Lets help rooch with his roast

[brucetiki]

Why doesn't the Adelaide Football Club request to the AFL that Rucci's accreditation be revoked? Sutely there's plenty of evidence that Rucci's reporting is bringing the game into disrepute.

That'll shut him up one and for all - I don't care if The Advertiser moves Rucci to court reporting I just want him out of the sport department.

 

[Damp Squarie]

I rather we just let him keep digging a bigger hole...after all, he is an undertaker. He'd be dirty on the Crows floggin the coasters today

 

[raikkonen]

It wasnt him that asked the stupid question in Craigy's press conference "Is it easier to match up against the Eagles without Judd and Cousins?" Craigy's response "whaddya think???" Classic!

 

[-VC-]

It wasnt him that asked the stupid question in Craigy's press conference "Is it easier to match up against the Eagles without Judd and Cousins?" Craigy's response "whaddya think???" Classic!

Hahaha.

 

[Dandy_GO]

Merv Agars medal voting. Goodwin got an 8.
7 goals 3, 13 marks, 24 touches, 3 tackles.
8/10 game. I'm not sure who did the voting, but I believe it was Rucci because it was part of his article.
Even the guys on the sunday footy show were having a go at Bicks for only giving Goodwin a 9.

 

[AC07]

Rucci blames umpires for loss. Page 37 of the rag. Says an incorrect decision to stop direct play which would have resulted in a goal for the Power in the last 90 seconds.

Weak Patato Head. You ****!

 

[Seanason]

Rucci blames umpires for loss. Page 37 of the rag. Says an incorrect decision to stop direct play which would have resulted in a goal for the Power in the last 90 seconds.

Weak Patato Head. You ****!

any power supporter who blames the umpires for that loss clearl;y does not have a brain.

Supports the theory we have been running with for some time...

 

[Dandy_GO]

Merv Agars medal voting. Goodwin got an 8.
7 goals 3, 13 marks, 24 touches, 3 tackles.
8/10 game. I'm not sure who did the voting, but I believe it was Rucci because it was part of his article.
Even the guys on the sunday footy show were having a go at Bicks for only giving Goodwin a 9.

Once again, apparently Peter Burgouyne's game was deemed worthy of 8 votes.
Peter gets 40 soft touches, and gifts us a couple of goals in a performance that sees Port supporters begging Choco to move him out of defence. Goodwin kicks 7 goals in a clearly BoG performance. Both get 8 votes. So did Bernie Vince , for the record, in a Showdown Medal winning performance.

Who the ____ does these votes? It MUST be Rooch.

 

[raikkonen]

Rucci blames umpires for loss. Page 37 of the rag. Says an incorrect decision to stop direct play which would have resulted in a goal for the Power in the last 90 seconds.

Weak Patato Head. You ****!

That wasnt the one that turned out to be OUR free kick was it for the throw?
As for an article I read online last night 'Crows limp home'.....the tosser must have written it. All about Port, and nothing about the courage shown from our boys against the odds to win the game by playing football........with the sherrin....not cheapshots

 

[-VC-]

That wasnt the one that turned out to be OUR free kick was it for the throw?

Hahahahahaha LOLikins.

I'm certain that's what he must've been referring to. I don't recall any similar incident in the last 90 seconds. That should've been a 50m penalty and a certain goal for us because Port played on after the whistle when it was OUR free kick.

That's hilarious. Rooch, we are laughing AT you. HA! HA! HA! HAAA!

 

[Mong]

Rucci's writing skills are shocking.

Today he wrote (in the James Brayshaw bit):

"He is now a complete mirror of the McGuire saga, more so when his a co-host of the Channel 9 Footy Show"

The difference between Rucci's articles and what's written on BigFooty is getting smaller all the time.

 

[ams4crows]

Just when you think he can't be anymore of tool and he dishes this type of Shit out!

he's acting like it's the biggest injustices ever that port weren't given a free kick! my god!! he didn't say anytthing about The Thompson free that was paid for throwing which was almost the same I thought everyone wanted Consistant umpiring well in my opinon it was!

 

[RoosterLad]

The umpire boss, I assume it's still Jeff Gieschen, said the throw occurred BEFORE the trip so therefore it was a Crow free kick.. and rightly so. He is just a pathetic little prick. Nice of him to not show his face at the shed after the game too, gutless tiser troll.

 

[Seanason]

The umpire boss, I assume it's still Jeff Gieschen, said the throw occurred BEFORE the trip so therefore it was a Crow free kick.. and rightly so. He is just a pathetic little prick. Nice of him to not show his face at the shed after the game too, gutless tiser troll.

We should ahve a bet with him, if crows win the next showdown he has to rock up to the shed after the game to apologise for being a w@nker1sh idiot of a columnist and to drop the "scotty counter'.

Cant think of anything for if port win - shouldnt matter anyway.

 

[Jars458]

That should've been a 50m penalty and a certain goal for us because Port played on after the whistle when it was OUR free kick.

Luckily the umpire showed some commone sense as I don't think anyone in the ground actually relaised the free was going to Adelaide as most thought it was for high contact to Port.

One of my pet hates is where a guy takes a mark, there is a whistle, he plays on and the umpire gives 50 because he had paid a free for a push when there is no way the player can tell the whistle was for a free and not for the mark.

 

[Dandy_GO]

Luckily the umpire showed some commone sense as I don't think anyone in the ground actually relaised the free was going to Adelaide as most thought it was for high contact to Port.

One of my pet hates is where a guy takes a mark, there is a whistle, he plays on and the umpire gives 50 because he had paid a free for a push when there is no way the player can tell the whistle was for a free and not for the mark.

Happy to give Boak a 50 when he incorrectly disposed of the ball in a Tippett tackle, only for it to be called holding the man, though.