Just some random thoughts about the crowd on Sunday (which forever shall be known as Glorious Sunday
):
Attendance
What’s the record for a Showdown - 47-48,000? at 44,800 it was about 3,000 down on what I would have thought was a “great” crowd, but given the factors (below) it wasn’t too bad.
1. Weather - yes, it was fine, but the morning was threatening and a lot of people don’t seem to look beyond what the sky looks like at 10am - they don’t look at the forecast, they don’t see the relatively high cloud and realise the (light) rain is likely to clear. Personally I think that’s dumb, but people do it.
2. A lot of people would have expected the Crows to lose. Again, I don’t accept that attitude but it is a fact of life.
So all things considered, the crowd was about 3,000 below where it should have been, but not a terrible result.
Numbers rating: 9/10, allowing for weather and result expectations.
Noise
Very good. OK, we were winning, and winning well, so let’s not hang too much on that. But the crowd was very good, especially as evidenced by the spontaneous roar(s) during the 3Q time break.
Still the same old “Adder-layde, clap-clap-clap” but then again, we’re not the only crowd in the comp that can’t improve on that. Even the much vaunted Port crowd basically relies on “Pow-er, clap-clap-clap”.
My personal favourite, Mr Negative who sites behind me, had only a few opportunities to complain about the players’ mistakes. Other than that, he was pretty much silent
Cheersquad contribution: barely heard them. Port cheersquad was at least as good, and they were losing.
Noise rating: 8/10 but nothing to get excited about given the situation. Bonus point for booing Rucci
):Attendance
What’s the record for a Showdown - 47-48,000? at 44,800 it was about 3,000 down on what I would have thought was a “great” crowd, but given the factors (below) it wasn’t too bad.
1. Weather - yes, it was fine, but the morning was threatening and a lot of people don’t seem to look beyond what the sky looks like at 10am - they don’t look at the forecast, they don’t see the relatively high cloud and realise the (light) rain is likely to clear. Personally I think that’s dumb, but people do it.
2. A lot of people would have expected the Crows to lose. Again, I don’t accept that attitude but it is a fact of life.
So all things considered, the crowd was about 3,000 below where it should have been, but not a terrible result.
Numbers rating: 9/10, allowing for weather and result expectations.
Noise
Very good. OK, we were winning, and winning well, so let’s not hang too much on that. But the crowd was very good, especially as evidenced by the spontaneous roar(s) during the 3Q time break.
Still the same old “Adder-layde, clap-clap-clap” but then again, we’re not the only crowd in the comp that can’t improve on that. Even the much vaunted Port crowd basically relies on “Pow-er, clap-clap-clap”.
My personal favourite, Mr Negative who sites behind me, had only a few opportunities to complain about the players’ mistakes. Other than that, he was pretty much silent

Cheersquad contribution: barely heard them. Port cheersquad was at least as good, and they were losing.
Noise rating: 8/10 but nothing to get excited about given the situation. Bonus point for booing Rucci









