- Nov 14, 2007
- 48,269
- 26,740
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Good boy
But everything is a bit more fun livin' a bit on the "wild side"! Maybe you ought to give it a go...just once!
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Chocowatch..........
- Thread starter Geoffa32
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Good boy
But everything is a bit more fun livin' a bit on the "wild side"! Maybe you ought to give it a go...just once!
powermacs
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jan 16, 2009
- 5,154
- 10,499
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Port Magpies, Bulls & Cricket Aus
Unlike the crows list that is constantly rebuilding but never achieving anything.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I'm speaking on behalf of myself and no one else. I havent been yellow or red carded either. Just got my access cut off beacuse TP and I went overboard.
I'm not whinging, I just asked the question, so settle down oh precious one.
Oh, these were your'e top 5 'w***ers'.
Care to elaborate, or was just a retort to the Port bashing on here.
But they are all w***ers.
Nathan "OJ" Bock: Currently facing charges of allegedly assaulting his girlfriend. w***er act that.
Andrew "Chipscab" McLeod: Sued his best friend, does a Lleyton Hewitt salute, amongst other things. w***er acts those.
Brendan "ShortPlank" Fevola: Assaults an Irish barman while representing Australia, off bonking a naïve model while his wife is home breast feeding his baby, amongst other things. w***er acts those.
Robert "Triffic" Walls: Labels a “bow” as arrogant, but hugging the crowd or using a slogan “They know we’re coming” isn’t, amongst other things. w***er acts those.
Neil "Mumbles" Craig: Was openly antagonistic towards the Camry Crows when coaching Norwood, which is quite the opposite to what John Cahill was doing while coaching Port Adelaide in the SANFL or what Choco Williams did when he coaching Glenelg. w***er act that.
There are other w***ers out there; those five were just the five that came to mind first.
Wow, that is an amazingly shallow response.
If this is the barometer, how much of a w***er is Brogan, Tredrea, Chad, Motlop, Trengrove, Choco, Carr..........just to name a few?!!
Brogan: Never hit his missus, never sued his best friend, has only snotted a loud mouth obnoxious Camry Crows supporter and an antagonistic Doctor. Less of a w***er than Chipscab and OJ.
Tredrea: Never hit his missus, never sued his best friend. Only guilty of having a bit of fun with his supporters, just like James Hird. Good bloke in the James Hird category.
Chad: Never hit his missus, never sued his best friend, did grow up a Camry Crows supporter and was badly influenced by his mega-w***er father. We are trying to dew***erfy him but it’s a work in progress.
Motlop: Never hit his missus, never sued his best friend.
Trengrove: Never hit his missus, never sued his best friend.
Choco: Worked with the Camry Crows when coaching Glenelg unlike the Norwood coach. Less of a w***er than Mumbles. But hopefully Mumbles will learn from that.
Carr: Never hit his missus, never sued his best friend.
Read it again. I dont say that anyone has hit their girlfriends. I do state that there are lots of people who haven't hit their girlfriends. And anyone who doesn't hit their girlfriend is less of a w***er than someone who does.
I hope that is clear.
- Nov 14, 2007
- 48,269
- 26,740
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Brogan - anger management obviously not his forte
Chad - goose-stepping dream final big mouth
Tredrea - bow nothing like the hug...but we've been there before...yawn
Choco - never took any responsibility for 119 til it was too late...master of the "its not me" excuse - and ugly
Motlop -"I can kick goals out my arse-just don't expect me to do it when the TEAM needs me" ...next question ..."what's a TEAM"
Carr - my wife wants to come home ... sucked Powa right in there...BTW how was his medical?
Let me ask you this oh wise one.
Say Daniel Motlop takes Chad Cornes on a trip to the N.T. and shows him around a few Aboriginal sacres sites and buriel grounds of where his family is from. Chad jumps at the idea and takes his video camera and gets some great footage. After Chad gets home, he loves his video footage that much, that he wants to publicly release it and make a good amount of money out of it. Daniel hears of this, and knowing how sacred the footage is, he doesnt want the public to see it. Chad says, "nah, f..k you Mots, I'm going to make some money". So, the only way Motlop can stop this from happening is to take it to court and sue Chad....etc. You get the idea.
Who would you support, oh ticketed one???
- Thread starter
- #188
Andrew Mcleod is such a w***er he chose to forgo money to keep his cultural traditions.
Brogan has never been charged with assaulting his girlfriend. (Now I wonder what happens behind closed doors.) Now I can think of one w***er with worse anger management problems.
Nah, OJ Bock is a bigger w***er than Brogan.
Speaking of big mouths that do w***er acts on the field, growing up a Camry Crows supporter maybe Chad modelled himself on this w***er and thought it was OK.
Nah, Jars is a bigger w***er than Chad.
Tredrea biggest crime is to have a bit of fun with Port fans in the crowd, that’s the only thing he’s ever done.
Whereas Chipscab Mcleod not only used to have the biggest w***er in world tennis as his best friend, but he ended up suing him. He SUED his BEST-FRIEND. During the Camry Crows best and fairest count his wife cheered every time Edwards missed out on a vote, resulting in Edwards’s missus throwing a drink on the urchin.
Now for the famous I_LOVE_ME pose.
Now the suspect pose.
Nah, Chipscab is a bigger w***er than Tredders.
Choco didn’t play.
Besides Choco was not antagonistic towards the Camry Crows when coach of Glenelg, but this supermodel and former Norwood coach was:
Nah, Mumbles is a bigger w***er than Choco.
Motlop has never done a “Nicolas Anelka” post-goal butterfly celebration.
Nah, Petrenko is a bigger w***er than Motlop.
