Society/Culture Feminism part 1 - continued in part 2

[kfc1]

Romeowho and cartwright, Both of you are a bit dopey and/or havent listened to the video properly. She said there is a difference in average earnings, which is what the data in Australia shows as we discussed only a day or two ago. The data does not show that women are being paid 75 cents in the dollar for the same work, which is the myth she was dispelling. The data in the US and Australia does not show any gap in pay for the same work based on gender.

Being unable to comprehend let alone refute her points you then resort to an insult based on an unrelated sensationalist book title - a book which you have not read.

Also why is the US data unsubstantiated? Have you looked at the source data? Bet you cant even tell me what the source data is.

 

[CM86]

Romeowho and cartwright, Both of you are a bit dopey and/or havent listened to the video properly. She said there is a difference in average earnings, which is what the data in Australia shows as we discussed only a day or two ago. The data does not show that women are being paid 75 cents in the dollar for the same work, which is the myth she was dispelling. The data in the US and Australia does not show any gap in pay for the same work based on gender.

Being unable to comprehend let alone refute her points you then resort to an insult based on an unrelated sensationalist book title - a book which you have not read.

Also why is the US data unsubstantiated? Have you looked at the source data? Bet you cant even tell me what the source data is.

pssst. Maggie5 and cartwright wisely have you on ignore. Stop behaving like a little lap dog vying for attention

EFT

 

[Maggie5]

pssst. Maggie wisely has you on ignore. Stop behaving like a little lap dog vying for attention

Just as well for PM's, seems I am missed

 

[kfc1]

#raepculture

 

[tesseract]

I think that you take the word 'feeling' too literally.
One can say, "I feel you may be wrong" but not sure that they are truly 'feeling' it. What the are really saying is I believe/think you are wrong.

Then these people who say "I feel" rather than "I believe" should learn to communicate better and use language properly. Btw, "I feel" and "I believe" are more or less the same thing in the context in which it's used on these issues, in that it's based on an unsupported position. Also feminists seem to base their beliefs on their feelings, due to ignoring evidence that contradicts their position. Hence Fealz/belief > realz.

 

[tesseract]

Adding someone's subjective opinion to your own isn't objectivity.

No one said such. I pointed to providing both objective and subjective views. I use these subjective views and observations to display that my position is not merely my personal opinion alone and that it's a talking point among others who recognize the issues I've raised. I have provided objective studies, too. Feminists and SJWs ITT embrace cognitive dissonance by dismissing these and continue to plow on with their dogmatically held views.

 

[tesseract]

I disagree, but being the coward that you are can see why you would say that.
Shame that there will not be an opportunity for you to speak to them face to face.
Such a wonderful Christian you are, typical bible bashing hypocrite.

You're free to disagree; that's your prerogative. Save your tears for someone who cares. Btw, as a feminist, you're over-qualified to speak as to hypocrites.

Also, you haven't shown how I'm a hypocrite based on my religious beliefs. I suppose that's just more of a feelings-based conclusion you feminists are so inclined to indulge in rather than producing evidence.

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Then these people who say "I feel" rather than "I believe" should learn to communicate better and use language properly. Btw, "I feel" and "I believe" are more or less the same thing in the context in which it's used on these issues, in that it's based on an unsupported position. Also feminists seem to base their beliefs on their feelings, due to ignoring evidence that contradicts their position. Hence Fealz/belief > realz.

No one said such. I pointed to providing both objective and subjective views. I use these subjective views and observations to display that my position is not merely my personal opinion alone and that it's a talking point among others who recognize the issues I've raised. I have provided objective studies, too. Feminists and SJWs ITT embrace cognitive dissonance by dismissing these and continue to plow on with their dogmatically held views.

You're free to disagree; that's your prerogative. Save your tears for someone who cares. Btw, as a feminist, you're over-qualified to speak as to hypocrites.

Btw, you haven't shown how I'm a hypocrite based on my religious beliefs. I suppose that's just more of a feelings-based conclusion you feminists are so inclined to indulge in rather than producing evidence.

Ice ruins lives.

 

[Sydney Bloods]

Virgin's gonna virg.




Anyway.

What is the general consensus;
Does sexism still exist in Australia (specifically in terms of sexism towards females.) ?

I think "yes".

It most certainly does, institutionalised sexism at that.
But its something the lunatics in this thread could hardly understand.

 

[Maggie5]

Then these people who say "I feel" rather than "I believe" should learn to communicate better and use language properly. Btw, "I feel" and "I believe" are more or less the same thing in the context in which it's used on these issues, in that it's based on an unsupported position. Also feminists seem to base their beliefs on their feelings, due to ignoring evidence that contradicts their position. Hence Fealz/belief > realz.

So now you are an expert in the English language?
I really do suggest you go back and re-read some of your deranged posts where you just ramble.
I 'feel' you have got it wrong.

 

[Maggie5]

You're free to disagree; that's your prerogative. Save your tears for someone who cares. Btw, as a feminist, you're over-qualified to speak as to hypocrites.

Also, you haven't shown how I'm a hypocrite based on my religious beliefs. I suppose that's just more of a feelings-based conclusion you feminists are so inclined to indulge in rather than producing evidence.

Shattered
Such a sad misguided male, no positive female influence in your life?

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Shattered
Such a sad misguided male, no positive female influence in your life?

He still has a lock of her hair and calls just to hear her breath.

 

[Maggie5]

253 pages is too many pages to go through but has anyone discussed chemical castration in regard to sexual offenders?

Was reading an article and it sounded very interesting. Not sure whether feminists advocated it or if was the general population.

 

[kfc1]

253 pages is too many pages to go through but has anyone discussed chemical castration in regard to sexual offenders?

Was reading an article and it sounded very interesting. Not sure whether feminists advocated it or if was the general population.

This used to be a punishment for homosexuals.

 

[Docker Alyssa]

253 pages is too many pages to go through but has anyone discussed chemical castration in regard to sexual offenders?

Was reading an article and it sounded very interesting. Not sure whether feminists advocated it or if was the general population.

With the amount of sexism in that proposal it had to be feminist born. The amount of male-hate dripping off of it. I can smell it.

Being the bias against men towards women in both sexual offence law, and also that women can't have the process done or at least feminism wouldn't ever allow a similar punishment for a woman offender of sexual offences -- The word reprehensible comes to mind for such a measure. Now a psychotic women could avoid any criminal consequence herself on the male of any revenge urge - she would have herself acted upon otherwise - by having the state act on her behalf, simply by concocting a convincing rape scenario.

I think she should go down the "I was drunk, you know what so was he... But still, how could I, as a woman, possibly consent to sex while intoxicated. Everyone knows women don't have personal responsibility in exclusively sexual matters once they drink" route, and watch the feminist legions reign down support. Even if we find out a year or two after his conviction and subsequent chemical castration that she cooked it all up. He still has legal recourse. He'll get out at some point after an appeals process marred in red tape. He'll never get off again once he is free, but you now. Justice will be done. Eventually.

Justice is always done


Canada man faces 6 months over "twitter harassment"

i.e Arguing with snowflakes whom when simply got offended by completely non threatening tweets, had him arrested after he disagreed with their viewpoints gained from feminist dogma -- He lost his job shortly after being arrested. For a twitter argument.

 

[CM86]

With the amount of sexism in that proposal it had to be feminist born. The amount of male-hate dripping off of it. I can smell it.

Being the bias against men towards women in both sexual offence law, and also that women can't have the process done or at least feminism wouldn't ever allow a similar punishment for a woman offender of sexual offences -- The word reprehensible comes to mind for such a measure. Now a psychotic women could avoid any criminal consequence herself on the male of any revenge urge - she would have herself acted upon otherwise - by having the state act on her behalf, simply by concocting a convincing rape scenario.

