Krak, Ball And Caff

[carnthepies19]

Ball will definately be the first in line of those, then Caff, due to his age.

If any of those boys weren't retained it would likely be Kraks. He is 29, and we do have a lot of depth in his position, in Fasolo, Sinclair, Elliott and Didak. I'd prefer Fasolo and Sinclair to be getting a game ahead of him IMO.

 

[thecig]

Short memories.

I know footy is a cut-throat business but sheeeesshhh there has to be some small amount of loyalty towards the playing group.
Ball has re-signed - no point even contemplating retiring him (why would u anyway?)
Krak - the guy stood up last yr in the grand final when others lowered their colours. How would it look to the rest of the guys if we retired him after playing 1 year for our club?
Caff - The guys got talent, I'd be disappointed if we at least didn't chuck him on the rookie list.

 

[GutsGalore]

Personally, if the cap squeeze is that bad, I'd prefer Ball in squad over Caff and Krak because he provides that extra strength that they don't, sure they all have their strengths and weaknesses but Ball gets the votes.

I wish Krak would be consistent game in and out and not have one good game and then fade.