Opinion Is Bucks missing a trick with the sub selection?

[Pera]

I like Bucks and am definitely looking at the brighter side of tonight. We lost to a top 4 contender by a couple of goals and couldve pinched the four points.

But geez, the face palms seem to be occuring before the ball is even being bounced.

I casually took my seat in P21 and was shocked to learn Adams was the sub... again! The kids a jet and in the heat of battle when things are hot early on, I'd want him in the thick of things.

Against Freo, Kennedy started as sub despite being the most promising prospect in the practice games. He was consequently dropped. And is the player who has the record for donning the green vest in AFL history.

Is the sub selction hurting us too often or am I looking into it too much?

 

[TheFreshBanana]

I don't have too much of a problem with Kennedy as the sub, because he has speed.

I can't really see a reason why someone of Adams quality would be sub, let alone the fact that he's an inside mid.

Goldsack should be sub tbh.

 

[THATSGOLD]

I was shocked Didak wasn't the sub to give us his usual zip.

 

[rand corp]

I think n part its because we are a bit light on for experienced defenders at the moment, we are set with tall defenders, don't have too many specialist small forwards and an abundance of mids and up and coming mids, so one of them gets the sub slot.