Jamar LTI?

[FOOOOTY]

Word on 'ology is we have placed Jamar on LTI and promoted Spence.., guess Bailey really really doesnt want Meesen playing...

 

[KickLongTackleHard]

I would be very pleased if this were the case. Even if it means Meesen still gets a gig, it means the coaching staff see something to be gained from a Spence debut this year. Really, I just see no potential improvement in Jamar where as you never know what could happen with Meese and Spence given their opportunity.

 

[Dez!]

If it's only a 4-6 week injury like what has been reported then I'm almost certain we can't put him on the long term injury list, injuries have to be 8+ weeks was my understanding of putting players on the long term injury list.

 

[old_clint]

If it's only a 4-6 week injury like what has been reported then I'm almost certain we can't put him on the long term injury list, injuries have to be 8+ weeks was my understanding of putting players on the long term injury list.

Apparently the Club has deemed it prudent to seek further medical opinion(s).

 

[FOOOOTY]

Apparently the Club has deemed it prudent to seek further medical opinion(s).

Best not to take chances!

 

[Bartram_Class]

I wouldn't be surprised if this decision was dependent on Meese's performance on the weekend, if JM isn't up to it then we have little other choice than to fork out the dosh to get Spence upgraded.

If Meesen does enough or Spencer does little, I see no reason to rush Spencer onto the list.

 

[old_clint]

Best not to take chances!

Precisely. One Orthopod may read an injury of the foot as needing only rest and the odd analgaesic whereas another could determine that an immediate surgery would be more beneficial. Seems Jamar's advice has been the former, ie until recently.