Society/Culture Feminism part 1 - continued in part 2

[cartwright]

I'm not sure what sort of answer you were expecting from such a post. Childish post = childish response.

You wrote diddums
I asked why you posted that
You repeated what I said

But I posted the childish post?

Wait
...
Hang on
...

Hahahhaha. Idiot.

Oh, and

 

[CM86]

2 Followers on Github? Is this link even anything real. I don't think that 6000 figure is what you think it is, Cartwright. {Gender_dominance_Number_MALE} That seems like number of employees in a job - male and female differential. That's not a "wage gap".

I get shit about YT videos (99% of which have backed research into them, contrary to the ad hoc slander that comes), then this looks like a piece of shit nobody even takes stock in nor can understand. It's not from any research institute, its not appearing peer reviewed, not collated properly, explained or presented in a palatable manner. Apart from those caveats..

How did you reach the 99% figure?

Is that the youtube videos that you've posted in this thread? Because yeah nah, 99% of the youtube videos you've posted do not have backed research into them...

And you cop shit, because you're wrong... like all the time... and you refuse to learn.

 

[Maggie5]

Why did you interject with your post?
Are you upset the attention isn't on you?

Perhaps cartwright has more class than you.

diddums

Poor fool...

 

[CM86]

Perhaps cartwright has more class than you.


Poor fool...

He is like school in June.
No class!!!

 

[Maggie5]

I'm not sure what sort of answer you were expecting from such a post. Childish post = childish response.

Spat your dummy, dummy?

 

[cartwright]

He is like school in June.
No class!!!

Haha

 

[kfc1]

Poor fool...

You seem happy to dish it out but can't take it?

You wrote diddums
I asked why you posted that
You repeated what I said

But I posted the childish post?

Wait
...
Hang on
...

Hahahhaha. Idiot.

Oh, and

You forgot the childish part of your post "Are you upset the attention isn't on you?"

 

[Maggie5]

You seem happy to dish it out but can't take it?


You forgot the childish part of your post "Are you upset the attention isn't on you?"

Not to worry, after this post, I will be saved the eyesore of seeing your posts. Thought you had potential but life will so much easier with you on ignore.
You offer less than little to any thread.

 

[CM86]

Not to worry, after this post, I will be saved the eyesore of seeing your posts. Thought you had potential but life will so much easier with you on ignore.
You offer less than little to any thread.

He actually was bothering me. But I realised I had him confused with a different poster.

He is just a creep.

 

[kfc1]

Not to worry, after this post, I will be saved the eyesore of seeing your posts. Thought you had potential but life will so much easier with you on ignore.
You offer less than little to any thread.

When everyone has everyone else on ignore this thread can go back to normal.

 

[cartwright]

Not to worry, after this post, I will be saved the eyesore of seeing your posts. Thought you had potential but life will so much easier with you on ignore.
You offer less than little to any thread.

+1

 

[kfc1]

+1

I took you off ignore so we could have the discussion about school principals, that was a waste of time wasn't it?

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

I took you off ignore so we could have the discussion about school principals, that was a waste of time wasn't it?

If you had her on ignore, how did you know she was posting about school principals

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Not to worry, after this post, I will be saved the eyesore of seeing your posts. Thought you had potential but life will so much easier with you on ignore.
You offer less than little to any thread.

I'll be doing the same, nothing to offer, nothing worth reading.

 

[Maggie5]

He is only the second person I have put on ignore and I so agree with you.
Peaceful now, now more one word or nonsensical one liners.

 

[kfc1]

If you had her on ignore, how did you know she was posting about school principals

Ignore list doesn't work on tapatalk. Same way I saw this post.

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

He is only the second person I have put on ignore and I so agree with you.
Peaceful now, now more one word or nonsensical one liners.

Second for me too, I took the other one off and he stopped posting which was pretty bizarre

 

[Lebbo73]

He is only the second person I have put on ignore and I so agree with you.
Peaceful now, now more one word or nonsensical one liners.

The ignore option is only there for the ignorant who think what they post is gospel!

 

[Chief]

Is this thread getting back on topic any time soon? kfc1 I can close the peanut gallery and send you home if your posting doesn't improve.

 

[kfc1]

Is this thread getting back on topic any time soon? kfc1 I can close the peanut gallery and send you home if your posting doesn't improve.

Im only getting caught in these stupid arguments due to responding to the posts directed to me. Plenty of personal attacks from other posters to crack down on.

 

[Chief]

Im only responding to the posts directed to me. Plenty of personal attacks from other posters to crack down on.

Then report them, don't respond. Last warning.

 

[tesseract]

Do you know the context, if as you claim, her manifesto is being studied in Women's courses?

It's an irrelevant question unless it's to deconstruct it and have feminists renounce it. I don't see or hear such renouncing from feminists. What we get from feminists is silence, and thus implicit approval.

Suspect it would be just a study of the history of radical feminism which is fair enough and should be looked at.

What you "suspect" is irrelevant.

With regard to her ideas being 'worshipped

Who said "worshiped"?

Perhaps worship like this:

Society for Cutting Up Men, SCUM

well, she was a paranoid schizophrenic who shot people-so her legacy might be questionable.

Questionable to you, perhaps. The thing is is that her literature is studied in women's studies courses and such literature isn't being renounced by feminists.

The lecturers and the students probs go -wow what a whacko-similar reaction to the one I have when you post links to whackos on youtube.

Your feelings on the possible reaction of the lecturers and the students is irrelevant.

More interesting to me is that you know what is studied on these courses.

It doesn't surprise me that you find such interesting, given you admittedly don't look deeply into these issues. Information of what's taught in women's studies classes can be found when doing a little research. There's this thing called Google, too.

 

[tesseract]

It's as much part of feminist history as Seneca Falls, and you can't airbrush history.

Who's asking for history to be airbrushed?

I would think any modern student worth their salt would treat the SCUM manifesto with a fairly critical eye, and look at it in the context of the time anyway.

Modern feminist students don't seem to be worth their salt, for feminists give the silent treatment on the issue instead of renouncing the SCUM manifesto. Btw, "context of time" is transparent deflection.

 

[tesseract]

I take enormous offence at what you have posted if you are referring to me.

Your taking offense is your problem, not mine. You seem rather entitled if you think everyone else must walk on egg shells around you so as to not hurt your feelings and dare offend you. Grow up!

 

[tesseract]

I'm not sure a psychopath has feelings

Says the woman who's taken on board an ideology shared with such violent psychopaths as Valarie Solanis, and who doesn't renounce Valerie's violence or her works which speak on such. Instead, you deflect and call someone calling out this feminist as a psychopath. You exemplify the typical feminist who's in full denial.