- Sep 6, 2005
- 145,125
- 94,972
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Thread starter
- #26
Thanks for your feedback. Next one will do as you reckon and assess.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're certainly entitled to your opinion. I'm not trying to be mean.
Just saying though, I don't understand why bother making a podcast if you're so obviously fabricating things like voices and people?
surely this can't be as bad as Warren Sharps podcasts? I've never heard someone talk as fast as him in my life
good to follow on twitter but I ain't going near another podcast
It's all a pastiche.
GG said:Not very nice of you to distrust people on the internet as being fake. But oh well, if you must.
mention me next week and I'll listenGive it a try, imo. Everyone has their opinion, you might like ?
I'll talk about you next episode. Promise. Would like your feedback for this episode in the meantimemention me next week and I'll listen
You're certainly entitled to your opinion. I'm not trying to be mean.
Just saying though, I don't understand why bother making a podcast if you're so obviously fabricating things like voices and people?
You really should make some appearances on the official BF podcast that beinpurplengreen does. You have a lot of insight and you often fly in the face of convention yourself, or contest the status quo.I think one has to 'lighten up' around here and embrace the concept with scripting, timing and more importantly the 'entertainment value' that is FAR more credible than listening to the 'run of the mill dumbed down talk on SEN'…
Well done GG.. that was amusing.. and got some laughs!! I'm sure you meant the Rams pass D and not the porous rush D
I may have to pull off the same ventriloquist act with a mid-season AE run-thru that BeinPurplenGreen has personally requested recently.
I'll take thatits better than Warren Sharps
Sorry to say, but this is cringe worthy.
It is painfully obvious that these are fake voices and probably fake people.
It's also painfully obvious that this was not a 'conversation' - this was 3 separately recorded audio tracks.
Its as if this was all recorded by one person doing all 3 voices themselves and merging them together later.
Its definitely three separate recordings merged, and at least two of the voices are the same person.
saving up the money to afford me for the interview?My next effort is going to rock your socks. I'm gonna step it up big time, it's going to bigger than Big Ben.
Might take 2 to 3 weeks tho, pending time, but no hints or previews.
I will get you in for a segment for sure. Just need some time to get it all organized.saving up the money to afford me for the interview?
That time constitutesI will get you in for a segment for sure. Just need some time to get it all organized.