- Banned
- #1
When he's past his best as a run-with ballwinner will the Cats put him up front where he can damage sides with his aerial and kicking skills? Okay perhaps not a KPP but wouldn't he be a great flanker at least?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Soccer Notice Image
FA Cup Semi-Finals ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ Europa - Rd of 16 ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - KNOCKOUTS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ Champs League - League Phase ⚽
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 5
SuperCoach Rd 5 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 5 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
When he's past his best as a run-with ballwinner will the Cats put him up front where he can damage sides with his aerial and kicking skills? Okay perhaps not a KPP but wouldn't he be a great flanker at least?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Let me future proof this argument - who do you want as a mid size forward in 3 or 4 years time, Ling or Gamble?
Ling's #1 asset is his running & brain followed by his size, hips, marking & goal kicking. He will never be a leading forward, he will never be a pack marking forward, he will never be a crumbing forward. He is a great 1v1 mark, but he has always been against a 'normal' sized midfielder.
He may be able to spend some time as a flanker but only if we need a filler till a better flanker takes his place. I can definitely see him being a run with player into his 30's, and thats a damn long and fine career.
Let me future proof this argument - who do you want as a mid size forward in 3 or 4 years time, Ling or Gamble?
Ling's #1 asset is his running & brain followed by his size, hips, marking & goal kicking. He will never be a leading forward, he will never be a pack marking forward, he will never be a crumbing forward. He is a great 1v1 mark, but he has always been against a 'normal' sized midfielder.
He may be able to spend some time as a flanker but only if we need a filler till a better flanker takes his place. I can definitely see him being a run with player into his 30's, and thats a damn long and fine career.
Let me future proof this argument - who do you want as a mid size forward in 3 or 4 years time, Ling or Gamble?
Ling's #1 asset is his running & brain followed by his size, hips, marking & goal kicking. He will never be a leading forward, he will never be a pack marking forward, he will never be a crumbing forward. He is a great 1v1 mark, but he has always been against a 'normal' sized midfielder.
He may be able to spend some time as a flanker but only if we need a filler till a better flanker takes his place. I can definitely see him being a run with player into his 30's, and thats a damn long and fine career.