Goodes, Brown, Judd

[Shrapnel]

Are they the next Hird, Buckley and Voss? To be debated about for the years to come?

 

[bzparkes]

Judd = Voss, Goodes = Buckley.

Brown = Hird because they both get injured all the time...

 

[Kenny_01]

imo Goodes isn't at the same level as Judd or Brown.

 

[bzparkes]

imo Goodes isn't at the same level as Judd or Brown.

You'd better hope no Sydney fans reply to you...

 

[The Zebra]

People underrate Goodes massively.

If Judd continues as he is going he will obviously be the best, but Goodes is easily in this class and has done a lot more than Brown.

 

[Big Scottknowsall]

imo Goodes isn't at the same level as Judd or Brown.

Thats ok, Buckley wasnt in the same league as Voss/Hird.....

 

[Shrapnel]

imo Goodes isn't at the same level as Judd or Brown.

If anything Brown isn't at the same level as Judd or Goodes.
But I spose you think Pavlich is better than all of them

 

[Corpuscles]

imo Goodes isn't at the same level as Judd or Brown.

You'd better hope no Sydney fans reply to you...

Hahahahahaah

Goodes is nowhere near as goodes as Brownie or Chris "Jesus" Judd
..... nowhere near it!!!!!! his 2 Brownlows were flukes, as was the gift premiership medal !!!!

Go Jesus

 

[Dj Chriss]

Thats ok, Buckley wasnt in the same league as Voss/Hird.....

Pssh, Buckley isnt compared to them cause he played for collingwood, if he stayed at Brisbane or went to North instead he wouldve been classed better than both of them, but to say he aint in the same league is stupid

 

[jnash196]

voss Hird and Buckley- all midfielder/forwards
Brown Goodes Judd- All different type players

No comparison between the two.

 

[Ted Ed Fred]

Pssh, Buckley isnt compared to them cause he played for collingwood, if he stayed at Brisbane or went to North instead he wouldve been classed better than both of them, but to say he aint in the same league is stupid

Agreed

 

[Quinz]

I would say that Judd/Brown at their best >>> Goodes. But Goodes has been on the park a lot more than Brown and has been consistently very good.

Still, to compare anyone to Judd is a bit harsh

 

[borgy]

Thats ok, Buckley wasnt in the same league as Voss/Hird.....

hird>voss>>>>>>>>>>Bucks

People underrate Goodes massively.

If Judd continues as he is going he will obviously be the best, but Goodes is easily in this class and has done a lot more than Brown.

yeah he is very underrated, but when he plays well like he showed this year he was unstoppable, but went quiet in 04 and 05, like wasnt as dominate as he was in 03 and 06, thats his only downside.

 

[Upgrayedd]

Uh....Brown has done Sweet ******** all in football, hes alwauys looked dangerous, but never been able to do anything

 

[lion_gooner]

not buckley

 

[Milkman]

If anything Brown isn't at the same level as Judd or Goodes.
But I spose you think Pavlich is better than all of them

I'd take Pavlich over Brown, and certainly over Goodes.

 

[natlovestheswans]

I'd take Pavlich over Brown, and certainly over Goodes.

Clearly, you're from West Coast. Of course you'd take a forward over a midfielder.

 

[Milkman]

Clearly, you're from West Coast. Of course you'd take a forward over a midfielder.

Ok then. I think Pavlich is a better player than Brown, who in turn is better than Goodes.

In other words: Pavlich>Brown>>>Goodes.

 

[Gift]

If Brown didn't get injured hed be the best in the league by a mile

 

[TigerGlory]

I think if Brown wasnt as injury prone as he was, he'd be the best player in the league. Seriosuly, a big, quick, strong CHF that can play in the middle and deep forward but is very quick and athletic is a tough player to find. Browny does anything you want him to do, very well.

As is though, Chris Judd would be the best. His skills are unmatched.

 

[davey_magik]

It's funny how Buckley is so disliked simply because he is seen as an arrogant prick and plays for Collingwood.

 

[natlovestheswans]

It's funny how Buckley is so disliked simply because he is an arrogant prick and plays for Collingwood.

Much better.

 

[Raffa04]

i voted no because the players named indeed are superstars and they might get even better, but to compare them to 3 players that are regarded as legends is unfair. maybe we should wait until they are in their twilight years before we compare them to anybody. Or better yet lets not compare them at all. They are all different types of players. One more thing, on potenial Brown is definatly in the top three. But potenial doesn't mean much if your not on the field, for that reason I don't think he deserves to be regarded as one of the best players going around. He needs to get fit and stay on the park, if he does i have no doubt he'll win a few brownlows. He will also make every team in the land fear Brisbane again.

 

[Upgrayedd]

Ok then. I think Pavlich is a better player than Brown, who in turn is better than Goodes.

In other words: Pavlich>Brown>>>Goodes.

i would rather a double brownlow medalist who can play anywhere personally

 

[Moss Rocket]

Gibbs, Murphy, Kennedy will be the next big things!