Remove this Banner Ad

Review Collingwood v Geelong review

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Sep 22, 2010
19,533
19,542
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Chicago Bulls
Snoop has some other committments so I'm covering for him with this weeks review.

Team notes:
1st quarter Hawkins and Podsiadly were getting it far too easily. Geelong getting clean entries into the forward 50 with Hawkins and Podsiadly marking far too easily on the lead. We had no 3rd man up or anyone filling the space allowing the two Geelong bigs to lead right up the middle which should not happen.

In the first half Geelong were rebounding far too easily from their back 50 and going end to end with little resistance. Did we overextend or not fully commit to the press in the 1st half?

With 15min to go in that final quarter we went completely into self preservation mode and just stopped our attack on the game. It was really hard to watch and in those situations you just need to continue to attack the game - we were playing not to lose which is very dangerous with so much time left to play. You always need to play to win. Ultimately very lucky the way things went in those final 2 minutes but we hardly won that final quarter through better play and our approach in these situations needs to change drastically because you don't win games like that against good teams with any regularity.


Votes:
5. Sidebottom
4. Pendlebury
3. Reid
2. Toovey
1. Jolly


Good:

Sidebottom: Played a great game. First 3 quarters in particular was absolutely outstanding. Just runs and runs and runs. Would love to see how many km he covered. Wouldn't be shocked if he covered 25km over the game such was the intensity of his running. Offensive running was great but also did plenty of defensive running and played great 2 way ball. I liked allot of his handballing in close, really stood out at times. His inside work was strong to go with his outside work, just looks like such a complete player now and I have him right in that same conversation with Pendles and Swan as our no.1 midfielder which is a credit to him. Marking game was good. Even showed his smarts on occasion creating space to allow him to execute which was great to see. Complete game and was the big reason why we were the better team over those first 3 quarters.

Pendlebury: Any 30 disposal, 4 goal effort from a midfielder is a serious effort. That final goal was luck more than skill in that final minute but I love the way he can lift his play when the game is on the line and at it's most important stages. You can just rely on him when needed and he just imposes his influence on the contest through his superiority. Just a dominant inside game. Kicking much improved this week after some weeks where his execution by foot was below average, even under pressure he executed some excellent kicks hitting his intended targets.

Reid: Had an absolutely aweful start. Those first 15 minutes on Hawkins was just dominated on the lead with Hawkins just getting free of him every time. After this he lifted his game significantly and had a serious impact in those final 3 quarters playing a big part in the final result. His confidence just kept growing and growing going from spoiling everything that came his way to winning 1 on 1s for the mark every time. Was just fantastic to watch him improve as the game went and to play such a big part in the win. Against Hawkins after quarter time physically held his own in every contest and won with their the spoil or mark which was fantastic. Also his tackling game was noteworthy, he had two very important tackles stopping what otherwise would have been certain Hawkins goals. Showed great technique and taking down such a big body is just so impressive. He came up big when he needed to and after quarter time did everything right.

Toovey: Was absolutely fantastic throughout. Stopped his direct opponent and offensively had a big influence. I can see big improvement in his ability to read the ball and he looks so confident going off his man and taking those intercept marks which he probably wouldn't have gone for last year. Provided some nice run and times and kicking was solid as always. Played a really complete game and will be one of the heros of the night who might have gone under the radar.

Jolly: To half time was our best on ground. His stats are hardly flattering but his influence on the contest was massive. Jolly had an incredible amount of meaningful taps to advantage in that first half. Such a difference having him in the team! He may not have snuck forward for goals and only took the one mark for the day, but his tap work was absolutely sensational and he was the reason our midfield got on top. Credit to the big fella. Having a sensational season and I like the way the club are managing him to make sure that he gets through the season.

Wellingham: Played a seriously good game and I consider him very unlucky not to have made my bests. Marking was absolutely excellent and he showed why he would make a really dangerous forward. What was good about the marking was just how strong he was overhead, even in instances where the opponent was spoiling the ball he still could hold strong for the mark which was impressive. I loved it in the forward pocket where he created space for himself with the ball to find Dale Thomas 30m out directly infront, was excellent play and great composure. Every time he got his hands on it he had an influence and made his posessions meaningful which is what really impressed me. Kicking execution was on for much of the night and at times excellent and his handballing in close also very good. Tackle numbers not super high but had some really meaningful tackles and an important stop near the end on the last line of defence which impressed me.

