Remove this Banner Ad

Forward line Structure

  • Thread starter Thread starter gbatman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

gbatman

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Posts
18,226
Reaction score
30,148
Location
Behind You...
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Justice League
Does any one else think that it's not the players but how we set up and position and who we go to when entering our forward line that is causing us problems?

Just a few points I've noticed with how we position and how we set up in the forwardline.

1. Delivery.

When we kick long into the forwardline we kick long to the boundary. I am guessing this is a defensive ploy that makes the forward press more effective because we can make the zone heavier because the ball is on the boundary. The only problem is it's causing us to have a lot of shots from really ordinary angles and it's causing there to be stuff all space for our players to move when the ball hits the ground. Should we be going long to the top of the square and not the boundary? I'm going with yes.

2. Our Targets.

We are kicking to ball at our smaller players in the wrong situations. We often bomb it long to Eddie Betts. Sure he marks a few of them but we really get hurt when he doesn't for a number of reasons. When we kick it long to our smaller players it means two things. 1 they are unlikely to mark it and 2 if they are going for the mark, who is crumbing at ground level? When our best crumber Betts is wrestling at the top of the square for a mark, who is running past to receive the spill? Kreuzer/Hampson are at times. This is not going to work very often. We are so much more dangerous when we go long to a tall target like Hampson/Waite and have the smalls like Betts running past because 1 he's likely to mark it and 2 the good crumbers are at ground level crumbing and 3 when a tall is spoilt it's more predictable to the ground level players where the spoil is going to go.

One thing that really bothers me is that we have gone too far with this whole pre-fev unpredictability thing where we tried to have no focal point. The best sides have a few players they always look for and target with long kicks. Looking back at past premiers, the cats always look for Pods/hawkins/mooney, collingwood for cloke/dawes, hawthorn for franklin/roughead. We need to start looking for the big guys when we are going forward and especially when we are kicking it long. I have no problem looking for the smaller guys with short passes or if they get lose but we aren't selecting who we are kicking it to when we are going to a contest up forward.

3. Positioning

It's really bloody ordinary. Our talls aren't positioning properly at all. There should always be a tall target to go to in a central position and there should always be a tall target to go long to at the top of the square and most of the time there isn't. Most of the time when we kick to the hotspots there is only a small like Betts or only opposition players and it's marked or taken away easily by the opposition. Our talls need to stay away from the boundary and leave that area for guys like Walker who might be able to do a hard lead and mark. I just don't recon guys like Waite, Hampson and Kreuzer are positioning themselves deep enough and positioning and leading to the right areas to make a contest in the hotspot in front of goal. I'd rather have Hampson standing in the square and Betts in a position to be at his feet, not the other way around like it has been. The areas we lead to (across the face of goal to the boundary) and where we position aren't right either.

Another problem is when we break clear from defence, especially on a quick break we find ourselves with no targets in the forward line to kick to. This is causing us problems. We are having to slow the play down, hang onto the ball and it's causing turnovers before we have a chance to send it forward. It's a big part of the reason why we are turning the ball over a lot around the center because we are forced to hold onto it too long and it's putting us under pressure. This happens too often and needs to be fixed. It's killing our momentum.

4. The Solution

A) Our tall forwards are Waite, Hampson, Kreuzer and at times it might be Rowe, Mitchell and Casboult. One of these guys must be positioned in the goal square and positioned to go for a mark at the hotspot (15-20m directly in front of goal). We are kicking it long into our forward line a lot, we may as well kick it long to a more dangerous spot and direct kicks to a tall player in a good spot rather than kicking it to no one in particular in the pocket.

B) There should always be a tall forward who does more leading than the guy waiting at the goal square (full forward). This is the modern CHF role. Both talls start deep but the CHF leads out at the ball carrier and the FF stays deep and looks to contest closer to goal and also looks to work into any space created by the leading CHF. The CHF should make sure that he is giving us a moving target and leading into space when it's available but unlike what we are doing, he needs to keep away from the boundary and pockets and be in a more dangerous central position.

C) Predictability. All the good sides are predictable in terms of who they are going to be looking for when going forward. They usually have two or three players they look to all the time. Predictability is a good thing, not a bad thing like we have been lead to believe. The players need to be more predictable to each other. If we are targeting 1 or 2 tall players then the smalls like Betts, Garlett etc can look to position around these guys and "hunt" our key targets. If our smalls know where we are going they can be in the right spot more often than not and it makes their job easier and improves their effectiveness. If the forwards aren't sure on where the ball is going to go and who it is going to go to then how can the crumbers get to the right places at the right time? They can't they are just guessing most of the time.

D) Barker. He's the forward line coach. St Kilda and Hawthorn used to have their tall forwards leading towards the boundary line when he was there and it was ugly and returned poor results. Both sides played in grand finals the year after getting rid of Barker. I had a bad feeling when we got him, I never liked how he set up forward lines at the saints and hawks and our forward line is the same dysfunctional mess with leading/kicking to the boundary and no one sticking to their roles. It's concerning.

Perhaps there is a lack of leadership in our forwardline and that might have a bit to do with why guys are getting into poor positions and why guys are getting themselves into playing the wrong roles like betts being a long target at the top of the square and the talls not being in good positions to kick long to.
 
Good post. The kick it long to Eddie with a much taller, stronger opponent has shitted me off for years. Also the amount of times there is no KPF target in the goal square is staggering.
 
Good post. The kick it long to Eddie with a much taller, stronger opponent has shitted me off for years. Also the amount of times there is no KPF target in the goal square is staggering.

yeah pretty much. Also one thing in today's game, and it happens all the time, was hampson took a lot of marks early, then I don't recon he was on the end of another kick for a good quarter and a half. What happened there. This often happens, the big guys just aren't on the end of enough kicks and when one does compete well or take a few grabs they then go missing for a bloody long time.
 
Great post GB, think you hit the nail on the head with some key points. I think our forward line is a cause for some concern regarding our efficiency of scores/inside 50's and stoppages/inside 50's, although with that in mind we are still a relatively high scoring club this season. It's interesting because certainly from a viewers standpoint we don't have the most functional of forward lines.

D) Barker. He's the forward line coach. I had a bad feeling when we got him, I never liked how he set up forward lines at the saints and hawks and our forward line is the same dysfunctional mess with leading/kicking to the boundary and no one sticking to their roles. It's concerning.

I agree with your sentiments on Barker, i think his forward set up's at all 3 clubs haven't truly fulfilled the potential of the talent he has at his disposal. With this in mind, one think Barkers structures do very well is allow teams to transition to defense quite quickly. It begs the question of balance between scoring output and defensive transition from forwards.

It's all well and good to say let's park our FF 20 meters out at all times, but realistically, it's not going to happen on quick transitions from defense to attack due to our defensive structures. I can agree with the principals however from stoppages in between our forward 50 and the center of the ground though.

I think in the case of evaluating Barker you have to give him credit for producing a forward line that is still able to score quite regularly, even if not with fantastic efficiency, and work as a solid defensive unit as well.

Perhaps there is a lack of leadership in our forwardline and that might have a bit to do with why guys are getting into poor positions and why guys are getting themselves into playing the wrong roles like betts being a long target at the top of the square and the talls not being in good positions to kick long to.

This is why whenever Jarred Waite comes into our side I feel as if our structures are immediately better. Even he's not taking marks, he's always in good positions. Not sure of the sort of leader he is on field, but it wouldn't surprise me if he played a large on field role in keeping the forward line structure.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

We seem to score very few goals from a forward taking a mark out on the lead.

Seems like our strategy is to bomb it long in the hope that Kreuz or Hammer take the mark, and if not, Eddie and Jeff will clean up the crumbs. Clearly not working!
 
yeah I think the bomb it long and hope thing is happening a lot. Would like to see us have a couple of guys with height that we look for. I'm not concerned if the big guys aren't marking it, they just have to bring it to ground for the quality small players we have and bring them into the game. I just recon having betts, garlett etc going for marks takes them out of the ground level contest. We have scored over 11 5 times out of 9 so far which is just ok.
 
Bomb it to a tall is pretty much a standard part of teh game for any team wanting to make a contest in front of goals I would think - judging by watching teams play anyway.

Adelaide/Wobblers/Geelong( hawthorn at best when Roughie is taking these) - standard stuff for them. Long running leads are getting less important as speed of delivery becomes more important in the old school = modern school of football these days.

We should be thankful we have an option in Hamspon and maybe Kreuzer as far as this goes - nothign sweeter than clearnace win bang into tall mark and bang goal - nothing. If Hamspon can keep getting better - it is the single most important X factor in our game for pointy end of season.

Hampson/Kreuz as marking targets relieves pressure on Waite/betts/Garlett/Walker etc etc etc...

Have my fingers corssed on continuation of bomb it to tall in front of goal for us. Looking foeward to teh day when Hampson actually draws 2-3 close markers - sucks then in and away from others...:thumbsu:
 
Unfortunately it looks like a rabble almost every time we go inside 50.

No one seems to be leading. None of our smalls are waiting goalside if the ball comes over the back. We don't seem to have any patterns to draw defenders away from our talls to give them a 1 on 1 marking situation. The only real "plan" that I have seen in the last month is bomb it to one of the pockets to a very congested pack. :confused:

All of the above is due to lack of structure and the buck stops with the Forward Coach.

