Remove this Banner Ad

VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing

  • Thread starter Thread starter saint66au
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

So ur telling me this guy is this confident about what Lance said but can't even remember what he said himself??


someone used those exact words to me on a footy field maybe 25 years ago and for whatever reason I still remember it clear as day

it does complicate things that they played together for a year, might be some history there. could explain why it has made it this far
 
impossible to convict to criminal standard if it's one person's word against another's, but I don't know what standard they adjudicate to here
 
AFL seeking 10 games, feeling that this is pre-ordained already, AFL putting on a spectacle for the media

He said vs he said, AFL will believe the accusation and rub a player out for 10 weeks regardless
 
So ur telling me this guy is this confident about what Lance said but can't even remember what he said himself??


Woah - in the space of probably two seconds her remembers what Lance said but not what he did.

I cannot recall … sounds like a politician and will probably get away with it too 🙄
 
impossible to convict to criminal standard if it's one person's word against another's, but I don't know what standard they adjudicate to here

A lesser standard would be common. Usually the balance of probability.

I think he gets done. And I'm ok with that because I think he's probably guilty. But at the same time what if he's not?

What a travesty of justice that would be.

It's all pretty sad either way.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL seeking 10 games, feeling that this is pre-ordained already, AFL putting on a spectacle for the media

He said vs he said, AFL will believe the accusation and rub a player out for 10 weeks regardless
I think this is really only the expected punishment should the evidence be found against him and not automatic.
 
I hope Darby Hipwells friends remember this moment and hold him to the highest of standards for the rest of his life. Pathetic

What if he's telling the truth? Would you still blame him for not remembering the details.
 
Last edited:
“Vossy got hit late by Lance, and then we came in to remonstrate as you usually do ... then what happened happened after that,” Lambert said.



He went on to explain what he heard.



“This is where it happens (when Collard grabs Hipwell) ... and then I carry on like a two-bob watch,” Lambert said.



“He said, ‘Darby, you’re a f***ing f****t’.



“I was very, very close (to his face) and looking literally at his face.”



Asked if he’s confident Collard said f****t and not maggot, Lambert said: “100%. I wouldn’t be here otherwise.”
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Jesus christ hipwell, you dont remember speaking to the integrity officer on the phone or what you said yourself but you 100% guarantee you heard the slur. He's lucky this isnt an actual court.. a KC would have a field day with him.
Collard has Michael Borsky KC (a member of our board) representing him.

I really don't know how he can be guilty based on a he said she said scenario without witnesses or further evidence. Collard is walking a mighty fine line though.
 
What if he's telling the truth? Would you still blame him for not remembering the details.

Everyone just assumes one of the two is lying, there is actually a genuine chance he was miss heard.

totally but he should acknowledge that possibility, and unless he really hates Lance there's no real reason for him to be so adamant about it
 
“Vossy got hit late by Lance, and then we came in to remonstrate as you usually do ... then what happened happened after that,” Lambert said.



He went on to explain what he heard.



“This is where it happens (when Collard grabs Hipwell) ... and then I carry on like a two-bob watch,” Lambert said.



“He said, ‘Darby, you’re a f***ing f****t’.



“I was very, very close (to his face) and looking literally at his face.”



Asked if he’s confident Collard said f****t and not maggot, Lambert said: “100%. I wouldn’t be here otherwise.”
I thought the initial lot of evidence said there was no one around/no one heard.
 
totally but he should acknowledge that possibility, and unless he really hates Lance there's no real reason for him to be so adamant about it
Vice versa Collard has already immediately admitted when questioned in the past and this time vehemently denies it.

Like I’m struggling to see how you’re pinning him on this evidence.

The player can’t remember what he said to Collard. But remembers without a doubt what Collard said.
 
“Vossy got hit late by Lance, and then we came in to remonstrate as you usually do ... then what happened happened after that,” Lambert said.



He went on to explain what he heard.



“This is where it happens (when Collard grabs Hipwell) ... and then I carry on like a two-bob watch,” Lambert said.



“He said, ‘Darby, you’re a f***ing f****t’.



“I was very, very close (to his face) and looking literally at his face.”



Asked if he’s confident Collard said f****t and not maggot, Lambert said: “100%. I wouldn’t be here otherwise.”

ah ok if there's a second witness then he's done tbh
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom