Player Watch Darcy Fogarty

How many goals will Darcy Fogarty kick in 2023?


  • Total voters
    129
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

I think we can safely say our future forward trio will not be those three.

It's looking very likely that Fog won't make it as a player (and really, we're at the point we really should be considering putting a line through him if we drop him again), and Cook is likely to end up a winger who can float forward.

At the moment, our trio is likely Thilthrope/???/Gollant. I'm hopeful on McAsey making the jump as a 2nd forward, as having another contested marking option certainly frees up Thilthorpe to play as a classical CHF, seeing the kid has a monster tank on him. Gollant certainly has it in him to end up a pretty special third tall as well.
You’ve got to be kidding, we’ve just re-signed him.
 
He played in his fifth premiership 30 years ago. Only 4 players on our list had been born at that point in time, he's closer to Melbourne's last premiership than he is to today. A CHF who was shorter than Tom Doedee, and near enough the same height and weight as Ben Keays. The game is barely recognisable.
Dermie was famous for his massive work rate... which is the complete opposite of Fogarty.

Dermie just hasn't seen enough of Fogarty to realise his shortcomings. Dunstall has watched/commentated a lot of our games, and did the review 18 months ago. Dunstall is much more familiar with Fogarty's issues. That's why Dermie is asking Roo why he's not an automatic selection, while Dunstall is saying "2 goals is nice, but is it enough to compensate for everything else - probably not".
 
You’ve got to be kidding, we’ve just re-signed him.
It's difficult to "put a line through him" when neither of the alternatives are any better. Fog/Billy/Berg - pick your poison. It's like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Getting some class into our midfield has to be priority #1, but finding a decent KPF to support TT going forward has to be close behind.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

It's difficult to "put a line through him" when neither of the alternatives are any better. Fog/Billy/Berg - pick your poison. It's like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Getting some class into our midfield has to be priority #1, but finding a decent KPF to support TT going forward has to be close behind.
Fogarty will be a very suitable option going forward once we stop delivering them s**t sandwiches.
 
Fogarty will be a very suitable option going forward once we stop delivering them sh*t sandwiches.
Only if he loses weight, massively improves his fitness, and turns his lazy attitude around. The midfield issues aren't helping, but most of Fogarty's problems are 100% Fogarty.
 
That’s not 100%
Depends on whether you're talking about our forward line as a whole, or just Fogarty.

If Fogarty doesn't lift his game, then it won't matter how much our midfield improves. However, the improved midfield could result in greater output through improvements elsewhere in our forward line.
 
Depends on whether you're talking about our forward line as a whole, or just Fogarty.

If Fogarty doesn't lift his game, then it won't matter how much our midfield improves. However, the improved midfield could result in greater output through improvements elsewhere in our forward line.
There will be an improvement throughout the forward line including Fogarty
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I think our midget brigade up forward are more of a concern that Fog. Not only do they the goals, but Rowe and Murphy have been barely providing any pressure. Fog is contributing far more than these two plus or Mchenry.

On SM-A205YN using BigFooty.com mobile app
Hard to agree with anything linked to Mr Burton but maybe the name is in jest .
But agree it is hard to fathom the amount of flack that Fogarty gets on this site yet we have the midget brigade almost get off scot free as they all Murphy , Rowe and McHenry offer no entry contest, no goal scoring or assistance and pressure presence .
I personally thought last game from Fog was good as seemed to be prepared to lead more and some good ground ball work .
Yes he didn't do much in 2nd half but who did and who would the way the ball come in and when did opposition defenders doubled up on Tex ,fog and laser extent Himmelberg with the bombs coming in.
Thats why absolute must for Sloane to play virtually permanent forward as he will assist in all areas .
 
It's difficult to "put a line through him" when neither of the alternatives are any better. Fog/Billy/Berg - pick your poison. It's like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Getting some class into our midfield has to be priority #1, but finding a decent KPF to support TT going forward has to be close behind.
[/QUOT
Dermie was famous for his massive work rate... which is the complete opposite of Fogarty.

Dermie just hasn't seen enough of Fogarty to realise his shortcomings. Dunstall has watched/commentated a lot of our games, and did the review 18 months ago. Dunstall is much more familiar with Fogarty's issues. That's why Dermie is asking Roo why he's not an automatic selection, while Dunstall is saying "2 goals is nice, but is it enough to compensate for everything else - probably not".
A key point here is Dunstall is a friend of Roo.
 
If you're a defender, would you rather be playing on Murphy, Rowe, McHenry, McAdam, Himmelberg, Frampton, Mcasey or Fogarty?

Sure you might get a few easy marks, Fogarty also does something not one of those others can, impose himself physically on the game. Makes the defenders second guess themselves, and actually flies the flag for our club (McHenry does it too, but it's a bit of a joke when he's probably the smallest player in the afl, can't doubt his heart though). You can't underrate what that kind of aggression can bring, especially in big time games. He's made for prelims and grand finals, you don't slot goals from 50m on the boundary that calm and collected if you're not made for the big time.
 
If you're a defender, would you rather be playing on Murphy, Rowe, McHenry, McAdam, Himmelberg, Frampton, Mcasey or Fogarty?

Sure you might get a few easy marks, Fogarty also does something not one of those others can, impose himself physically on the game. Makes the defenders second guess themselves, and actually flies the flag for our club (McHenry does it too, but it's a bit of a joke when he's probably the smallest player in the afl, can't doubt his heart though). You can't underrate what that kind of aggression can bring, especially in big time games. He's made for prelims and grand finals, you don't slot goals from 50m on the boundary that calm and collected if you're not made for the big time.
I think you need to bring it back to 40 m out dead in front,and they will struggle
 
people’s make up are different, I can work twice as hard as the next bloke but still not reach his level, aerobicly
yes, but that doesn't mean you couldn't get to AFL level ability.

maybe not elite, but if Stuart Dew can do it, Darcy Fogarty can do it.
 
I wonder how many of these posts would have existed this week if Fog hadn’t been consistently burned when he’d found space. Both of Keays goals saw Fog having made space If Keays had passed off instead of taking much lower (but ultimately successful) percentage shots, he would have, more than likely, had 4 goals. Some here would have lauded him for a breakout game. Even Vader mifht have been satisfied for a week.
 
If you're a defender, would you rather be playing on Murphy, Rowe, McHenry, McAdam, Himmelberg, Frampton, Mcasey or Fogarty?

Sure you might get a few easy marks, Fogarty also does something not one of those others can, impose himself physically on the game. Makes the defenders second guess themselves, and actually flies the flag for our club (McHenry does it too, but it's a bit of a joke when he's probably the smallest player in the afl, can't doubt his heart though). You can't underrate what that kind of aggression can bring, especially in big time games. He's made for prelims and grand finals, you don't slot goals from 50m on the boundary that calm and collected if you're not made for the big time.
As a tall defender, you'd take Fogarty every day of the week. You know he's lazy, so you can take intercept marks and run off him all day - resulting in your own team scoring far more goals than Fogarty creates with his handful of touches.
 
I wonder how many of these posts would have existed this week if Fog hadn’t been consistently burned when he’d found space. Both of Keays goals saw Fog having made space If Keays had passed off instead of taking much lower (but ultimately successful) percentage shots, he would have, more than likely, had 4 goals. Some here would have lauded him for a breakout game. Even Vader mifht have been satisfied for a week.
watching the last match he doesn't get hit up as often as you would like.

but the flip side of that is that he only leads 1 or 2 times and gives up. (from what I saw)
 
As a tall defender, you'd take Fogarty every day of the week. You know he's lazy, so you can take intercept marks and run off him all day - resulting in your own team scoring far more goals than Fogarty creates with his handful of touches.
As opposed to billy not even scoring goals?
You’d take Frampton every day of the week, in fact you wouldn’t even bother lining up on him.
 
Back
Top