LanceRomance
Brownlow Medallist
The lawyers are being suited up as we speak.
just because lawyers are being suited up doesn't mean that there will be a glorious victory in the courtroom
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
The lawyers are being suited up as we speak.
Isnt it so predictable to see Bomber fans making light of Dean Robinsons health problems, yet they cry like babies as soon as someone calls David Evans a hypochondriac
This is why we cant wait to see you Bomber morons fall into a state of severe depression when Hird is gone and your club is finished.
its going to be so sweet.
The lawyers are being suited up as we speak.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Also someone who will never work in their field again.
all have the option to black-opt out.
can someone explain this black ops thing to me?
I don't know who to believe but I am highly suspicious of the exotic supplement program that went on at Essendon last year.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/vi...ms-on-drugs-saga/story-fni0fit3-1226688312161can someone explain this black ops thing to me?
AMES Hird faces fresh allegations over the drugs saga, this time that he agreed the 2012 supplements program was to be a "black ops'' operation.
Don't ask James Hird to explain it- a bit like Pauline Hanson and xenophobia. "Please explain."can someone explain this black ops thing to me?
What, before he resigned?The same testimony would've gone to ASADA when the Weapon was interviewed.
I have always thought it strange to expect much from the Weapon.
If he admits to Essendon using banned peptides he is incriminating himself as an official in a role that had the responsibility of overseeing their strength and conditioning.
That in itself could lead to infractions form ASADA.
My guess is he will say he thought it was all above board and Hird knew all about it. They were then misled by Dank and to a certain extent ASADA (no mention of S0) and so continued on with their program thinking all was ok. Its not until much later they worked out that AOD was S0.
So in their eyes they were not culpable.
But Hird knew all about the program and endorsed it.
Somehow he was made the scapegoat in all of this and copped a club suspension unfairly.
Something along those lines.........
You've got it all wrong, the incentive is to focus on as a little dirt as possible. The important motivation here isn't with The Weapon, it's with Channel 7. If Essendon get shafted, then the AFL product next year, or even this year during the finals, is devalued, that means lower ratings and less revenue. It's in Channel 7's interest to make this go away. Hence the hard hitting journalist that is Luke Darcy.As always, ask yourself what his motive is.
He wont help himself for another gig, so this is basically for the cash.
Means the incentive is to focus on as much dirt as possible, because C7 would not have agreed to $100k without knowing what they are getting.
You do realize he's making that up. Don't you?
Run along, it was a reciprocal take down. You've got yourself all flustered.Haha. Another round of 'believe everything he says, except the parts I don't like.' Of course he could be lying, but you don't know that.
So when he says nice things about Jobe, will that be a lie too?
Same thing happened when Dank did his interview. Essendon fans I spoke to believed him when he said he didn't use PEDs on players, but called him a liar when he said the coaches did. And their excuse when I talked to them? 'Dank is untrustworthy.' When challenged that if he is untrustworthy, how can you believe him about the part you want to believe, I received blank stares. It was literally impossible to highlight to these people that if they thought he was untrustworthy, they couldn't believe anything he says.
Now I predict we will see threads full of 'black ops' references in an attempt to discredit Robinson because it sounds absurd. They will conveniently forget that the context is severely lacking based on that snippet, and he is referring to Dank's words in reference to something put to him, not his.
Sounds a bit too convenient to me personally. But at this point we only have public statements from Dank and Robinson, Hird hasn't even denied their allegations.
A common myth is that Hird has publically denied using Hexarelin, for example, which is untrue. All he said was that Dank's allegations were 'horrifying' and an attempt to 'ruin his reputation.'
So without even hearing Hird's side of the story, people are calling them liars? Surely we at least have to hear his version of events before we say that?
Can't wait for the Dank corroboration of The Weapon re Black Ops- that will be hilarious.windy hill had a thing to learn about risk management and black ops. a 36 player playing list too unwieldy when there is always a bubble that is transient and looking for other options.
The lawyers are being suited up as we speak.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/vi...ms-on-drugs-saga/story-fni0fit3-1226688312161
James Hird denies fresh claims on drugs saga
Isn't it hilarious that the three conditions apparently imposed on the program by Hird haven't been adhered to yet they bring this up as their defenseThe Bombers hit back at the claims tonight, saying: "As has previously been stated, James Hird emphasised that the supplements program run by Stephen Dank and Dean Robinson must be legal according to WADA and the AFL, must be approved by the club doctor, must be given with the consent of the player and must not harm the player,'' the Bombers said.