Is there one thread this week that you haven't tainted with you s**t commentary?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is there one thread this week that you haven't tainted with you s**t commentary?
Oh the irony in that question....Is there one thread this week that you haven't tainted with you s**t commentary?
So posters and fans of "Big 4" teams, what's going on with all of the tantrums and meltdowns lately over the last 3 weeks?
View attachment 156322
View attachment 156323
I thought "Big 4" teams are supposed to be good and successful and supposed to be winning all the time and are powerful and marketable? Yet only 2 "Big 4" teams have succeeded in being brave this year while the other 2 are literally *******
Hahaha you bandwagoner!Calm as here, we'll be fine
when our caretaker coach's term expires.
Oh the irony in that question....
* off welching flog.you're a disgrace, mate.
But why is that demographic all melting lately? That lot have no right to melt as far as I'm concerned on that "measure", well maybe Richmond perhaps................Got a calculator.
Would be interested in how many combined flags the top 4 pretenders have won since your last flag.
Forget that the Top 4 was more just a supporter base measurement from another era... if flags are your measure of us, lets see what you have...
**** off welching flog.
OP is a flog.
I'm not very good at melting
But why is that demographic all melting lately? That lot have no right to melt as far as I'm concerned on that "measure", well maybe Richmond perhaps................
I tipped Collingwood crumbling 6 weeks ago and was accused of trolling. Sipping from the bottle of vindication wine tastes so suite ... I am #concerned about your Youf, Kennedy and De Goey look like Dekker Hine fizzers. Can't see Treloar wanting to join a team with such a bleak future.
You picked a team of 19-24 year olds to struggle against 1st, 2nd, 3rd and last year's prelim qualifier?
...and I thought we were brave.
you were beaten by a less experienced side today.You picked a team of 19-24 year olds to struggle against 1st, 2nd, 3rd and last year's prelim qualifier?
...and I thought we were brave.
I would not have commented if this fred wasn't made but that screenshot is #concerning evidence imo, it's not a dig at Collingwood, it's a dig at the demographic in general.You said we were supposed to be good, and powerful and marketable all the time.
So, present something other than a single H&A game to impart some relevance.
Of all the things you could hang your hat on after a good win for the dogs, you went money, supporters and flags vs the old Big 4?
Silly.
You were 4th at the time thoughYou picked a team of 19-24 year olds to struggle against 1st, 2nd, 3rd and last year's prelim qualifier?
...and I thought we were brave.
shawt is saving your embarrassing melt, mate.Don't de melt my melt Shawty
The Dogs had a younger team per average today then your lot, you can't play the age/inexperience card anymore.
you were beaten by a less experienced side today.
yes, the pies have some kids but it's still the experienced guys who are carrying you.
props to moore though, will be a player.
At least I can afford one how about yourself Mr compulsive gambler?...oh wait!Why don't you go take some more photos of some kids on your Nokia 1011?
pendles and swan 29 and 33 possies. wouldn't be pointing any fingers at them....That's the real fail of all these troll attempts. Pendles, untouchable for trolling apparently, again proved he might well be a bit of a Marc Murphy behind the wheel.
I don't want to tell you how to troll, but he is ripe for the picking