dude, he's kicked like 2 more goals than Windsor who doesn't even play in the forward line. And good luck comparing Watson to the real Wizard who kicked 9 goals in a half, took marks of the century contenders, goal of the years and almost 500 goals over a long career.
Correct, he didn't give himself the nickname. But people shouldn't be calling him that. It's disrespectful to an all time great. Or do we start calling Grainger-barass the 'G-train' while we're at it?
The point is that you are trying to compare the first year of a kid's career to the best performances of a 240 game player.
Farmer was a star over a long period of time, but at the start of his career he was no better than Watson.
Can Watson reach those heights over his whole career? Maybe. He is only 11 games into it ffs.
You want to make comparisons between Watson and Windsor?
Sure, Watson only has 2 more goals than Windsor, but he's also played 7 less games. In fact, Watson averages twice as many goals per game.
Pretty poor of Windsor as a midfielder to only average 4 more disposals per game than a small forward in Watson.
Windsor averages 2 more clangers per game than Watson as well, so I guess we can make that only two 'useful' disposals per game more than Watson.
Watson averages the same amount of tackles and marks per game, which are much harder to come across in the forward line as well.
At the end of the day, Windsor looks like he'll be a solid 200 game player.
But if you gave the 18 clubs the option of taking Windsor or Watson, I can guarantee that almost all of them would pick Watson.