Swan: Went out in the final quarter and we really missed his run. Up to that point had played a really good game. Clearance work was nice. I loved the spin move to evade the tackle and open up the angle on goal up forward and to create space, just so smart up forward and kicks those goals so easily whenever he runs forward and attacks, maintaining that forward momentum.


Others:

Shaw: It is very intentional that I'm leaving him out of my bests. Kicking execution was absolutely terrible and well below standard. His poor kicking really hurt us and it was really unlike him to not execute with the consistency he typically does. Decision making was also poor and on an important kickout in the final quarter kicks short to Marty Clarke, but with more Geelong numbers on either side it was an easy ball to intercept. Shaw certainly got his share of the ball showing his typical rebounding proficiency with all those marks off opposition kicks as well as some strong 1v1 wins while also beating and shutting down his direct opponent. I liked his attack on the contest and on the ball and he really played hard and tried to put his stamp on the game. He is without a doubt in great form right now but none the less I expect better execution from someone of Shaw's quality. Particularly if he is going to be playing that loose man back role as he did tonight for much of the time.

Beams: Clearance work great as always. Just reads the ruck taps so well and puts himself in the best position every time which is what makes him such an effective inside player. I really like allot of his handballing in close, has great vision and finds the right target almost always. What I'd like to see Beamer clean up is with his clearance work he needs to show more composure when he wins it and instead of just going onto his boot and getting it forward to centre he needs to further use his vision and look for a target in close by hand because he so many times his rushed kicks forward get intercepted because they are more wish and hope kicks to get it out of his area rather than to a target which makes his kicking efficiency so low. Just needs to slow down a bit more in close, get that bit more comfortable and take lessons from Pendles to take those few more seconds to sum up his options before making those decisions inside. I think he can afford to change this aspect of his game because by hand it isn't just that he is precise, but also very quick at executing the handball so even if getting tackled he should still be able to execute without much problem. It just felt like such a re-occuring problem throughout the night that I couldn't not notice it every time he won the ball.

Cloke: Solid but probably not a great game. I loved that flying contested grab where he just went flying into the pack. He is still kicking with great confidence at goal and that aspect of his game seems to have really clicked for him this season which is great to see. Had a really good fight with Harry Taylor throughout the night and probably broke even from that contest. The one play on after a strong mark then kick out on the full was poor, but otherwise it was a reasonably solid without being a spectacular game. Don't know what it is this season but Cloke just doesn't seem as productive as he was last season. I suspect this might have to do with less big targets up forward with L.Brown gone and Dawes not producing to the level he has in seasons gone past. Hopefully things turn around for him in the 2nd half, he'd want it to being a contract year!

Dawes: Starting to work his way into the season now and performed better than in some of those early games. Competed well when put in the ruck but also up forward took some strong marks and in front of goal showed more confidence. He did have that very gettable miss, but when he thought the game was over early in the 4th with the big lead he loaded up from outside 50 and converted so with the less perceived pressure on his kick seemed allot better and on that occasion didn't seem to get inside his own head seemingly not expecting to kick it. Did like his game though and it was probably his first "productive" game for the season which is a real positive and a sign that his form is on the up.

Fasolo: I liked his unselfish kick from 50m out finding Wellingham closer to goal. After this though he played his usual selfish game where all he thought about was going for goal and being the hero. Other than playing his typical hero ball I didn't mind his game. His marking was on display and was really strong overhead. Conversion from set shots was good. Showed some evasiveness up forward and has that ability to create space for himself at times. His use of the handball was very good and can execute his handballs quickly to target. I loved the contest where he put his head over the ball and just charged at it v Stevey J, Stevey J ended up getting it to Geelong's advantage but I loved his attack on the ball and while he didn't win the ball I really enjoyed his endeavour. That 50m penalty was very fortunate in the end, I like that he converted it in the end. He is very much someone who can lift in the big moments and this just confirms that he is someone who enjoys that which is very pleasing to know that he is someone you can trust in end of game situations with the ball in hand, because those types can just make a habit of making winning plays and lifting in those critical moments as we have seen time and time again from Pendlebury, Thomas and Sidebottom.

