Given the quality still available in the likes of Panos/Hartigan/Tehmel etc etc, should/could we delist one more in order to make space for an extra pick? GC will pick the eyes out of the rookie draft so the best will be gone before our pick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.

Mmmm.....my thoughts exactly.Would be nice to delist mcmahon![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The quality will be GONE.
I would like Matthew Panos & Nathan Vardy in rookie draft or Psd, Both touted to be a 2nd round pick. I would've liked these 2 instead of Jeromey Webberley & Ben Nason.
I would like Matthew Panos & Nathan Vardy in rookie draft or Psd, Both touted to be a 2nd round pick. I would've liked these 2 instead of Jeromey Webberley & Ben Nason.
Gold Coast have the first 5 rookie picks. The quality will be GONE. We need to delist McMahon and promise to re-draft him as a rookie (2nd last pick, before Polak) if we want another pick before the Gold Coast gets in.
Why we still have Simmonds on the list is also beyond me? Polly and Graham could Take the lions share whilst Vicks and Browne continue to develop. An additional pick would allow us to grab Hannath, who is a very promising Ruck in the PSD. FFS we won't be anywhere near the finals for several years, so why hang on to Simmonds and McMahon!
My plan would be to approach Simmo and ask him to agree to become a 'Mature Rookie' ala Polly. He could still be at the club, play as many games as we need him to....but free up a spot for another youngster. C'mon Richmond get it done.Polak was also uncontracted not sure if ruck work is really where he will be used if he was to stay. Some extra coverage for the youngsters was required. The only other choices were Putt who had done nothing and Pattison it would have been very unlikely at their age they would have accepted a one year contract whereas Simmonds would.
I take solace in believing that Simmonds will have limited game time for Richmond next season and is likely to be delisted next year anyway.
Again Danog.....as much as McMuffin frustrates us, these kids that ALL have been overlooked...as in not one club thought they were worth putting on their main lists, are speculative and all deserve a go, but any of the top 5 are just as likely to play 100+ games as the next 50. Relax!
David Gourdis, ... who amount to nothing!!!