MRP / Trib. Joel Corey

[re cat]

can accept 70 points because he has a good record

 

[CF]

can accept 70 points because he has a good record

what was it for? I didn't reallise he was reported

 

[jakethesnake]

A late bump to the head. Probably about the right punishment, no need to challenge or anything.

 

[CF]

A late bump to the head. Probably about the right punishment, no need to challenge or anything.

Ohhhh for that? He hardly made contact. What a crock of shit.

 

[re cat]

Joel Corey, Geelong Cats, has been charged with a Level One striking offence against Luke Shiels, Hawthorn, during the second quarter of the Round 17 match beween the Geelong Cats and Hawthorn, played at the MCG on Saturday July 25, 2009.

In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 70.31 points towards his future record, due to an existing five-year good record.

 

[re cat]

Contact between Hawthorn's Brent Guerra and the Geelong Cats' Gary Ablett from the first quarter of Saturday's match was assessed. The impact was below that required to constitute a reportable offence.

Contact between Hawthorn's Jordan Lewis and the Geelong Cats' Joel Selwood from the fourth quarter of Saturday's match was assessed. The impact was below that required to constitute a reportable offence

 

[Vegas.]

Another player with points hanging over them heading into finals! Awesome.

 

[Tonycam*]

Didnt think there was much in it but was worth a look i guess

 

[Patronus]

Joel Corey, Geelong Cats, has been charged with a Level One striking offence against Luke Shiels, Hawthorn, during the second quarter of the Round 17 match beween the Geelong Cats and Hawthorn, played at the MCG on Saturday July 25, 2009.

In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 70.31 points towards his future record, due to an existing five-year good record.

Striking. is that even the right charge for the incident?

Rough conduct I can see but he did not strike.

Good to see the dirty players from Hawthorn get off for more gut punches. Where was this 'The impact was below that required to constitute a reportable offence.' when Ling was getting charged for the same thing?

 

[CF]

Considering the sniper lewis flattened Selwood when he punched him in the face I wonder how they determine that was OK. Another crock of shit from the MRP

 

[Cohzee]

Considering the sniper lewis flattened Selwood when he punched him in the face I wonder how they determine that was OK. Another crock of shit from the MRP

Yep, complete bullshit. Twice now that ******** has been let off for clearly punching someone.

 

[Vegas.]

Anyone got YouTube footage of that incident? I didn't see it at the game and haven't seen it since.

 

[Cohzee]

I would but I don't know what software to use to cut it.

 

[Glassjaw]

What point of the 2nd qtr was it? Time-wise.

 

[re cat]

Didnt think there was much in it but was worth a look i guess

Is that all you have to say

 

[Vegas.]

I would but I don't know what software to use to cut it.

Cheers, but I just saw it on the news. Not too sure how he gets off for that - he has a proven track record of doing this exact thing, surely that is what the extra point loading is in place for, to prevent repeat offenders, and you won't find an offender who repeats as much as old Jordy...

 

[jim boy]

Considering the sniper lewis flattened Selwood when he punched him in the face I wonder how they determine that was OK. Another crock of shit from the MRP

TBH I really didn't think there was much in that at all - thought it was more of a shove which Joel milked.

 

[hamG]

Should have just gone the gut punch, perfectly fine no matter how many times you do it right.

 

[BigBadCam]

It's a load of shit that he even has to take points for that. He didn't even make contact as far as I was concerned.

 

[burto]

None of the incidents warranted looking at. More examples of the MRP trying to justify themselves.

 

[hbk_aus]

None of the incidents warranted looking at. More examples of the MRP trying to justify themselves.

I understand people being annoyed, but it was late, and high. Had to be looked at. Only thing that confuses me is the "striking" charge, as someone has already said. More rough conduct than striking.

 

[catempire]

Will challenge and get off because it's not a "strike".

 

[Simon_Nesbit]

Is that the bump after the ball?

1. Wasn't a strike. (front-on bump)
2. Didn't get him high. (head snap from unexpected contact).
3. Didn't do any damage. (Shiels got up after a few seconds).

Should have just been a 50m penalty. Challenge it.

(PS: Just so Diablo's got no ammunition next time I accuse him of defecting to us.......Selwood should have gone for his deliberate knee to Kennedy).

 

[Exhale You]

We've accepted reprimand and the 70 points.

So that's five players now that will have points hanging over their heads throughout the finals.

 

[thegerman]

Anyone got YouTube footage of that incident? I didn't see it at the game and haven't seen it since.

Just re-watched it.

Basically it was an elbow to the chest. Striking, my ass.

Again the MRP shows it is softer than butter.