm efforts during vietnam.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

yep OBL doesn't have the body coun't of Napalm Rummy who ordered the bombing of cambodia and vietnam, and neither has the body of hitler, although I think both OBL and Rummy would if they could get away with it.

after all OBL was trained by the americans.

OBL, Hitler and rumsfeld three evil men.
 
Originally posted by dan warna
yep OBL doesn't have the body coun't of Napalm Rummy who ordered the bombing of cambodia and vietnam, and neither has the body of hitler, although I think both OBL and Rummy would if they could get away with it.

after all OBL was trained by the americans.

OBL, Hitler and rumsfeld three evil men.

There are or have been many evil men, but none compare to Hitler or Stalin in the last 200 years.
 
Originally posted by dan warna
yep OBL doesn't have the body coun't of Napalm Rummy who ordered the bombing of cambodia and vietnam, and neither has the body of hitler, although I think both OBL and Rummy would if they could get away with it.

after all OBL was trained by the americans.

OBL, Hitler and rumsfeld three evil men.

Rumsfeld wasnt secretary of defense until after the vietnam war. You need to brush up on your history. Before he became Secretary of Defense in 1975(two years after we fully left Vietnam) he was the Director of the Office of Economic Opportunity. Hardly in a position to order bombings of anything. :rolleyes:
 
Originally posted by Weaver
Indeed he does. When we get around to the thread which asks which Christian sect is the least Christian, most dangerous and most prone to completely misusing the bible ... I vote Southern Baptist.

Too often religions are just a handy veneer which allows small-minded ignoramuses to spout clap-trap and claim that their views should not be challenged. The opinions come frst and then the religion is 'massaged' to fit. For a religion which is supposed to love everyone the Southern Baptists have sure condemned a lot of people to hell.

Actually, if you read the Bible, The Southern Baptist are the closest to what the Bible actually says. In fact, the problem that I have with them is that they are too literal. They dont read between the lines. The Muslims have condemned a lot more people to hell than the Southern Baptist Convention.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

yes we left in 1972 and were pulling troops until early 73, but the American were still running around getting their booties kicked till the murdering raping asses where kicked out.

Cheney was an advocate of the nasty stuff.

From his own bio he was the chief of staff as well as previously being the head US NATO guy.

he had is fingers elbow deep in the US massacres in Vietnam.

http://www.us-mission.ch/BIOS/rumsfeld.htm
In August 1974, he was called back to Washington, DC, to serve in the Ford Administration successively as:
Chairman of the transition to the Presidency of Gerald R. Ford (1974);
Chief of Staff of the White House and a member of the President's Cabinet (1974-1975); and, as
The 13th U.S. Secretary of Defense, the youngest in our country's history (1975-1977).
 
Originally posted by dan warna
have any one you saying hitler wasn't invoking God in his rants read anything he wrote or said?

he used God and christianity to justify a lot of his perfidious actions.

hitler was not different from OBL

in fact Hitler is not that different from Rumsfeld or bush, only in body count, though rummy must be close to 1M given his napalm efforts during vietnam.

Oh well, as Slax would say, being uninformed is better than being misinformed.

Hitler was an occultist, if he was anything. He was not a crusader in the name of Christianity.

But OBL justifies everything he says and does in the name of Islam.
 
Originally posted by dan warna
yes we left in 1972 and were pulling troops until early 73, but the American were still running around getting their booties kicked till the murdering raping asses where kicked out.

Cheney was an advocate of the nasty stuff.

From his own bio he was the chief of staff as well as previously being the head US NATO guy.

he had is fingers elbow deep in the US massacres in Vietnam.

http://www.us-mission.ch/BIOS/rumsfeld.htm
In August 1974, he was called back to Washington, DC, to serve in the Ford Administration successively as:
Chairman of the transition to the Presidency of Gerald R. Ford (1974);
Chief of Staff of the White House and a member of the President's Cabinet (1974-1975); and, as
The 13th U.S. Secretary of Defense, the youngest in our country's history (1975-1977).

Saigon fell on April 30, 1975.

Rummie would cheerfully take the blame for many things but not for napalmings and massacres in Vietnam.

Not of course that he wld have worried one jot about it had he HAD been there.

The fact is, Rummie was defense sec AFTER the US pulled out of Viet and DW is talking b/shyte again.
 
he was white house chief of staff, and before that a he was the head USA administrator for NATO did you read the bio ?

and the US continued to bomb long after saigon fell when he was defence secretary

also have you read any of what hitler has written or said?

he might have been an occultist (speculation) but he invoked god and christianity to justify his actions.

meanwhile still no WMDs while the USA has REFUSED to give iraq a one person one vote electoral system. so much for democracy.

hasn't stopped the US and haliburton stealing the oil has it?
 
Originally posted by dan warna
also have you read any of what hitler has written or said?

he might have been an occultist (speculation) but he invoked god and christianity to justify his actions.

Again, Hitler did not do what he did in the name of Christianity. He was not a fundamentalist believer, nor were his cohorts.

Unlike OBL and co. The comparison is misplaced.

What the two do have in common, however, is their facism and their paranoia about the jews.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Biggest threat to World peace

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top