There is no doubt we have one of the most potent and versatile group of forwards but they are currently operating at about 30% efficiency.
 
I'd rather have a designated FF, whether it be Hammer or Kreuzer, and have the smaller brigade starting on the half forward line running back to goals to crumb anything that comes to ground.
 
Fingers crossed either Mitchell, Casboult or Rowe can cement spots in the forward line. It would make more sense bombing it in to these guys instead of little Eddie.
 
Bomb it to a tall is pretty much a standard part of teh game for any team wanting to make a contest in front of goals I would think - judging by watching teams play anyway...

We should be thankful we have an option in Hamspon and maybe Kreuzer as far as this goes - nothign sweeter than clearnace win bang into tall mark and bang goal - nothing. ...

Have my fingers corssed on continuation of bomb it to tall in front of goal for us. Looking foeward to teh day when Hampson actually draws 2-3 close markers - sucks then in and away from others...:thumbsu:

Yeah I like that we bomb it in there. But we aren't bombing it in infront of goal and we aren't often targeting a tall player. That's the problem. It's common for us to bomb it in but uncommon to bomb it to a tall infront of goal. When we go to the talls they are on the boundry and when when we go more central it's to a short player like Betts. We seem to be doing things all around the wrong way.

I'd rather have a designated FF, whether it be Hammer or Kreuzer, and have the smaller brigade starting on the half forward line running back to goals to crumb anything that comes to ground.

spot on, not the other way around.
 
Come on gang! There was a subtle variation of the gameplan yesterday - instead of Bomb it to Eddie, it was Bomb it to Hammer. :D

But bombing it to Hammer, one out with Rivers is actually a good plan. He has the height and strength advantage and is never going to be outmarked so the ball will come to ground at least. Hammer took 6 contested marks yesterday, that's huge.

Rivers reminded me of Teague having to battle resting rucks back in the day, such was his effort but ultimate frustration at having no support. It was the perfect tactic for us.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Agree with ODN here, he doesn't have to take a heap of marks, he just has to bring it to ground and grab the odd one. We need to be predictable to our small forwards so they can get dangerous far more often at ground level when he does bring it down and it needs to happen in the corridore so there is more space at ground level and to increase our accuracy at goal.

Hammer was great yesterday. Took a lot of marks early then all of a sudden we stopped kicking it to him. Shows that we need to be concious of and look for our talls far more often when going forward. The more we kick it to Hampson and Kreuzer the more they are going to improve. These big guys won't improve if we don't kick it to them and give them plenty more oppertunities.
 
Exactly. If Cloke is one out and the player with the ball has opponents in front of him, the Pies are kicking it to Cloke every time. If Franklin or Roughead are one out, the Hawks are kicking it there. If Nic Nac or Cox are one out, same thing. Likewise Crows with Tippett, Bombers with Hurley or Ryder, Swans with Goodes. It just makes sense.

You have three chances to score in this situation. 1. The forward marks it. 2. He brings it to ground for others to crumb it. 3. He recovers faster than the defender and snaps it.

If none of the above apply, in a one on one battle upfield, you still can neutralise or get it out of bounds and then have an opportunity to score from the stoppage.
 
Give it some time. Hampson hasnt played as designated go to target every week. Structure is about repetition as much as anything. Teh threat of Hampson being kicked to is what matters - the threat will release other options.

I hope we stick to three talls for a while and see how things pan out. Need to win more clearnaces in order to be able to test this three tall structure anyway.

Hopefully we will have three options from clearances-
hand pass and outside run
Bomb to Hampson
kick to Walker / Waite

thats i what was happenning at start of year...losing stoppages mucked dit all up. We will get back there and become unplayable again.
 
Walker and waite used to be great lead up forwards. Walker moreso now, due to his pace. What ever happened to a system that was working?
 
Walker and waite used to be great lead up forwards. Walker moreso now, due to his pace. What ever happened to a system that was working?
Kicking skills of players up field is a huge worry, and haven't had much space to use it to advantage recently with the crowding around stoppages. Always pressured, out numbered or in the hands of poor users whilst being pressured and out numbered.
 
Just saw a replay of Adam Grocke - Eagles
who played Key Forward for Sth.Australia vs. West Aust. and kicked 6 goals b/f 1/2 time..dominated this state game from the 2 quarters i just saw on the ABC replay from last Sat
Great ready made recruit ala Crameri ?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Forward line structure? I didn't know we had any. :rolleyes:

IMO Barker has to go.
(Apparently we'll win a premiership next year if he leaves!!:p)
 
On the weekend Hampson often played out of the goal square and Kreuzer lead out of CHF to create space. Seemed to work reasonably well...against Melbourne.