Thomas: I don't think of Thomas as an outside running type anymore. He really looks like more of an inside player than he does outside now. His running this year doesn't look nearly as good as it was last year both from a speed and endurance standpoint - conditioning not nearly where I'd hope it would be for this time in the year. Hopefully this comes back as the year goes, but I'd really like to see him given more of an opportunity through the middle where this year he seems to best influence the contest. One other area for work, while it's nothing new, but his set shot goalkicking is still very ordinary and just needs more work. He works hard to impose himself on the game and his hardness goes without question. Perhaps an inside receiving role to capitalise off Beams' and Pendlebury's inside work might be the best role for him. What also impressed me was his handballing in close and like the rest of our midfield brigade just looks really good by hand and in close so add that to his natural tackling and his hardness and willingness to take those hits I like the inside role for him at the minute.

Goldsack: Another solid performance. Didn't get allot of the ball but when he did he made all his touches count. I loved that 65m set shot goal. Roccaesque. At times energised the team using his athleticism, I particularly liked his run after that Thomas handball over the top. Goldy was involved in another really notable play where he broke a tackle and kicking long finding Dawes placing the kick perfectly which was really encouraging with the feel of Goldsack's kicking often not quite right with him sometimes overkicking or just not placing it correctly. Did have his quiet patches and had one of two poor skill errors but there was allot more good than bad and Goldy looks to be on the improve which is encouraging.

Clarke: Didn't have his usual influence and was really quiet in the end I felt. Defensively got one of two important stops. Offensively I don't know whether Geelong shut down his influence or whether

Sinclair: Didn't have his usual defensive influence and hardly noticed him out there. His chasing and tackling just wasn't there to the usual standard. Had that one attempt where he nearly finished but couldn't quite convert in the end. A drop off from past games in intensity and needs to play to the intensity he did in those 7 and 8 tackle games from earlier on. That's what he is in the team for so if he can add that to some touches, solid ball use and maybe a goal a game he could make himself a fixture in the team, but I think there might be a couple knocking on the door in coming weeks.

Blair: Put his head over the ball every time and just went in hard as anything. At his size probably needs to play smarter football - as a low 170cm guy he won't physically have a huge influence and won't crunch guys so while I like his endeavour and attack on the footy he needs to play smarter to get his hands on it more and have a greater influence on the contest. He would be happy with that dribble goal from the angle.

O'Brien: Didn't provide the rebound he has in recent weeks but he wasn't the loose man. I liked allot of what he did throughout the night when he did get his hands on it though and he could probably have been better utilised on some occasions offensively. On one occasion he used Wellingham on a short pass centrally which was nice to see with our previous tendency to always look wide. I also liked one kick where he got bumped and still executed the short kick to Sidebottom. Defensively was ok and got some stops in on occasion but when he played on Podsiadly at times looked lost and on one occasion just completely misread the ball drop allowing an easy mark to Podsiadly early. Also lost that horrible 1v1 on Duncan where he got edged under the footy then losing his balance allowing Duncan to get goalside with the ball and convert for the easy goal. I'd rather he stick to a more offensive role either off a back flank or as an extra man down back if we elect to go the seven man backline because more often than not he does look lost on a man, often getting outbodied, outmarked, beaten on the lead or through not being able to change direction quick enough against more agile forwards. He just looks so much more comfortable running in a straight line and charging off a half back flank.

Maxwell: Had another strong game defensively. Took some intercept marks as well as some 1v1 marks. Imposed himself on the contest at times. Got some spoils in and on occasion played 3rd man up. I enjoyed one sequence where Maxy got the spoil and then followed up his effort with the tackle on Stevey J to stop what otherwise more than likely would have been a goal. Yet another solid game where the stat line doesn't flatter him, but he played his role and did what you expect from him.