Carr did not cost us a cent. How much did you pay for Carey’s 28 games? Give me the answer in $/game, just to add perspective.
Besides Carr has never used his elbow to cowardly attack and break an opposition player’s cheek-bone, and miss out on an entire finals series.
Nah, Elbows is a bigger w***er than Carr.
- Thread starter
- #190
Funny how a Tealster has a go at Bicks.
Whats your stance on Dave Granger?
Whats your stance on Dave Granger?
But Motlop hasn’t taken Chadwick to the NT. Chadwick doesn’t have a video. Chadwick is not Motlop’s best friend and Motlop has never sued his best friend.
Chipscab and LeyLey: w***ers extraordinaire.
I don’t recall Granger getting suspended leading into a finals series.
- Nov 14, 2007
- 48,269
- 26,740
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Carr didn't cost you a cent? He's playing for free then? Cost a spot on you list that could have been taken up by some young Revolutionary!
There were 3 decisions the club over the years made that I disagreed with and the Carey recruitment was one - he ended up being a drawcard basically, and if that got more members, then it was probably worth it. (One Sexy bloke back then, though!)
Because Choco did't play in 119, he was not responsible? WHAT? Doesn't make him less ugly BTW!
There were 3 decisions the club over the years made that I disagreed with and the Carey recruitment was one - he ended up being a drawcard basically, and if that got more members, then it was probably worth it. (One Sexy bloke back then, though!)
Because Choco did't play in 119, he was not responsible? WHAT?
Doesn't make him less ugly BTW!
- Thread starter
- #194
But the action was the same. It is a bit odd that Tealsters hark on about this action, when the PAFC has always been known to play hard and at times outside of the rules. It is that mongrel type player that lead to the success. The modern Port supporter prefers the netball "entertain me" style over the one that saw them succeed even in 2004.
Also, every AFL Premier has had these kind of players in the side. You dont win flags without them. Looking at Ports list the only two you have is Carr and Brogan. All your young guys flounder at a hint of physicality. Is Boak and Hartlett going to be a mongrel type. I doubt it. Hawthorn used their time in the bottom four to recruit Sam Mitchell and Luke Hodge. Geelong have Chapman Ablett Steve Johnson and Ling. Port have ??? Your cult hero is Westhoff who flops at any slight body contact, eyes gazing at the umpire awaiting a free kick.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Is it the 70’s. When I was out on the weekend I didn’t see a single mirror-ball, not one guy in a flared white suit or a tie-dye shirt.
Is it the 80’s. On the same night out I didn’t see anyone with a Rubik’s cube, nor did I see kiak wearing blokes with mullets or girls with teased hair held in place with over sized ribbons.
No those days are gone and its time to move on. Hard footballers are still required, mongrels not so much.
However I’ll give you Chapman as a mongrel-type but I’m not allowing you to put Ablett, Johnson and Ling in the same assemblage. They are no-shirk players but they are not mongels
As for in-and-under ball getters, you have no-one of the Cassisi class. In fact when we smashed you in round 6 we dominated the clearances so much so that Mumbles Craig turned up at the post match press conference with “SOFT” clearly visible on his notepad. If there is one thing I am confident of it is that when the good teams put the soft Camry Crows under pressure in the finals your mob is gonna fold like a pack of cards.
As for your statement “Also, every AFL Premier has had these kind of players in the side. You don’t win flags without them”, Chipscab McLeod has two Norm’s and hasn’t got a hard ball since Moses wore shorts.
Carr didn't cost you a cent? He's playing for free then? Cost a spot on you list that could have been taken up by some young Revolutionary!
There were 3 decisions the club over the years made that I disagreed with and the Carey recruitment was one - he ended up being a drawcard basically, and if that got more members, then it was probably worth it. (One Sexy bloke back then, though!)
Because Choco did't play in 119, he was not responsible? WHAT?
Another feeble response after yet again being blown out of the water.
Do you ever look in the mirror and reflect on your life as a failure?
I only asked your opinion on something I wrote. I understand if it's too hard for you to comment on.
I only asked your opinion on something I wrote. I understand if it's too hard for you to comment on.
Why don’t you answer a few questions first?
If Tredrea made a “Nicolas Anelka” butterfly symbol as a post goal celebration would that make him a w***er?
If Petrenko made a “Thierry Henry” phone call as a post goal celebration would that make him a w***er?
PS. Diahatsu, you are not required to chirp in and if you do you will be duly ignored. Its best for you to stay with the coven and stir the cauldron, otherwise the anti-Port potion may be ruined.
I'll answer you question after you answer mine. After all, I did ask first.
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/hewitt-and-mcleod-in-court/2005/10/20/1129775882381.html
OK LeyLey did not whip out a handicam and film the areas that Chipscab took him to. There was an entire film crew that accompanied the two. What did Chipscab think was gonna happen?
Chipscab claims that he siad the video couldn’t be released to the public until the required consents of the Aboriginal authorities were obtained.
LeyLey says he was not aware of alleged permissions required from traditional landowners and the Northern Territory Land Council before film could be used.
According to LeyLey, Chipscab saw versions of the DVD at LeyLey's home at Christmas 2004 and in January 2005. Chipscab did not raise objections or inform LeyLey about required consents.
Chipscab also arranged for voice-overs for the DVD.
Chipscab sued his best-friend after the production of the DVD.
LeyLey counter-sued his best-friend.
This issue actually had a hearing in court before it was settled out-of-court.
Chipscab did not get an invite to LeyLey’s wedding.
You’re analogy using Motlop and Chad is not even close to what actually happened … but to answer your question, based on your highly flawed parallel, both Chad and Motlop would be w***ers.
Chipscab and LeyLey: w***ers extraordinaire.