- Sep 25, 2005
- 9,720
- 6,297
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Gippy Power
Just listening to 3aw and a few hawk fans have called in and been dumping on the umps. I remember thinking even when we were behind the umps were pretty good and if anything we had probably been hard done by (pendles and Davis decisions were average).
But the main gripe is the contest in the goal square where Brown was holding onto Burgoyne (i think) - technically was probably a free but that is the way the umpire that decision year in year out as long as I can remember so bit rich to pick it out last night. The other ones were the Hodge non high paid and whilst Matthews and Richo were saying on Ch7 it was high I couldnt see it (and watched it a few times). If it was anything it was a brush and in the context of the game it wasnt there. Nor was the Puopolo decision wrong in my view. He didnt dispose of it.
If you ask me the three most obvious calls that werent paid in last qtr were the Dawes in the back on the wing (Stratton), Burgoyne dropping the ball on the wing and Sewell not being given 50 (and he did it all night) when he refused to give the ball back.
But the main gripe is the contest in the goal square where Brown was holding onto Burgoyne (i think) - technically was probably a free but that is the way the umpire that decision year in year out as long as I can remember so bit rich to pick it out last night. The other ones were the Hodge non high paid and whilst Matthews and Richo were saying on Ch7 it was high I couldnt see it (and watched it a few times). If it was anything it was a brush and in the context of the game it wasnt there. Nor was the Puopolo decision wrong in my view. He didnt dispose of it.
If you ask me the three most obvious calls that werent paid in last qtr were the Dawes in the back on the wing (Stratton), Burgoyne dropping the ball on the wing and Sewell not being given 50 (and he did it all night) when he refused to give the ball back.


