IheartCarrots
Cancelled
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Posts
- 351
- Reaction score
- 1
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Banned
- #126
I assume you mean "too fit for any of our rucks"? Jacobs is the strongest and biggest bodied of our ruckman. .. Its the reason he is the better tap ruck and better at pack marking. .. His fitness isn't too bad either, although I think he looks tired at the moment and needs some help. .. Hopefully he has a good run on the track this week and stays in the side. .. He played well last time, except Cox schooled him in the throw ins and NicNat mauled him unfairly and got away with it. .. but he shows he learns well and finished that game well. ..
No, I mean too strong which is why I said it. Jacobs is bigger than Kruezer. Kruezer is stronger than Jacobs and much better at throwing his weight around. If you'd watched a game recently it's quite clear. It's a given that Cox is fitter than Jacobs which is why I didn't bother saying it. Jacobs' fitness isn't bad, it's just not as good as the opposition in this case.
Jacobs will get flogged, bank on it. He is such a good tap ruckman because he reads the ball well. It has nothing to do with his size or strength. It comes down to how you read the ball and your positional sense. Cox is far better in both areas as well as more athletic and after Cox runs Jacobs into the ground, PT will just jump all over him.






"Goddess" 