Keeffe: Not his best game for the year. I think playing last week as a forward really unsettled him and he just seems to need that consistency of role which should be as a backman where he plays clearly his best footy. Tonight he just looked really unsettled, getting beaten on the lead early by both Podsiadly and Hawkins. Also his kicking while good for most of the night was on two or three pccasions off target which is very much unlike Lachie. He was due for a shocker, but considering the way he has started the season a very forgivable performance.

Didak: Didn't get allot of it and in the end got subbed. I still was encouraged by his performance and I see a place for him in our best side without a doubt. Ball use by foot was exceptional and back to the previous high standard we are used to. Just needs to find more of it and get utilised more offensively to increase his influence. Additionally defensively he needs to look to increase his influence, no tackles out of a forward/midfielder isn't good enough and to be of greatest use to this team he needs high possession counts while also accumulating some tackles each game.

Buckley: Got subbed on late. That handball that got intercepted by Geelong nearly gave me a heart attack. As with many of our mistakes in that final quarter the play could have and frankly should have resulted in a Geelong goal. Really wasn't a great handball and I just don't feel at all confident with Buckley in late game situations in close games or against better sides with his decision making and ball use issues.
 
I agree with your Best mate.

Though I would have Pendles ahead of Steele because of his 4 goals.

Reid started badly but really came into the Game once he found his Confidence was back. Real shame he got injured again:(
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
I agree with your Best mate.

Though I would have Pendles ahead of Steele because of his 4 goals.

Reid started badly but really came into the Game once he found his Confidence was back. Real shame he got injured again:(

It could go either way. Both were fantastic.

Hopefully Reid can make a speedy recovery but it looks clear that he needs more time out to strengthen up any issues so that he can play more than 1-2 games at a time.

Bit harsh on Reid's first 15 minutes. Could have put the best backman in AFL history on Hawkins and he wouldn't have been able to stop him with all the space he had. Delivery was spot on also.

Good review though.

I did have Reid as our 3rd best for the night. Keeffe had more early goals kicked on him than Reid, but considering Reid's high quality year last year my expectations of his performance are very high. Reid had one of his better games for the year and it's unbelieveable that he could play to that level even while playing hurt.

Yeah. That was a captain's performance from Pendles. I love Maxy, but the reigns should be handed over next year.

Sure was a captain's performance.

I'm not sure I agree with the perception that your best player needs to be captain though. Like with Tom Harley and Cameron Ling at Geelong, Maxwell similarly is just such an exceptional leader and captain and as good as Pendlebury is as a player and leader as in Geelong's case with Selwood for all those years I don't see it as something that needs to be changed. It will in no way improve his performance as a footballer and Pendlebury is still doing a great job leading by example without the title of captain.

But Pendlebury is without a doubt our next captain and would captain probably 15 of the other 17 clubs such is his quality.
 
i think the claim that jolly was bog at half time is absolutely ridiculous.

My mate and i were discussing it at half time and both thought jolly was getting his arse handed to him by a vfl level ruck.

i thought jolly lifted a little in the last quarter.....

i guess we all view it differently, we both thought he was cod ordinary you thought he was bog, bizarre.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
i think the claim that jolly was bog at half time is absolutely ridiculous.

My mate and i were discussing it at half time and both thought jolly was getting his arse handed to him by a vfl level ruck.

i thought jolly lifted a little in the last quarter.....

i guess we all view it differently, we both thought he was cod ordinary you thought he was bog, bizarre.

Depends on what sort of contribution you are looking for.

Jolly didn't go forward to take grabs or kick goals - which is one of the valueable things he can offer which he didn't last night.

But what he did do was win more ruck taps than he lost but more importantly he gave our midfielders first use and tapped it down their throats to positions where they could make meaningful advantage of his taps for clearances.
In my view Jolly was the big reason why our midfield got on top in the clearance battle in the first half in particular.
 
Thanks Knighta - appreciate the write up and largely agree....particularly with the top 5 but have some disagreements as thought these guys should have been listed as 'good';

Jolly - I thought he was pretty good. He was 1st game back for a few weeks and was up against two of them and thought he was ok. Was good around stoppages but probably let himself down around the ground. Notice he was running fwd for that late goal we got so good signs.