I think she should go down the "I was drunk, you know what so was he... But still, how could I, as a woman, possibly consent to sex while intoxicated. Everyone knows women don't have personal responsibility in exclusively sexual matters once they drink" route, and watch the feminist legions reign down support. Even if we find out a year or two after his conviction and subsequent chemical castration that she cooked it all up. He still has legal recourse. He'll get out at some point after an appeals process marred in red tape. He'll never get off again once he is free, but you now. Justice will be done. Eventually.

Justice is always done


Canada man faces 6 months over "twitter harassment"

i.e Arguing with snowflakes whom when simply got offended by completely non threatening tweets, had him arrested after he disagreed with their viewpoints gained from feminist dogma -- He lost his job shortly after being arrested. For a twitter argument.

Is this one of the backed research youtube videos? Or another bullshit one?

"Man faces 6 months in jail for disagreeing with feminists on twitter"?

 

[kfc1]

 

[Maggie5]

With the amount of sexism in that proposal it had to be feminist born. The amount of male-hate dripping off of it. I can smell it.

Being the bias against men towards women in both sexual offence law, and also that women can't have the process done or at least feminism wouldn't ever allow a similar punishment for a woman offender of sexual offences -- The word reprehensible comes to mind for such a measure. Now a psychotic women could avoid any criminal consequence herself on the male of any revenge urge - she would have herself acted upon otherwise - by having the state act on her behalf, simply by concocting a convincing rape scenario.

I think she should go down the "I was drunk, you know what so was he... But still, how could I, as a woman, possibly consent to sex while intoxicated. Everyone knows women don't have personal responsibility in exclusively sexual matters once they drink" route, and watch the feminist legions reign down support. Even if we find out a year or two after his conviction and subsequent chemical castration that she cooked it all up. He still has legal recourse. He'll get out at some point after an appeals process marred in red tape. He'll never get off again once he is free, but you now. Justice will be done. Eventually.

Justice is always done


Canada man faces 6 months over "twitter harassment"

i.e Arguing with snowflakes whom when simply got offended by completely non threatening tweets, had him arrested after he disagreed with their viewpoints gained from feminist dogma -- He lost his job shortly after being arrested. For a twitter argument.

Why I am I not surprised you jumped on the Feminists are to blame bandwagon. Shame you didn't read up on the subject before you waffled on. Good starting place is the law in California or even Korea.

Further, it is not only crimes against children but female adults, what a surprise.

The interesting point for me are the side affects and that unless chemical castration is also carried together with counseling not always successful.

Seriously think Australia should investigate this and perhaps could form part of the sentencing process.

 

[Maggie5]

I would love to see the 'favourites' or 'bookmark' folders on DA's and Tess's computer. Would make hysterical reading.

 

[cartwright]

I would love the see the 'favourites' or 'bookmark' folders on DA's and Tess's computer. Would make hysterical reading.

Oh, god.... I'm not so sure

 

[Galactus_]

Female privilege exists for sure. Take the recent Deandre Johnson case. The woman racially slurred, kneed him in the groin and took a swing at him. When he finally retaliated after initially trying to peacefully restrain her, he was the one who was charged and sacked while the woman who started the fight got off scott free. Who would have thought even racism is trumped by female privilege.

 

[Maggie5]

Who the hell is Deandre Johnson?

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Who the hell is Deandre Johnson?

Seems like he is an American (surprise) footballer who punched a woman in the face after she cut in front of him at a bar
http://espn.go.com/college-football...lorida-state-seminoles-suspended-indefinitely

 

[kfc1]

Seems like he is an American (surprise) footballer who punched a woman in the face after she cut in front of him at a bar
http://espn.go.com/college-football...lorida-state-seminoles-suspended-indefinitely

The video of the incident was posted ITT only a few days ago.

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Tracked down the video
http://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2015/07/06/video-shows-punch-that-led-to-qbs-arrest/29775149/
Would any posters in this thread act the way he did in the same situation?