Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

You don't know it's not eitherYou have literally no idea whether that is the case.
No, I don't. It could be anything from a DV bashing to police racism - so why you're saying it's one particular scenario, with certainty, is beyond me.You don't know it's not either
Innocent until proven guiltyNo, I don't. It could be anything from a DV bashing to police racism - so why you're saying it's one particular scenario, with certainty, is beyond me.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
You would think the 1st order of business is counselling dave123 can help
as much as it pains me to defend West Coast, a 72-hour order can be given for all sorts of reasons, some bad, some trivial, but it is far from being a criminal charge. not a good look, though.
sure, but there also hundreds of serious assaults daily, so that's not a great comfort.A police order is issued when there is insufficient evidence to arrest and charge a person over allegations of family and domestic violence but police hold concerns for the safety and welfare of a person.
A police order provides temporary but instant protection for a person who is being threatened, harassed or intimidated. It provides temporary relief to allow the opportunity for a person to attend court to obtain a Restraining Order.
Police may issue a Police Order without the requirement to obtain consent from any person
To put it mildly there is hundreds from these issue every day
That's not the same as saying "this is definitely what happened, until anyone proves otherwise". A presumption is different to a definitive outcome.Innocent until proven guilty
Look if it was a big issue police would locked ryan up or sent him to court. The fact it hasn't it a big thing. Also the cops are not investigating which suggest it isn't a big deal.
If it was and the cops ignored then the cops would face charges or scrutiny. That's like letting a alleged rapist not be investigated
I agreesure, but there also hundreds of serious assaults daily, so that's not a great comfort.
everything described in your post would be cause for serious concern. you'd be more hoping for something along the lines of breaking up a very loud argument in the middle of the night.
everyone quickly speculate as wildly as possible
Why was he playing in a football match at Kalbarri. Surely their contracts say something about not playing other contact sports outside of AFL?
I think it depends on where this "domestic violence" phrase used in the article comes from - whether it's substantative, or whether it's just a case of a reporter putting 2 and 2, and ending at 5.as much as it pains me to defend West Coast, a 72-hour order can be given for all sorts of reasons, some bad, some trivial, but it is far from being a criminal charge. not a good look, though.
Pretty sure west coast looked after him. Kept him on the list while he was in jail, and he played for them when his sentence was served. Then he retired on his own accord.This is probably the reason 17 clubs overlooked him for a couple of years, he needs to grow the hell up or we will cut him lose like we did Newman.
All good. my question was more from a general perspective, not so much a Liam Ryan issue. Just thought clubs would not like the idea of players running around on country decks.I think it was fundraising social event from what some reports stated
Again calm down man ...