Our forward structure won't be good enough to win a flag unless we trade for, poach or develop a key forward. Waite is far too injury prone and lapses in and out of form...he's a perfect foil but not a focal point.

A key forward capable of consistently marking or bringing the ball to ground will improve all our other forwards immensely as well.

We should be searching the land for 22-24 year old key position players who are finding it hard to break into senior sides. Give them an opportunity and we may have the arsenal required for 17.
 
On the weekend Hampson often played out of the goal square and Kreuzer lead out of CHF to create space. Seemed to work reasonably well...against Melbourne.

Our forward structure won't be good enough to win a flag unless we trade for, poach or develop a key forward. Waite is far too injury prone and lapses in and out of form...he's a perfect foil but not a focal point.

A key forward capable of consistently marking or bringing the ball to ground will improve all our other forwards immensely as well.

We should be searching the land for 22-24 year old key position players who are finding it hard to break into senior sides. Give them an opportunity and we may have the arsenal required for 17.

It did when we kicked to them then like usual we just stopped looking for the tall players up forward. I don't think our forward line is that far off, Hampson is not far off, kreuzer should be better than what he is and hopefully he will be soon. Mitchell is a hopeful for the future. Because our small forwards are so good marking it isn't that important, just bringing it down. We are just kicking it to the wrong players and to the wrong areas of the forward line more often than not. Will be watching pretty closely this weekend to see how we are going about bringing the ball into our forward line, who we are kicking it to and what areas we are kicking it to. I hope to see less kicks to short/small players unless they are open or on a lead and a lot more kicks to guys like Hampson and I hope to see them in a much more central position.

As for your secong point we did that with Rowe but he got sick. Hopefully he recovers and can have a decent crack at things soon. You can pick a lot of duds chasing players/rejects due to needs. I'm not sure we'd upgrade on anyone we've got.
 
Just saw a replay of Adam Grocke - Eagles
who played Key Forward for Sth.Australia vs. West Aust. and kicked 6 goals b/f 1/2 time..dominated this state game from the 2 quarters i just saw on the ABC replay from last Sat
Great ready made recruit ala Crameri ?

Yeah he was brilliant in that game. Also copped a whack in the head that didn't seem to slow him down. There are some great forwards in the SANFL atm
 
It did when we kicked to them then like usual we just stopped looking for the tall players up forward. I don't think our forward line is that far off, Hampson is not far off, kreuzer should be better than what he is and hopefully he will be soon. Mitchell is a hopeful for the future. Because our small forwards are so good marking it isn't that important, just bringing it down. We are just kicking it to the wrong players and to the wrong areas of the forward line more often than not. Will be watching pretty closely this weekend to see how we are going about bringing the ball into our forward line, who we are kicking it to and what areas we are kicking it to. I hope to see less kicks to short/small players unless they are open or on a lead and a lot more kicks to guys like Hampson and I hope to see them in a much more central position.

As for your secong point we did that with Rowe but he got sick. Hopefully he recovers and can have a decent crack at things soon. You can pick a lot of duds chasing players/rejects due to needs. I'm not sure we'd upgrade on anyone we've got.

Picking up Rowe was the right strategy and it's very unfortunate that he won't get the opportunity this year due to his illness. That said, during NAB cup he looked relatively slow and maybe only restricted to playing out of the goal square. Hopefully next year we can see what he has to offer. But chemo can really knock you around so it might be a bit too much to expect him to provide a really strong option next year.

Mitchell is a very exciting prospect for mine, but his injury worries mean we are far from able to "write his name down" to hold a key forward post in the future.

I think we'd be crazy not trying to offload a 3rd or 4th round pick this year for an out of luck forward from another club. A fresh opportunity can make the world of difference.

Hampson I think will be very useful to us as a goal kicking ruckman, but I don't see him being capable of holding a key forward post per se like Tippet can. But if he continues to improve his goal kicking he may give us that option. His marking has improved out of sight.*

* pun very much intended
 
Picking up Rowe was the right strategy and it's very unfortunate that he won't get the opportunity this year due to his illness. That said, during NAB cup he looked relatively slow and maybe only restricted to playing out of the goal square. Hopefully next year we can see what he has to offer. But chemo can really knock you around so it might be a bit too much to expect him to provide a really strong option next year.

Mitchell is a very exciting prospect for mine, but his injury worries mean we are far from able to "write his name down" to hold a key forward post in the future.

I think we'd be crazy not trying to offload a 3rd or 4th round pick this year for an out of luck forward from another club. A fresh opportunity can make the world of difference.



I cringe as I type this - Gumbleton ?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom