Remove this Banner Ad

Blues looking long term

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Interesting to hear from our senior assistant coach Mark Riley over at 'The Herald-Sun'.....




  • WITH Carlton on the verge of notching the longest losing streak in its history, assistant coach Mark Riley says there are no quick solutions.
A defeat to Collingwood at the MCG on Sunday will be the Blues' 15th straight loss, breaking a record that has stood for more than a century.

But Riley said those within the club considered the streak irrelevant, with their focus more on the long-term aim of building a side that can win the Blues' 17th premiership.

"We've got a bit of work to do, we're coming from four wins and three wins in the last two years, we're not coming from middle of the road, 10 wins, 12 wins," Riley said today.

"We're starting off the backmarkers and we know how hard the task is and we're putting our nose to the grindstone and we're going for it."

Riley said a key focus was improving the club's defence.

Last season, the Blues were clearly the AFL's worst defensive team.
Related Links







Riley said it was obvious the defensive aspects of Carlton's game were still not up to scratch on the basis of last round's 23.12 (150) to 21.8 (134) loss to Essendon.

"You can't come away with 150 points kicked against you and be happy and we weren't and we've gone to work this week," he said.

"But, as I said, you don't fix those things overnight.

"What we want to see is some incremental improvement in that area, just like we've seen incremental improvement in stopped plays, in contested ball, in ball going to our front 50."

Riley said the club's defence needed to improve across the ground, with defensive work in the forward line just as important as that done in the backline.

It is an area that will be tested on Sunday, given the ability the Magpies showed to initiate attacks from half-back in their thrashing of Richmond last weekend.

"Too many naive people think defence is the six people that stand in the back half of the oval, it doesn't work like that any more," Riley said.

"Defence is very closely correlated to how the ball is locked in your forward line, it's very correlated to the manner in which the opposition can attack into their forward line.

"It's an area we need to improve as a football team, not (just when) we're playing Collingwood ... it's certainly one of our focus areas this week and also future weeks going forward."
 
"Too many naive people think defence is the six people that stand in the back half of the oval, it doesn't work like that any more," Riley said.

"Defence is very closely correlated to how the ball is locked in your forward line, it's very correlated to the manner in which the opposition can attack into their forward line.

"It's an area we need to improve as a football team, not (just when) we're playing Collingwood ... it's certainly one of our focus areas this week and also future weeks going forward."


Must read for all of those knocking the defensive tag on Shaw ;):)
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

He's correct that the defensive effort is not restricted to the back 6. We can't just hide a poor defensive player in the forward line because they don't tackle. The senior players have to lead the way. Juddy's been great defensively, as has Hadley- but guys like Scotland, Houlihan, Thornton, should be able to pressure the opposition. If they don't do it, the young blokes won't follow.
 
I dont see where it says anything about a defensive tag. I think he is saying all players need to work hard when the opposition have the pill as when we have it.

Spot on it wouldn't matter if we had SOS, Doull, Southby, Austin, Sexton etc down back if the ball keeps getting pumped in, lace out with very little pressure on the ball carriers they wouldn't stand a chance.

Lets get a harder working midfield who can run both ways. We don't want one that is good at running to receive the footy but can't do the hard gut busting running to chase, harass, pressure the opposition.
 
Must read for all of those knocking the defensive tag on Shaw ;):)

I'd imagine the MC would consider this. Guess there are only so many players you can put a negating type player on. We'd also have to look at stopping guys like Didak and Thomas as well.

Will be very interested on how the guys like up on Sunday at the first bounce.
 
Spot on it wouldn't matter if we had SOS, Doull, Southby, Austin, Sexton etc down back if the ball keeps getting pumped in, lace out with very little pressure on the ball carriers they wouldn't stand a chance.

Lets get a harder working midfield who can run both ways. We don't want one that is good at running to receive the footy but can't do the hard gut busting running to chase, harass, pressure the opposition.


LOL, you don't think they might improve things just a little?

Agree on the second bit.
 
long term like - thinking about what your going to mop your jizz up with before you rape your self -


long term - like saint kilda pre,irship plans-

-

long term like bush appreciation society
 
Leon Davis always plays well against us as well.

Dangers IMO are Shaw, Didak, Davis and Thomas.

Banno, Thornton, ???? & Grigg.

IMO:

Shaw - Carrazzo
Didak - Bannister
Davis - Thornton
Thomas - Grigg

Bannister and Grigg can be switched around. Bower can help out too. Gibbs can too, and I think he will, although I would prefer to see him further up the ground obviously.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Blues looking long term

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top