Remove this Banner Ad

Review Good, Bad, Ugly

  • Thread starter Thread starter Carmo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Bullseye I reckon.

Shades of Ricciuto 95/96. The raging bull, Dean Kemp KO. Reckon he loved that reputation and Shaw fuelled it.

Got a lot smarter under Blight and rounded out his game. Danger's game has not undergone the same transformation.
 
Bullseye I reckon.

Shades of Ricciuto 95/96. The raging bull, Dean Kemp KO. Reckon he loved that reputation and Shaw fuelled it.

Got a lot smarter under Blight and rounded out his game. Danger's game has not undergone the same transformation.

I remember the press in early 94 about Ricciuto. They reckoned it was time he cashed in on his skills and reading of the play. He'd been mostly back pocket in his first year. Its accepted and admitted to by all parties that during the 94 season there was a perception we were soft. Robert Shaw made a point of this to the players and asked for volunteers to sacrifice their game and intimidate the opposition.

19 year old mark Ricciutto accepted the challenge. Blight didn't think we needed that. I do know that lots of players got out of Ricciuttos way years after he stopped head hunting. Ricciutto was a head hunter, its the best description there is for what he did and what the rules allowed him to manipulate. The most successful head hunter there was, as he maintained an almost impeccable record at the tribunal. He was hard in a sporting way, not in a thug way.

Dangerfield is just crazy. Would of sank 3 aircraft carriers if he was a kamikaze. There's no purpose or intent, other than to smash that ball. For him to build conditioning, he would have to curb natural instinct.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom