I think you make a good point about Pendlebury and Treloar being fitter this year.I think people forget that these two players were playing under duress in last year’s finals series.Treloar missed 10 weeks of football after suffering a catastrophic double hamstring injury and was seriously under done in the finals.He looks much better this year.Pendlebury played the finals after recovering from viral meningitis,and looked thin and sickly throughout the finals series.He was also suffering from a crook back,which wouldn’t have helped at all.Like Treloar he looks much better this year.If these two players had been as fit last year as they are right now,then I have no doubt we would have won last year’s grand final.I reckon we are in exactly the same position as last year. No better no worse. We just need to hope that we can bring our best footy in the finals like we did last year.
I think the list is in good shape if Moore is fit. The additions of Elliott, Moore and Roughead to our side from last year make a big difference, but losing Cox, Sier and Langdon pretty much balances that out. But I still think the ins are better than the outs.
Treloar is also fitter, as is Pendlebury. Grundy has improved.
I think the main difference is expectation. Last year, we were not expected to challenge, so it made the year seem so much better. We've been basically identical this year, but with more expectation. So it makes some of our performances stand out more.
Ultimately, all that matters now is how we perform in finals. The H&A season is about mere qualification. Playing Geelong at the MCG makes our 4th place finish as good as 1st or 2nd. We get an MCG first final. So we have qualified in perfect position. But it all counts for nothing because we need to play a lot better than we have in the 2nd half of the year.



