powerfan07
Rookie
Was at the game and hartlett looked very disinterested all game
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I tell you what Macca, you're being very kind in giving Hammer a 7.What a frustrating and annoying performance. It does my head in how we can look pretty good for 3 quarters, only to not give a whimper in the last. Its happened a lot over the years.
We looked a mess in the first quarter and it felt like 'one of those days' where you knew we wouldn't win. Multiple players kicking out on the full, giving away silly free kicks, missing gimme goals in the first 10 minutes. But to the players credit they pulled their heads in and played some really good football for most of the game and gave ourselves a big chance to win. Having said that, GWS always felt in control of the game and seemed to have the answers.
Was this one lost at the selection table? Probably, though i'm not sure its that simple. Would another tall up forward and down back have been handy? Sure. Would we have won? I doubt it. Our midfield was well beaten, that was the key to the Giants win today. The annoying thing, as I said in the podcast, was that we train all pre season for a certain structure only to let it go as soon as we get an injury or suspension. We had players available that could have helped. We chose not to select them.
We do become entirely predictable when just playing Dixon up forward. Westhoff didn't do much and you can't rely on small forwards to win you games every week. Down back, Austin would have helped. Their falls kicked 8 goals. Ours kicked 2. Theres the game. Jonas, Clurey and Houston did as well as they could, but were always playing undersized.
And yet despite that, we still found ourselves 10 points up with a few minutes to go in the 3rd quarter. We had the momentum and we were taking our chances. Then we decided to make some stupid positional changes which gave them back momentum. Houston was doing a good job on Greene. Lets put Pittard on him. Jonas was doing well on Patton. Lets change that one up too. Annoying.
Annoying. Sums it up completely.
VOTES
10
9
8
7 - Hartlett
6 - Trengove, Houston
5 - Dixon, Boak, Ebert, Wines
4 - Amon, Pittard
3 - Jonas, SPP, White, Westhoff, R Gray, Broadbent
2 - DBJ, Clurey, Young, Polec, Wingard, S Gray, Impey
1
0
Yeah now emotions out after game. Concur. It was bitterly disappointing but we did not disgrace ourselves. Our senior players did not have their best game. But a base to work on. Just need our coaches to be more creative with selections and break free of this fixation we have playing small. We also need to be more ruthless dropping under performing players. I thought trengove battled very well. Houston is a proven afl footballer. But we need to find a way to compete longer at contested football. Soon as wines is beaten we seem to have no one stepping up.I thought our defensive structures were really good for three quarters. They broke down in the last for the reasons discussed - massive amount of talent in GWS and a structural imbalance.
But I look ahead and see good talls being available like Ryder, Hombsch, Austin, Frampton, Howard. Big mobile young men who can fit into this structure and gameplay. And yes I can see a discernible style/gameplay that will improve over the year. And some of the attacking play built on the foundation of the defensive work was scintillating.
I'm not going to waste time crying over this game that got away seeing as there wasn't much hope anyway. But I can see the development going on and am looking strategically big picture as to where we can go. And like I said last week the result wasn't good but you can see something good being built.
PS How good was Houston again. What a find he has been.
We also don't have enough players who get enough of the ball.We have too many players that lack consistency. The gap between their best and worst is too big, and too often we seem to put together games where 6-7 of these guys play poorly in the same game. Its hard to win when that happens.
There were times in the second quarter when it looked like all our players were zoning off to drop a long way behind the ball, like in Choco's days.Robbie Gray has a Jenkins like ability to play through injury. His lack of defensive effort is killing us. Just rest him.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
This.I thought our defensive structures were really good for three quarters. They broke down in the last for the reasons discussed - massive amount of talent in GWS and a structural imbalance.
But I look ahead and see good talls being available like Ryder, Hombsch, Austin, Frampton, Howard. Big mobile young men who can fit into this structure and gameplay. And yes I can see a discernible style/gameplay that will improve over the year. And some of the attacking play built on the foundation of the defensive work was scintillating.
I'm not going to waste time crying over this game that got away seeing as there wasn't much hope anyway. But I can see the development going on and am looking strategically big picture as to where we can go. And like I said last week the result wasn't good but you can see something good being built.
PS How good was Houston again. What a find he has been.
