Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
lenny&carl said:Because I know that all real footy fans love Didak
![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Effes said:Just on SEN
jimmy_clement#8 said:Seriosly, I'm not even sure the report looks like it could be cleared, all we could speculate on was trying to get it to look like a one or two week report, let alone cleared. If Dids is cleared, I'm doing a nude run down my street.
scary thing is i think you and others actually believe that.jj1978 said:Lets see,
Channel 9, telecasting the game..... Eddie Mcguire runs channel 9 and Collingwood.
Tapes get edited thanks to highly skilled channel 9 film editors and the magic of computers.
I wonder??? something to think about.
This is from official AFL press release.davidmuir21 said:The match day report laid against Collingwood's Alan Didak was reviewed. It was the view of the Match Review Panel that Scotland took possession of the ball and Didak began to moved towards him from the side and slightly behind the Carlton player. Scotland first realised his opponent was approaching when he was approximately two metres away. Didak had positioned himself to bump and had his arm and shoulder tucked in for contact. Scotland attempted to avoid contact but unfortunately contact was made to his head. Despite the high contact, Didak's action was viewed as a legitimate attempt to bump. Therefore, the contact to the head was considered accidental and the action was not considered to be a reportable offence.
Really? Might want to review all the bumps that were similar and cleared throughout the year, heres a hint, none were Collingwood playersCorrosion said:If that was a non Collingwood player, it would've been 2 weeks easy.
It hit him high did it not? Probably didn't hit him high deliberately but surely his bump was at least negligent if not reckless to cause Scotland to be ko'd.Zeke said:It was a legal bump.
No case to answer.
davidmuir21 said:The match day report laid against Collingwood's Alan Didak was reviewed. It was the view of the Match Review Panel that Scotland took possession of the ball and Didak began to moved towards him from the side and slightly behind the Carlton player. Scotland first realised his opponent was approaching when he was approximately two metres away. Didak had positioned himself to bump and had his arm and shoulder tucked in for contact. Scotland attempted to avoid contact but unfortunately contact was made to his head. Despite the high contact, Didak's action was viewed as a legitimate attempt to bump. Therefore, the contact to the head was considered accidental and the action was not considered to be a reportable offence.
It might be late before he does his run - Mick has got them training tonight.RustyG said:Geez,I hope its not cold tonight.![]()
![]()
davidmuir21 said:Scotland attempted to avoid contact but unfortunately contact was made to his head.
Going further than RichmondGrechy said:Doesn't matter. Give them their best 22, they're still crap and going nowhere this year.
Grechy said:Doesn't matter. Give them their best 22, they're still crap and going nowhere this year.
Rashes#2 said:flipping Tribunal absolute Wa@#$rs!!!! Mark johnson gets a reprimand for nothing and didak gets cleared for nearly killing a bloke!!! i wonder how much eddy payed them??? shame he cant buy u a premiership!!!!
The Old Dark Navy's said:So accidental head high contact is not grounds for suspension? Tell that to players rubbed out for attempting a spoil and getting the head. And while you are at it, give Chris Grant back his ****ing Brownlow.