Youd think Clarkson would have played him on Saturday night with the youth policy and all, he wasn't even on the extended 6 man bench, could it be Clarkson thinks the boy cant cut it at AFL level.
Please Discuss.
Please Discuss.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
binxy24 said:If Beaumonts getting a game before him, he may as well retire.
chimphawk28 said:It was funny watching Beaumont again the Saints last week. He looked like a fat kid in a health food shop - didn't know what to do.
Tricky said:I can't quite understand all the Beumont criticism - not when the point of comparison ought to be Jacobs. In my book, we wasted pick 6 on a soft, slow defensive flanker who refused to go near his opponent. If he was injured, he shouldn't have been playing. He was good on Neitz first up, but then again, Neitz looked to be struggling that game and was coming back from injury.
Given what we gave up for Beumont (Loats in a 3 way deal - if my memory serves me right), his return was very respectable. Can't say the same for Jacobs. If he plays like he did last year, he should be shot out of the same cannon as Holland come the end of the year.
Hope your right, i haven't passed judgement on him as yet, still time.OneEyedHawk said:I think Brennan will be a real player for us in the future. Not necessarily tall enough to play in a Key Position but does play tall and is a great overhead mark. Will be a big improver this year.
Tricky said:I can't quite understand all the Beumont criticism - not when the point of comparison ought to be Jacobs. In my book, we wasted pick 6 on a soft, slow defensive flanker who refused to go near his opponent. If he was injured, he shouldn't have been playing. He was good on Neitz first up, but then again, Neitz looked to be struggling that game and was coming back from injury.
Given what we gave up for Beumont (Loats in a 3 way deal - if my memory serves me right), his return was very respectable. Can't say the same for Jacobs. If he plays like he did last year, he should be shot out of the same cannon as Holland come the end of the year.
Alot of supporters, even Hawthorn ones seem to share your view however I don't. I think Jacobs will be a real asset, held down full-back when required for Essendon and was a very good player there. Was blitzing at the start of last year then got injured and never seemed to recover or get back to that level. I'm looking forward to him proving alot of people wrong. Or myselfbinxy24 said:Oh don't worry, I think Jacobs is terrible too... it's just that he didn't play on Saturday night so my memory's dimmed.
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=115786
Hawk Dork said:He is a good mark and hopefully will be able to do what Graham did for years .
Reckon we should play him forward?OneEyedHawk said:Like the look of Brennan in the praccy match against geelong today. Looked really good, is a great mark particularly for his size.
Graham was built to only be a HBF and was used everywhere they had a problem.FB CHB BP HF and Wing.He should have been played on the 3rd best forward but was usually put on the best.I think he performed consitantly for someone playing out of his true position.binxy24 said:What, chip sideways and turn the ball over?
Probably not a bad idea. Is strong overhead and creative. good reader of the ball and has a good footy brain. Dunno though, is alot of quality options in the forward line this year. Might struggle to force his way in therecschreuder61 said:Reckon we should play him forward?