I know you shouldn't always judge a player on 1 or 2 passages of play, but it seems to be a common theme with Hammer. Don't get me wrong, I rate Hammer as a player. When most of us first watched him play for the club we had him penned in as a genuine A grade mid. He possessed all the tools of a damaging modern day player. Yesterday, there were 2 passages of play in particular that just leaves you scratching your head in frustration. The first incident I believe occurred in the 1st qtr when under very little pressure he fumbled a routine mark that nearly cost the team a goal. The latter was early in the 4th Qtr, where he took a mark on the defensive 50, had time to use the ball well but just nonchalantly kicked it out of bounds on the full. He just has to be better then that.I've updated my votes but I'm still sticking with Hammer with a 7. He didn't do much wrong yesterday and was strong with the ball. It wasn't a great performance, but was a good one, which fits a 7.
Ken was getting too 'clever' with his selections. I guess if f we had pulled it off it would have only covered the cracks. I hope for the rest of the year we replace like for like wherever possible. I am close to wanting us to just play the kids, I'm not sure this senior group have a Premiership in them.
After sleeping on this loss, there is some massive overreacting here.Ken was getting too 'clever' with his selections. I guess if f we had pulled it off it would have only covered the cracks. I hope for the rest of the year we replace like for like wherever possible. I am close to wanting us to just play the kids, I'm not sure this senior group have a Premiership in them.
Sorry, but when did this club start accepting mediocrity?After sleeping on this loss, there is some massive overreacting here.
We just lost to the overwhelming premiership favourites by almost everyone prior to round 1 and the week before we lost to the new outright premiership favourites.
Both games we were completely in it and could have easily won if we sharpened up a few areas. God we were winning at 3/4 time and had a bad last quarter. It's not like we got smashed by either team.
Put it into perspective people. It's not like we just lost to Brisbane or Carlton. We just lost to the two best teams who will finish 1 and 2 come end of regular season.
We get Ryder back next week and Hombsch the week after. Just chill everyone.
Mediocrity is a bit harsh but I see where you're coming from.Sorry, but when did this club start accepting mediocrity?
Since about 2005.Sorry, but when did this club start accepting mediocrity?
This.
We barely got our own game going for parts against GWS, and some credit for that has to go to them, yet shut them done for three quarters and fought back to take the momentum and lead when challenged. When we got on top we looked extremely dangerous. That fell apart in the last when we weren't able to restrict their ball use through the middle and their talls took advantage. The last quarter was disappointing, but not unexpected after a Showdown. If we'd taken more of our chances earlier the pressure and physical toll on them would have made all the difference.
On balance we've lost two in a row to the two teams that would play in a Grand Final if it were held this week, and were right in both of those games. By the end of the year these two losses will not impact on making the finals, most other teams will lose these games. We've got the game to beat them, and a whole season to get 22 consistent performers to go with it.
I thought our defensive structures were really good for three quarters. They broke down in the last for the reasons discussed - massive amount of talent in GWS and a structural imbalance.
But I look ahead and see good talls being available like Ryder, Hombsch, Austin, Frampton, Howard. Big mobile young men who can fit into this structure and gameplay. And yes I can see a discernible style/gameplay that will improve over the year. And some of the attacking play built on the foundation of the defensive work was scintillating.
I'm not going to waste time crying over this game that got away seeing as there wasn't much hope anyway. But I can see the development going on and am looking strategically big picture as to where we can go. And like I said last week the result wasn't good but you can see something good being built.
PS How good was Houston again. What a find he has been.
Well we were beaten in the midfield by one of the worst midfields in the comp last week so it wasnt a big surprise we got smashed in there against GWS. Considering the dominance in midfield out defense did bloody well to hold up for 3 quarters. Very poor in the last but you cant win games of footy losing the clearances 49-30. We need to change up the rotations through midfield, either bring someone in or rotate others through. The defenders and forwards should hold their heads high.
We didn't have anything left to give in the last because we had been hanging in until that stage by the skin of our teeth. We also had too many players in the first three quarters who were down on form and bystanders, while our HB line did much of the hard work.Last quarter capitulation unforgivable
GWS clearly worked considerably harder in the 4th
That was the diff as we matched it with them for the first 3 even with mismatches