Wellingham - I know he didnt get huge stats but i thought his attack on the footy and run were awesome. I was really pleased with him.

Dawes - That wasnt a bad game at all. I thought he was good in the ruck and he certainly started to mark a few which was great. Certainly didnt think Lonergan had the better of him.

Shaw - Am with Knighta his first qtr was diabolical but gee the last qtr he was unreal. His intercept work was really good.

Goldsack - Knighta I thought he was very very good. Kept Mackie pretty subdued and hurt him the other way.

Fasolo - Knighta another i disagree on. Kicked 3 from HF - happy with that 26 games a season! I thought he was good and I thought he attacked the footy as well.
 
Lovely write up, thanks. I agree that Shaw let himself down with his disposal. I'd have Pendles as BOG. It's the 4 goals and 12 touches in the last when we were under the pump.

Cheers, J
 
Pendles 4 goals wins us the game - he was BOG i thought

Lovely write up, thanks. I agree that Shaw let himself down with his disposal. I'd have Pendles as BOG. It's the 4 goals and 12 touches in the last when we were under the pump.

Cheers, J

Thanks for the kind words.

Very hard to go against Pendles for B.O.G. He deserves as much credit for the win as anyone. You just have to love the way he lifted his game in those critical late moments. That's what you want to see from your best players and Pendlebury time and time again produces.

I was just so taken by Sidey's first 3 quarters that I couldn't not list him as our best, but both were phenominal.

Thanks Knighta - appreciate the write up and largely agree....particularly with the top 5 but have some disagreements as thought these guys should have been listed as 'good';

Jolly - I thought he was pretty good. He was 1st game back for a few weeks and was up against two of them and thought he was ok. Was good around stoppages but probably let himself down around the ground. Notice he was running fwd for that late goal we got so good signs.

Wellingham - I know he didnt get huge stats but i thought his attack on the footy and run were awesome. I was really pleased with him.

Dawes - That wasnt a bad game at all. I thought he was good in the ruck and he certainly started to mark a few which was great. Certainly didnt think Lonergan had the better of him.

Shaw - Am with Knighta his first qtr was diabolical but gee the last qtr he was unreal. His intercept work was really good.

Goldsack - Knighta I thought he was very very good. Kept Mackie pretty subdued and hurt him the other way.

Fasolo - Knighta another i disagree on. Kicked 3 from HF - happy with that 26 games a season! I thought he was good and I thought he attacked the footy as well.

I should re-phrase "good" as "bests". Essentially I only list who I thought were our best 6-8 for the night.

But I agree Goldy and Fas by their standards had strong games. Which against a quality side like Geelong is a great sign! Both his the scoreboard and did some positive things.

I saw Wellingham's game in the same way you did. Didn't have Swan like numbers but he had a very, very good game. Just made things happen every time he got his hands on it.
 
Nothing Reid could have done in the first 15mins, Hawkins had an open 50m because the ball swung out from kick-ins and he just got simple lead up chest marks.
When the game was played normally Reid out positioned him and pretty much owned him after that.
 
Great review but I disagree with your assessment of O'Brien's game, which I think was very poor in most aspects. He seems confused and unless he is played as an attacking player only, he gets lost in between trying to close down a man and trying to run off.

I find that when he is in a 1 on 1 situation, he is already thinking about what he's going to do once he gets the ball before he even gets it. He needs to commit himself to killing the contest, even if it means going with the conservative option; spoiling. He very rarely attempts the punch which means that when the ball comes in overhead and he isn't in the perfect position, he often overestimates his ability to get into a marking position and he leaves himself prone to losing the contest. He needs to learn to be more dour when he is one on one and the ball is coming in to our defensive 50.

Last night his positioning as a defenders was about as bad as I've seen it but Geelong just didn't capitalise as well as come other teams have. He had a very poor game. Around 2007 and 2008 when he was more of a defensive player he was getting to the point where he was just about the best one on one defender on smalls in the competition. That was why the Jimmy Clement comparisons started coming in. As he began to realise that he had the capacity to be a really expansive running backman, his defensive game has degenerated to the point where he generally looks completely lost and incompetent in aerial contested situations. He needs to be told that he is a running backman/loose man only or he is a medium defender only. Some players can do both but I don't think he is one of them. If the coaches can't get the mix right, I honestly think some time in the VFL would be a good idea with Harry. He needs to know that the direction he is going is not good for his personal performances and leaves the team susceptible to being scored against.

I have noticed that Maxwell's ability as a one on one defender is improving almost by the week these days. He is a great puncher who plays within his limitations and he is getting to the point where he is rarely beaten one on one anymore. I used to worry when Maxwell was playing on a man but he times his punches brilliantly now. I think he is extremely reliable defensively these days.

I thought Didak was great considering the time he came out. Some of his kicking to position was simply sublime. He needs to be told that he can't stand as wide of his man as he does though. There were at least three times last night where he was 20-30 metres from his man and he was oblivious to it. Every time a Geelong player had the ball and didn't look up enough before moving the ball on. He would have been caught cold otherwise. The signs are great with Didak though and I think in 6-8 weeks time he will be in great form
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Great review but I disagree with your assessment of O'Brien's game, which I think was very poor in most aspects. He seems confused and unless he is played as an attacking player only, he gets lost in between trying to close down a man and trying to run off.

I find that when he is in a 1 on 1 situation, he is already thinking about what he's going to do once he gets the ball before he even gets it. He needs to commit himself to killing the contest, even if it means going with the conservative option; spoiling. He very rarely attempts the punch which means that when the ball comes in overhead and he isn't in the perfect position, he often overestimates his ability to get into a marking position and he leaves himself prone to losing the contest. He needs to learn to be more dour when he is one on one and the ball is coming in to our defensive 50.

Last night his positioning as a defenders was about as bad as I've seen it but Geelong just didn't capitalise as well as come other teams have. He had a very poor game. Around 2007 and 2008 when he was more of a defensive player he was getting to the point where he was just about the best one on one defender on smalls in the competition. That was why the Jimmy Clement comparisons started coming in. As he began to realise that he had the capacity to be a really expansive running backman, his defensive game has degenerated to the point where he generally looks completely lost and incompetent in aerial contested situations. He needs to be told that he is a running backman/loose man only or he is a medium defender only. Some players can do both but I don't think he is one of them. If the coaches can't get the mix right, I honestly think some time in the VFL would be a good idea with Harry. He needs to know that the direction he is going is not good for his personal performances and leaves the team susceptible to being scored against.

I have noticed that Maxwell's ability as a one on one defender is improving almost by the week these days. He is a great puncher who plays within his limitations and he is getting to the point where he is rarely beaten one on one anymore. I used to worry when Maxwell was playing on a man but he times his punches brilliantly now. I think he is extremely reliable defensively these days.

I thought Didak was great considering the time he came out. Some of his kicking to position was simply sublime. He needs to be told that he can't stand as wide of his man as he does though. There were at least three times last night where he was 20-30 metres from his man and he was oblivious to it. Every time a Geelong player had the ball and didn't look up enough before moving the ball on. He would have been caught cold otherwise. The signs are great with Didak though and I think in 6-8 weeks time he will be in great form

I don't disagree with your thoughts on O'Brien. All season I have very much been in the O'Brien to play an offensive role camp. I very strongly agree that he looks lost defensively, not just this week but every week for the past 2 seasons.

Interesting observation about Harry's defensive game getting worse, and you are right. In my view defensively he is even worse at ground level again and struggles most against those really quick, evasive forwards who are good at ground level even more than those who are strong in the air. If he is to play a defensive role at any stage I like it most when he plays in a physical, in your face manor as he did early career in roles on the likes of Stevey J.
It will be interesting to see what we have in mind with him. VFL is an interesting idea. With the lack of depth at present I probably wouldn't, but if we get more players healthy I wouldn't be opposed to the idea.

Interesting observation about Maxwell. Have mostly noticed him playing 3rd man and getting those intercept marks in recent weeks. Will look out for his 1v1 game over coming weeks.

With your observation on Didak I take it you were at the game? Interesting that he is playing so wide. Sounds like he is still used to the wide Malthouse ball. I wonder if he was part of the reason why the press broke down in that 1st half and Geelong could go end to end so easily?
 
Ths Rusler's assessment of O.B is probably accurate. O'B used to inspire confidence in his ability to handle small guys, but he is as others have agreed really struggling and needs to recapture some form this week. Hasn't he played on Porplizya in the past and held him or am I dreaming?
 
Im really liking goldsack at the moment, he seems to finally have confidence in himself and his ability and is playing within his limits. The only bad parts to his game at the moment is he needs to find 5 more possesions per game, and he often has butter fingers and drops marks he should take. Apart from that im finally confident he has cemented his spot after 6 years of trying, well done goldy !
 
Harry's form may be a product of our revolving door back line. It seems like he trying to cover space and getting caught out. He needs to put some faith in his defenders and keep his opponant as his priority.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Good summary.

Re the last quarter, the players deserve a fair bit of credit. With didak subbed out and with swan and Reid's injuries, we would have had only one rotation on the bench. Given the cats came at us hard in that last quarter, it was a super gutsy win.
 
VFL is an interesting idea. With the lack of depth at present I probably wouldn't, but if we get more players healthy I wouldn't be opposed to the idea.

Interesting observation about Maxwell. Have mostly noticed him playing 3rd man and getting those intercept marks in recent weeks. Will look out for his 1v1 game over coming weeks.

With your observation on Didak I take it you were at the game? Interesting that he is playing so wide. Sounds like he is still used to the wide Malthouse ball. I wonder if he was part of the reason why the press broke down in that 1st half and Geelong could go end to end so easily?

I agree that the lack of depth due to injuries is the only thing saving him right now. It would be great to have another defensively sound medium back so that the coaches don't have a dilemma and we can use O'Brien primarily where his strengths lie. I think moving Goldsack and Shaw permanently back would be a poor move as well. Goldsack has found his niche and Shaw is playing great football. He was a bit fumbly on Friday but his few games before that were dynamite.

I was at the game. I don't know if he is oblivious to where his opponent is or if he just doesn't care. I suspect it's the former because he's so ball conscious. It tends to happen when he is ball side of his opponent on our defensive forward flank when an opposition player has the ball in the middle of the ground. He just doesn't look to see his opponent getting further and further away from him until they are in acres of space. I don't think this is why the press broke down a tad on the weekend though because I didn't see Geelong take advantage of it at any point. You can guarantee that other clubs had opposition scouts there though who would be licking their lips. Our people would have noticed it though and it shouldn't be overly hard to rectify I wouldn't have thought.
 
Thanks very much for the review, just a couple of quick observations.
I think this was a real break through game for Fas, we know he has truckloads of skill, i just thought his competitiveness and presence against quality was very impressive. I htink he has set a bench mark for himself.

Re Didak, I really didnt know how to rate his game, but i felt he was the right player to sub out. Some of his kicking was very sharp, just the lack of pressure and physicality was very noticeable. Not sure if all of Dids, Sinclair, Fas, Blair and Wellingham can be in the 22, certainly not the best 26 even. Fas, Wellingham are locks of course. The current injuries mean they all play for now..
As was noted, Dids was constantly 5 to 10 meters away from the action, lurking...not sure about that.

Lastly, Keeffe and Goldsack present an interesting future. They would have to be massive targets for the new clubs, they could double or triple their salaries and be very very valuable players...we need to be on alert not just for big guns liek Cloke and Reid!!
 
Im really liking goldsack at the moment, he seems to finally have confidence in himself and his ability and is playing within his limits. The only bad parts to his game at the moment is he needs to find 5 more possesions per game, and he often has butter fingers and drops marks he should take. Apart from that im finally confident he has cemented his spot after 6 years of trying, well done goldy !

Goldy just needs to feel secure in our best 22. Once he does you just see him play with great confidence and have a much greater impact. Over the past 2 weeks it has been a pleasure to watch Goldy playing some really good footy.

He will always made some mistakes in every game, dropping some gettable marks, have a couple of shocking kicks which completely miss the intended targets or whatever might be the case on the night. You just have to take the good with the bad, but some of the good can be flat out brilliant and we are seeing more hints of this as his confidence is building which is fun to watch.

I wouldn't bet on him being best 22 next year with a completely healthy list, but certainly this year with our horrible injury situation his position is very secure.

Good summary.

Re the last quarter, the players deserve a fair bit of credit. With didak subbed out and with swan and Reid's injuries, we would have had only one rotation on the bench. Given the cats came at us hard in that last quarter, it was a super gutsy win.

Those first few minutes of the final quarter certainly were very good.

But on the whole I saw allot of really conservative football throughout that final quarter and it was just allot of holding onto the footy and hoping Geelong would fall to sleep. I probably saw it differently in that I saw Geelong as unlucky not to pile on 10 goals - just their execution let them down in the end. We were just playing so passive, turning the ball over then Geelong would continually fail to execute which is really surprising because Geelong typically are excellent closers.

Those finals 2 minutes were a combination of luck and the will of some incredible individuals who lifted when required.

I agree though it is a sensational effort to win in a game where we lost Swan and to have Reid fighting through injury and still producing was really great to watch.

Thanks very much for the review, just a couple of quick observations.
I think this was a real break through game for Fas, we know he has truckloads of skill, i just thought his competitiveness and presence against quality was very impressive. I htink he has set a bench mark for himself.

Re Didak, I really didnt know how to rate his game, but i felt he was the right player to sub out. Some of his kicking was very sharp, just the lack of pressure and physicality was very noticeable. Not sure if all of Dids, Sinclair, Fas, Blair and Wellingham can be in the 22, certainly not the best 26 even. Fas, Wellingham are locks of course. The current injuries mean they all play for now..
As was noted, Dids was constantly 5 to 10 meters away from the action, lurking...not sure about that.

Lastly, Keeffe and Goldsack present an interesting future. They would have to be massive targets for the new clubs, they could double or triple their salaries and be very very valuable players...we need to be on alert not just for big guns liek Cloke and Reid!!

Fas was very good. Certainly the best I've seen of him this year after a slow start. Just has to build on this performance. I can imagine he will take a fair amount of confidence out of it so lets hope he continues his progress and shows further development in coming weeks.

I agree with your summary of Didak's game. Footskills are spot on this year after an indifferent year by foot last year. Just needs to step up his intensity, run harder, lay more tackles and lift his production. Hopefully with more games he should continue to show more improvement. I'm certainly in favour of giving him another month of senior footy.

All those forwards you mentioned have the ability to play through the midfield so I don't have a huge issue with all playing in the same team assuming they are in our best side on that given week. It will be interesting to see how we balance our forwardline from here on in though. Add Goldy into that equation and it becomes quite a full forwardline. With more players healthy a few of the forwards will likely get squeezed out, but for the time being it's just a case of mix and match.

Keeffe I am absolutely in favour of keeping and matching any offer. He has been our best defender all year and I'd have him top 5 in the Copeland based on what he has produced up to this point in the season which is a real credit to him considering how far back he has come from. With N.Brown rarely healthy and Tarrant nearing the end I see the Keeffe + Reid combination as our backline for the next 10 years and two of the very high priority must retains.

Goldsack on the other hand I wouldn't be opposed to entertaining offers for. I don't have him inside our best 22 for next year assuming we have a fully healthy list and I honestly think he could be better utilised in a full time role for another club. So if the price is right I would move him because his value assuming he continues his good form is as high as I ever see it getting for a player just outside of our true best 22.
Geelong could do worse than target Goldy since they really lack a player in that age group. He could very quickly find a role either forward or back and his pace would be welcome in their mostly slow side.
 
Spent a few days sulking but i thought i should say well done on your win.

When the score was tied late in the last quarter i thought to myself, wow this would be a robbery to win this, and as it turned out it didnt happen and the best team won.

Its hard to wish you good luck for the season but if you play the Hawks in the GF i think ill lean towards you blokes.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Review Collingwood v Geelong review

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top