Society/Culture Feminism part 1 - continued in part 2

[Gus Poyet]

Do you think women invite rape?

Hell no.

However do you think people who leave their front doors wide open all hours of the day invite burglars/thieves?

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

However do you think people who leave their front doors wide open all hours of the day invite burglars/thieves?

How is that analogy relevant to the issue of rape?

 

[Gus Poyet]

How is that analogy relevant to the issue of rape?

Very relevant.

We live in a society where we are surrounded by unstable people. That much should be obvious by now.

Anyone who doesn't take the necessary precautions to avoid these elements is a moron who invites potential trouble into their lives.

It's not a female thing though, it's a people thing. People putting themselves into dangerous situations has got to stop.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Anyone who doesn't take the necessary precautions to avoid these elements is a moron who invites potential trouble into their lives.

What necessary precautions aren't women taking to avoid being r*ped?

We live in a society where we are surrounded by unstable people. That much should be obvious by now.

Oh. It's obvious.

 

[kfc1]

I got it from the rest of that post. I didnt want to quote the rest of it.

Protip: Quoting the part of the post which is actually relevant to your reply assists others in the thread to follow the conversation.

 

[Maggie5]

You are quite right, but you are also wasting your intelligence on these people. They are part of the problem, not part of the solution.

That is why I stopped engaging with Gus. The women in the doco are war heroes. Bit of jealousy there as some people on here are just keyboard heroes. Hiding behind their anonymity.
It is not as if women haven't fought in wars before. These women have extra motivation.

 

[Gus Poyet]

What necessary precautions aren't women taking to avoid being r*ped?

Not walking around late at night by themselves would be a good start.

Don't be getting so shit faced you don't know arthur from martha would be a good start also.

Don't date douchebags would be another.

Strangely enough these are the same things you'd tell a man not to do so he didnt get attacked.

Funny that.

Oh. It's obvious.

It is. Lets hope you're not one of those idiots that supports things like reclaim the night. Fostering a false sense of some entitlement.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Protip: Quoting the part of the post which is actually relevant to your reply assists others in the thread to follow the conversation.

Thanks.

Do you think women invite rape?

 

[Public Enemy No1]

This notion that women sit in ivory towers while working class men fight and die is the dumbest and horrendously bigoted thing Ive heard on here in a while.

Their hatred of women is clouding the ability to think rationally. **** me. And then you've got this other nut talking about **** carousels. Half of these morons will be in prison one day.

Lol and your hatred of men is well established

Australian women killed in battle still stands at a big fat zero. Yeah I say this is privilege, hiding behind their gender

 

[kfc1]

Thanks.

Do you think women invite rape?

What if I do?

 

[Public Enemy No1]

Common feminist tactic...Comparing millions of men killed in war with rape

Little wonder the majority of level headed people hate feminists

 

[Maggie5]

Lol and your hatred of men is well established

Australian women killed in battle still stands at a big fat zero. Yeah I say this is privilege, hiding behind their gender

http://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/women-in-action
Try again.

 

[Maggie5]

What if I do?

Wouldn't surprise me.

 

[kfc1]

Wouldn't surprise me.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

What if I do?

It would make sense.

 

[Maggie5]

Don't watch videos on BF, thanks.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Lol and your hatred of men is well established

Australian women killed in battle still stands at a big fat zero. Yeah I say this is privilege, hiding behind their gender

Perth.

 

[kfc1]

It would make sense.

and then?

 

[Public Enemy No1]

Perth.

No arguments just (nonsensical) insults : feminism 101

 

[kfc1]

Perth.

Best city in the country.
Why did you defect from Norf?

 

[Probitas_]

Common feminist tactic...Comparing millions of men killed in war with rape

Little wonder the majority of level headed people hate feminists

Would you consider yourself amongst the level headed people you're talking about?

 

[Public Enemy No1]

Would you consider yourself amongst the level headed people you're talking about?

yes
any other patronizing questions ?

 

[tesseract]

They didn't die.

Gough's comment amounts to what feminist Shillary Clinton said about women and war: “Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children.” - Hillary Clinton.

So according to Shillary, women are the primary victims of war because after their man died in battle she's now forced into taking on the responsibility and obligation of being the main provider. It goes to show how insignificant to this feminist the value of men's lives are. She's implying that men are disposable utilities to be exploited and that their only value is in how their labour benefits women, and that such labour is worth more than the man's life itself. This is an example of men being treated as human doings, not as human beings, to which I've previously discussed.

Men being seen by women as human doings rather than humans beings is spoken of in Briffault's law.

BRIFFAULT’S LAW:

The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.

There are a few corollaries I would add:

• Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.
  
  
• Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)
  
  
• A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not bloody likely).

 

[Maggie5]

Examples of piffle - this thread. LOL

 

[Public Enemy No1]

http://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/women-in-action
Try again.

How about you read again.
I'm not ignoring the contribution of nurses btw